Why my interest in denial?

I’ve been aware of our overshoot predicament for a decade and have moved on from studying specific aspects of human overshoot. 

What fascinates me now is our collective denial and inability to discuss or act on overshoot, despite some threats being imminent.

I used to believe denial was caused by a lack of awareness and understanding, but having made an effort to educate many people, and observing that they almost always aggressively choose not to understand, I began to look for a different explanation.

I concluded that denial must be an inherited behavior because every country, culture, political party, and religion is in denial. And denial must be central to who we are as a species because of its depth, breadth, and aggressiveness.

A few years ago I stumbled on Varki’s Mind Over Reality Transition theory and a light went on. Varki’s theory provides the most simple, logical, plausible, and probable answer to the big questions that demand an answer:

  1. Why has no other species achieved our brain power despite common evolutionary forces and fitness advantages? Other advantageous inventions, like the eye, evolved several times, yet our brain, which is so advantageous it enabled us to take over the planet, has evolved only once.
  2. Why did all 7 billion of us emerge from one small tribe in Africa? And why did that tribe replace the many other similar hominid species?
  3. What genetic change occurred about 100,000 years ago that must be both modest in complexity and extreme in effect to explain the explosive emergence and dominance of behaviorally modern humans?
  4. Why do most people deny the many obvious dimensions of human overshoot like over-population, climate change, sea level rise, peak oil, resource depletion, soil loss, aquifer depletion, nitrogen imbalance, species extinction, fisheries collapse, and ocean acidification?
  5. Why do many people deny personal health realities like smoking, poor diet, lack of exercise, and obesity?
  6. Why do people who are aware of denial (like myself) deny the cancer risk of red meat? 🙂
  7. Why do many people deny scientific realities like evolution, climate change, thermodynamics, vaccine utility, and the improbability of UFOs?
  8. Why do most people deny economic realities like the impossibility of infinite growth on a finite planet, unsustainable debt, and asset bubbles?
  9. Why do many people choose to believe fake news, like the Russians are to blame?
  10. Why do many people seek to avoid all forms of reality with mind altering drugs?
  11. Why do democratic elections never discuss, or debate, or even whisper about, the issues associated with overshoot? What could be more important to vote on?
  12. Why don’t environmental political parties, like the Green party, have overshoot policies in their platforms?
  13. Why do experts commonly and aggressively ignore or deny the most important (and unpleasant) facts associated with their domain? Economics, climate change, renewable energy, and nutrition being notorious examples.
  14. Why do people who understand climate change rarely modify their lifestyles to reduce CO2 emissions?
  15. Why are humans the only species with religions?
  16. Why did religions emerge simultaneous with the behaviorally modern human brain?
  17. Why has every human group everywhere through all history had some form of religion?
  18. Why does every one of the thousands of religions think it is the only (or most) true religion?
  19. Why does every religion, including new religions like Scientology, have a life after death story? Many aspects of religion can be easily explained by their positive affect on group survival, but it is not easy to explain why every religion denies death with a life after death story. A few random religions with life after death stories might be reasonable, but not every religion, unless the need for a life after death story has a genetic basis.
  20. Why do many atheists retain some form of spirituality which usually includes a belief in some form of life after death?

A good place to go next is You know you are in trouble when…

3 thoughts on “Why my interest in denial?”

  1. Many excellent questions!

    Perhaps consciousness is unbearable unless accompanied by denial? Put another way the precise opposite side of the coin, consciousness is only bearable when accompanied by irrational belief.

    Maybe that is why we cant have nice things Rob lol!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Interesting idea. I’m not sure, but you may be saying the same thing as Varki.

      Best start with a definition of consciousness since it is a squishy topic and we may be talking about different things. I think consciousness is the model of the world constructed by a nervous system. There is a wide range of consciousness depending on the sophistication of the nervous system.

      Stages of theory of mind are a common way of describing the sophistication of consciousness in intelligent social animals. Humans are the only animals that have evolved an extended theory of mind that permits them to understand the mind of other humans.

      Varki’s theory says it is not possible to evolve an extended theory of mind unless reality denial evolves at the same time because resulting mortality awareness would otherwise prevent the extended theory of mind from fixing.

      You suggest an extended theory of mind may be unbearable without denial. Is this not the same thing as saying an extended theory of mind can only exist with denial? Since being unbearable would reduce reproductive fitness.

      Like

  2. Denial, or living our lives in never-never land seems to be a prerequisite to have progeny..

    Women, in general, choose a mate who has a strong emotional life and unwavering confidence. Sure status, model looks, the car he is driving, money and fame matter for some women. But in fact they are an minority. To keep the relationship going, or starting one. Women, in general, need that flair of confidence, humor, risk taking, quick conversation wits with her, to start her juices flowing. Then they start to “feel” for that mate. Or continue “feeling”. The bald guy becomes attractive, or the overweight fellow suddenly is her new “thing”. Because of.. feelings

    Mostly such things have little to do with reality. Superior confidence of an alphamale is just show. Its not real. It has very little to do with anything real. Yet women react to alphamales with superior confidence, like its the “only” thing thats real. And without feelings, too bad, there just werent feelings in the relationship..

    So as a species we have on the one side, the women who have a very strong prefrence to choose mates, or just sexual mates, who can dismis reality (I reject your reality, and replace it with my own) and therefore show superior confidence with her. If I remember correctly, 50% of all children through the ages are not actually from the father that thinks he is the father. And then on the other side we have the males that attract hundreds of women to a relationship, or just quick sex, with superior confidence, a trait that has very little to do with the real world.

    So a prerequisite to have progeny is to live in never-never land, to be out of touch with reality. One hundred thousand years of evolution, and here we are. Nothing is real anymore. The Central Banks have made sure of that.

    Reality might start again when the collapse starts though.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s