By Ajit Varki: Why Men Are Destroying the Planet (Planet: Critical Interview)

Dr. Ajit Varki is a co-originator of the Mind Over Reality Transition (MORT) theory which explains why my species exists with its uniquely power intelligence, and why, despite this intelligence, is unable to see and act on its obvious state of overshoot that threatens the survival of itself and many other species.

I started this blog in 2013 to spread awareness of Dr. Varki’s theory because I believe all possible paths to reducing the coming suffering caused by overshoot must start with an understanding of MORT.

Evidence for this is that to date all environmental initiatives, climate change agreements, energy transition plans, degrowth movements, etc. have utterly failed to change our trajectory, and I’m certain will continue to fail, unless MORT is acknowledged.

It’s simply not possible to craft a useful to response to our overshoot reality until the majority becomes aware that a powerful genetic force is blocking its ability to see the reality.

Unfortunately, there’s a Catch-22: MORT predicts that MORT will be denied and therefore if MORT is correct then MORT will never be acknowledged.

Perhaps someone smarter than me will figure out a path around this Catch-22, I don’t know. Regardless, I still find value in MORT because it keeps me sane by providing a scientific explanation for why so many are so blind to so much that is so obvious.

The Catch-22 may explain why after 10 years of work I have built very little momentum and have scant few successes at spreading awareness of MORT into the 99% of citizens and leaders that aggressively deny reality.

The last interview with Dr. Ajit Varki occurred in 2017 at my prompting by Alex Smith of Radio Ecoshock. Unfortunately, as predicted by MORT, Alex shortly thereafter forgot about MORT and has spent the last 6 years reporting on the coming climate disaster and wondering why we do nothing meaningful about it. If you listen to the interview you will see that Alex at the time understood the answer, then his brain subsequently blocked this understanding.

I was pleased to learn that Varki was interviewed yesterday by Rachel Donald of Planet: Critical. Thank you to Rachel for her initiative, I played no role in setting up this interview. I have been impressed by some of Rachel’s prior work such as this interview she did with Joseph Merz.

Let’s hope that Rachel’s denial genes are sufficiently defective, like mine, so that she helps to spread the MORT message on an ongoing basis. MORT is central to everything that Rachel reports on so we’ll know shortly if she has normal denial genes and is captured by the Catch-22.

In the interview Varki introduces a new idea by proposing that we put more females in positions of power. Apparently females tend to deny reality less than males, as demonstrated by their higher rate of depression, and are more empathetic, both qualities we desperately need today.

Given the 50/50 polarized nature of politics today it does not take much of a voting block to swing an outcome. Perhaps if we target females with overshoot awareness they will abandon useless left/right politics and vote as a block for female leaders that support the only policy that will reduce suffering and improve every problem we face: population reduction.

Who’s in denial now? 🙂

If you are unfamiliar with the MORT theory, this is a very nice introduction by Dr. Varki:

If you want more detail on MORT, this 2019 paper by Dr. Varki is the best source, as it expands and clarifies the ideas presented in his 2013 book.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

250 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

el mar
el mar
March 30, 2023 2:31 am

el mar´s survival question:

What does a bacterial culture do when the nutrient solution on which it lives disappears?

It sets up wind turbines?
It escapes into space with the help of trans-bacterianism?
It dies?

What does a human civilization do when it runs out of fossil fuels?

nikoB
nikoB
Reply to  Rob Mielcarski
March 30, 2023 2:32 pm

Perhaps it is just the simple fact that we are all mitochondrial.

Mike Roberts
Reply to  Rob Mielcarski
March 30, 2023 9:21 pm

All species behave like species. There is nothing special about our species, despite our wanting it to be so.

Mike Roberts
Reply to  Rob Mielcarski
March 29, 2023 10:00 pm

I can understand why you think that but I’m pretty sure permaculture can provide all my food, if one gets it right, and you’re in the right climate zones.

AJ
AJ
Reply to  Mike Roberts
March 30, 2023 4:29 am

AND the weather stays consistent with your climate zone and always cooperates by not throwing once in 100 year storms at you, or late or early season cold snaps, or heat waves, or droughts, or fires OR nuclear winter.
ALL gardening/food growing is now a crap shoot (and unreliable) now due to unstable weather brought on by climate change/overshoot. (I apologize fob being a little snarky here;) ).
AJ

Mike Roberts
Reply to  AJ
March 30, 2023 9:18 pm

Good point, AJ. An unstable climate and moving zones makes it all a crap shoot. I guess we have to do what we can. A food forest is probably the best idea.

scarr0w
Reply to  Rob Mielcarski
March 30, 2023 8:40 am

Hey Rob;
Might want to rethink your take on permaculture.
First- conventional farmers don’t earn enough money to get by either. The system is rigged to get big and maximize subsidies to get by.

https://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2021/september/off-farm-income-a-major-component-of-total-income-for-most-farm-households-in-2019/

Second- Permaculture based food systems have to deal with competing with the entrenched food system of ultra cheap, fossil fuel subsidized empty calories. Makes it hard to match price points.

