The mysterious Mac10 at Ponzi World often has insightful and important things to say.
He also tends to be refreshingly brief.
I thought this post was particularly good and it has a denial theme for bonus points.
The mysterious Mac10 at Ponzi World often has insightful and important things to say.
He also tends to be refreshingly brief.
I thought this post was particularly good and it has a denial theme for bonus points.
The Green party should change its name.
I see no policies for shrinking the economy or reducing population.
Take Paul Beckwith for example. He has done a superb job of bringing to our attention that the reality of climate change is much much worse than that reported by the IPCC and others.
At the same time he thinks we can stop further climate change if we only decided to spend enough money including, among other things, replacing fossil with renewable energy, and imposing a carbon tax. All of which won’t help and will in fact make things worse.
How can we explain this dichotomy?
My theory is that without denial he would be too depressed to continue to research and report on the reality of the crisis.
Much like Tim Garrett now seems to think that fracking will save us for a long time.
There’s lots of talk about renewable energy replacing fossil energy and reducing climate change.
What does the data show?
CO2 released per year continues to increase exponentially. We have not even leveled off, let alone begun to decline.
The portion of our energy that does not come from burning carbon is unchanged in 25 years.
http://euanmearns.com/global-energy-trends-bp-statistical-review-2015/
At a time when we need citizens with stronger reasoning skills, our education system is encouraging the opposite.
http://questioneverything.typepad.com/…/time-to-retire-from…
Chris Martenson wrote a pretty good piece today.
“Perhaps it was my own blind spot(s) that prevented me from really appreciating just how powerful human denial really is. But here we are, 40 years after the Club of Rome and 7 years after the Great Financial Accident of 2008, collectively pretending that neither was a sign warning of the dangers we face — as a global society — if we continue our unsustainable policies and practices that assume perpetual growth.”
This three part series titled “Adventures in Flatland” by Dave Cohen is a must read for anyone seeking to understand our predicament.
http://www.declineoftheempire.com/…/adventures-in-flatland.…
http://www.declineoftheempire.com/…/adventures-in-flatland-…
![]()
There has always been an odd tenor to discussions among climate scientists, policy wonks, and politicians, a passive-aggressive quality, and I think it can be traced to the fact that everyone involved has to dance around the obvious truth, at risk of losing their status and influence.
The obvious truth about global warming is this: barring miracles, humanity is in for some awful shit.
The goal of the universe is to dissipate energy and life evolved to help it achieve this.
Through an improbable mutation that allows humans to deny reality, we became the best energy dissipators in the universe.
Our reward for being the best is probable extinction.