Third- Permaculture, being based on perennials, inherently takes time to get up to production, and as a system, is still in the early stages of refining the best practices. (My chestnut trees gave their first few nuts after eight years)

Fourth- As we transient off fossil fuels, ( whether by choice or otherwise) what else would you suggest? Endless square miles of row crops managed with diesel equipment and fertilized with Haber Bosch nitrogen will not be happening. Perennial systems try to work toward closed loops and tap into natural nutrient sources.

Yes, many permaculture advocates end up on the promotion circuit, but they need the off farm income, and they obviously see the need for the food system to transition, so are trying to ge the word out.

There are going to be all sorts of relocalized variations on growing food more sustainably, but the base principles of permaculture are sound.

https://permacultureprinciples.com/permaculture-principles/

nikoB
nikoB
Reply to  Rob Mielcarski
March 30, 2023 2:29 pm

I have been doing permiculture design ideas since 1997 in landscaping and then my own farm and for the most part it is just massive amounts of work. It also requires massive amounts of fencing materials and other high end IC inputs unless one has inherited a property that has hedge rows and ponds all included. But even my ponds need a large excavator in every 10 years to clean them out. All this could be done by hand of course and eventually will. Though by younger people. I highly recommend permiculture but it is not an easy path.

monk
Reply to  nikoB
March 30, 2023 5:28 pm

I live on a big-ish property (11 acres). I had dreams of doing permaculture stuff. Have realised how incredibly hard it is just to maintain what we’ve already got. Everything you need is so expensive. Contractors are expensive. We just make hay and do lease-grazing at the moment. I am hoping eventually to grow a lot of native plants and do restoration planting

monk
Reply to  Rob Mielcarski
March 30, 2023 5:31 pm

Despite the lovely principles, it does seem like the old Permaculture Design Certificate is an elaborate ponzi scheme

Jef Jelten
Jef Jelten
March 28, 2023 9:39 am

For any who have not seen it yet I highly recommend this interview. It explains my position better than anything I have come across in a long time. Please do not skip the last 20 minutes of summation.

marromai
marromai
March 28, 2023 2:00 am

A good summary (one more) from B of our predicament and how f..d we are – just as a reminder to enjoy life now, as long as possible.
I’m not totally convinced by the timing he proposes, since I think there will be some dramatic events which accelerate our way to rock bottom (like the global financial bubble, whose burst we are witnessing right now).

https://thehonestsorcerer.medium.com/me-the-fossil-fuel-shill-d5cfbd55c946

monk
Reply to  Rob Mielcarski
March 29, 2023 12:20 pm

no amount of policies or printing will put more oil in the ground

monk
Reply to  Rob Mielcarski
March 26, 2023 12:30 pm

it was a funny episode … very enjoyable way to debunk Pinker

Jef Jelten
Jef Jelten
March 24, 2023 8:31 pm

Hey all! I have been dealing with family Shit. Mother died. Seems simple right …wrong! I can not believe what is involved … no wonder everyone denies it ;-} She was in massive pain, in and out of conciousness for weeks, begging to die but hospice would not allow it and warned all family that they were watching everything. Total BS.

Anyway I have an essay about ignorance that explains what I mean when I call someone ignorant, [definition is lacking information or knowledge…that it] and it also explains my thinking on denial.

To Ian … musical genius or engineering virtuoso …” those are not behaviors.

To Jim – I like including doubt into the equation.

To Monk – Nailed it! ontological, metaphysical, mystical…I have no time for any of it. The physical is where I live and that is more than enough for me.

To Varki – I agree 100%…men are destroying everything but to be fair women have the potential too.

Charles
Charles
Reply to  Jef Jelten
March 25, 2023 1:57 am

All my condolences.

monk
Reply to  Jef Jelten
March 26, 2023 12:29 pm

It’s so hard watching a loved one suffer when they are ready to die. My deepest condolences for your mother. I hope the funeral and estate process all goes well

Perran
Perran
March 23, 2023 3:38 am

Since i know you like your rice Rob

Mike Roberts
Reply to  Rob Mielcarski
March 23, 2023 2:40 am

That is similar to my thoughts, Rob. He seems to want a “solution” that allows a high tech civilisation to continue and doesn’t appear to contemplate other futures, calling them unrealistic.

I was a bit disappointed that Nate didn’t persist with getting good explanations of the different hues of hydrogen, particularly green. However, generally a good reality check on the hydrogen future.

CampbellS
Reply to  Rob Mielcarski
March 23, 2023 12:46 pm

I engaged / challenged him on LinkedIn a couple of years ago on the techno-optimism of his energy solutions (https://spitfireresearch.com/what-are-the-energy-solutions/). Resource limits or the reliance on fossil energy for everything he suggests did not seem to register. But he’s great on hydrogen.

monk
Reply to  Rob Mielcarski
March 26, 2023 12:32 pm

I have had so many arguments with Paul Martin and he refuses to apply his hydrogen lens to anything else. He thinks renewable energy means there is nothing to worry about with peak oil. He thinks Jevons Paradox is a load of hogwash.

monk
Reply to  monk
March 26, 2023 12:33 pm

He also blatantly disregards the laws of physics when it suits his denial (e.g. think we can get close to perfect efficiency from a system). FFS I shouldn’t have to argue for physics with engineers and scientists. It winds me up no end

MickN
MickN
March 22, 2023 6:01 am

Interesting article from the Honest Sorcerer, although not much new for experienced doomer. In the comments Louis Arnoux (friend and collaborator with the late Hills of the Hills Group) makes a reappearance with some dire warnings and with a little bit of hopium (sigh). To be fair to him he doesn’t say what size population the hopium is for.

MickN
MickN
Reply to  MickN
March 22, 2023 6:02 am
gwb
gwb
Reply to  Rob Mielcarski
March 22, 2023 6:52 pm
Shawn
Shawn
Reply to  MickN
March 22, 2023 3:36 pm

I always wondered what happened to the Hills Group. Their engineering model of the oil system, and the prediction of a “dead state” always intrigued me. I thought they were on to something, but I lack the skills to analyze the mathematics/physics of their model. A few qualified folks did, some said it was wrong, a few folks said they got it right enough.

The key understanding for me was that roughly two-thirds of the energy from oil burned in internal combustion engines (as liquid fuels refined from oil) is lost to 1. friction, and 2. heat. So, roughly, only one-third of the energy in a barrel of oil burned in ICE is available to perform “work.” As the cost of extraction and processing to refined fuels increases, the surplus energy available to perform economic work is even less than you first assume when looking at the energy content of a barrel of oil.

Louis Arnoux’s improved on the Hills Group model, visually at least, providing a better understanding to the layman not equipped with the skills to understand thermodynamic equations. But I never understood the Green box or other ideas he was offering as future solutions.

AJ
AJ
March 21, 2023 2:23 pm

Yeah, same here in imaging a shit show. As Tim Watkins likes to point out many businesses like power companies, phone companies, ISP’s, etc. are going to enter death spirals as they lose customers the higher costs are passed onto a smaller customer base causing more lost customers until they fail. Not a nice scenario.
AJ

AJ
AJ
Reply to  Rob Mielcarski
March 21, 2023 12:55 pm

If he is right, the time is indeed short. Like I said above, days, weeks, months? I doubt it’s years. And when the financial system collapses, into what? Will we have electrical power, internet, money to pay for anything?
AJ

monk
Reply to  Rob Mielcarski
March 22, 2023 12:55 pm

This is where a woke govt might be good. Our NZ central bank basically concluded getting rid of cash would be racist LOL

Click to access future-of-money-summary-of-responses.pdf

monk
Reply to  Rob Mielcarski
March 23, 2023 12:19 pm

They don’t want to give fodder for the conspiracy theorists LOL

monk
Reply to  Rob Mielcarski
March 22, 2023 12:58 pm

Gosh it just occurred to me, CBDC could make banks obsolete – or at least big chunks of their business model. Interestingly, there is a lot of propaganda against banks in NZ at the moment. Lots of talk of their excessive profits (40%) and questioning what value they bring to our society. Rob I think you could be onto something with allowing the small banks to fail

required
required
March 21, 2023 10:12 am

You guys seen the kneeling putin picture? Turns out it’s fake. More here: https://nitter.net/Amanda_Florian/status/1637969448958132226