Removing the Safety Valves

Pressure Cooker

Something big has recently changed in our culture.

We no longer accept any unpleasant reality, no matter the costs of denying it, nor the benefits it might return in the long run.

For example, parents who do not permit their children to play unsupervised for fear of a scuff. And school teachers who no longer fail anyone and mark all students as above average. And high schools that fly their students to Europe rather than make them sweat on the West Coast trail. And universities that have dumbed-down their curriculums. And citizens who refuse to accept election results and blame fictional demons rather than questioning their own beliefs. And environmentalists who promote green growth rather than austerity and population reduction.

Recessions function like the safety valves on a pressure cooker that prevent a dangerous explosion. Recessions used to be viewed as a normal event that purged malinvestments and poor performers thus allowing healthy re-growth in the next cycle.

Today we are unwilling to accept any downturn. As soon as the markets start to drop the central banks step in to prop them up. Extraordinary measures have become ordinary. The absurd has become normal.

We’ve removed most of the safety valves and the pressure is building. Soon the pressure will be so high that we’ll be forced to remove the last safety valve and start handing out printed money to citizens, thus risking a repeat of the Weimar event and its terrible consequences.

It’s not like we need to abandon capitalism and free markets. To the contrary, all we need to do is let markets function the way we pretend they function.

I understand all the thermodynamic reasons that we might not want to let a recession take root, but I ask you, how is delaying the inevitable going to make things better? It’s not. It’s going to make things much worse.

Our only choices are do we want to fall from a higher elevation later, or climb down from a lower elevation sooner?

Where are the adults?

The Fed Stops Pretending by Peter D. Schiff

The elephant in the room that no one wants to acknowledge is that the “unconventional” policies that were introduced to fight a “once in a century” crisis are now the conventional policies of choice to combat the normal fluctuations of the business cycle. But zero percent interest rates and quantitative easing only worked a decade ago because people thought they were temporary. If they knew that the policies were permanent, the dollar may have plummeted and the resulting inflation may well have overwhelmed any benefits the stimulation delivered. But the naïve belief that the Fed could reverse course, unwind its bloated balance sheet and normalize interest rates, kept the game going and kept the dollar strong. Now that the illusion may about to be shattered, the dollar may not survive the next round of enhanced QE and ZIRP.

QE4 will have to be larger than the three earlier rounds combined, as the annual Federal budget deficits could exceed 3 trillion. However, while China, Russia, and many emerging market nations were eager buyers of Treasuries during those initial rounds, they may likely be sellers of Treasuries during the next round. That means none of the inflation created to finance QE would be exported. So the big price increases next time may take place in the supermarket rather than the stock market. Americans would finally be forced to deal with the adverse effects of inflation that we have been spared for the past 10 years. It’s not going to be pretty.

https://www.fxstreet.com/analysis/the-fed-stops-pretending-201906100556

Hat tip to Panopticon for his excellent daily posts on the economy and climate.

https://climateandeconomy.com/2019/06/10/10th-june-2019-todays-round-up-of-economic-news/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

16 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Perran
Perran
June 25, 2019 3:01 am

Not using Facebook anymore Rob?
I enjoyed your posts.

Perran
Perran
Reply to  Rob Mielcarski
June 25, 2019 3:38 pm

Yes I read that same article recently myself. Enjoy your detox.

Stephen Truslow
Stephen Truslow
June 13, 2019 6:08 am

Rob,
Can you explain to me how hypothetical “free markets” would solve the problem of overshoot, or even how capitalism can be reformed. Can capitalism in any form function in a no-growth or de-growth environment?

Shawn
Shawn
June 10, 2019 6:13 pm

Repeating some comments I made on another blog some time past.

A few years back I saw Dennis Meadows (Limits of Growth study leader) say – paraphrasing here from memory – that the greater the pressures on a system to fall apart, the harder that system works to maintain its current state/structure.

Surfing a bit along this line of thought, I have thought that one of the mechanisms that maintains our current system is interest rates. As growth prospects slow due to first order effects like Net Energy decline, and second order effects like slowing population growth and aging populations, interest rates decrease in anticipation of that slowing growth. Those lower interest rates then spur additional investments. If you run are in business and running discounted cash flow models to evaluate the viability of a project, the projected project benefits based on lower interest rates become clear.

The above assumes the idea that central banks do not normally have full control over control longer term interest rates, they instead front run market forces and play a bit of Wizard the Oz with their pronouncements about rates. The central banks can directly influence longer term interest rates with extraordinary measures such those used in Quantitative easing. But even then for QE to be successful they must have an willing audience who believes in the Wizard and is willing to deny a bit of reality.

Which seems to be the case now. Even as we approach the peak of energy use and complexity, there is no risk premium added to interest rates by the market because “we” collectively cannot see over the peak to the down side of the curve. Or collectively we deny that such a downturn will come because that would in fact start the downward cycle in a self-reinforcing spiral. In fact, the “system” censures those who would name the boogeyman that awaits us.

I would surf further with these ideas and conjecture that we are locked into the current economic and financial system until it breaks catastrophically downward into another lower state. Central banks will take all measures to avoid any recession. Powell seems to have figured that out now. There can be no standard “market-clearing” recession now….the risk to the downside is too great. Anyone’s guess as to what triggers the break but a reduction in the flow rate of oil would be a good bet. Or a shortage of diesel fuel, even as oil production inches up a bit on an annual basis.

In the meantime, most of us (in the U.S. at least) will all scurry about in our cars shopping and eating on credit, with little collective memory of how difficult life can be, and how quickly the turn can happen.

There you have my pop psychology and system conjectures for the evening. 🙂

Apneaman
Apneaman
June 10, 2019 5:27 pm

Thanks Rob.

Austerity is a hard sell & doubly so when the taxpayer has to continually bail out the gambling overlord class while reading reports of their tax dodging – Panama & Paradise papers, etc. Bullets, nooses & guillotines – revolution is the only thing that the plebs have ever done that’s stopped them. They are fucking parasitic vampires……… because they can. I’ll wager if you swapped out 1%ers with random plebs, the plebs would become neo parasitic vampires.

The Only Thing, Historically, That’s Curbed Inequality: Catastrophe

Plagues, revolutions, massive wars, collapsed states—these are what reliably reduce economic disparities.

https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2017/02/scheidel-great-leveler-inequality-violence/517164/

The Great Leveler Violence and the History of Inequality from the Stone Age to the Twenty-First Century

“How only violence and catastrophes have consistently reduced inequality throughout world history

Are mass violence and catastrophes the only forces that can seriously decrease economic inequality? To judge by thousands of years of history, the answer is yes. Tracing the global history of inequality from the Stone Age to today, Walter Scheidel shows that inequality never dies peacefully. Inequality declines when carnage and disaster strike and increases when peace and stability return. The Great Leveler is the first book to chart the crucial role of violent shocks in reducing inequality over the full sweep of human history around the world.”

“Scheidel identifies and examines these processes, from the crises of the earliest civilizations to the cataclysmic world wars and communist revolutions of the twentieth century. Today, the violence that reduced inequality in the past seems to have diminished, and that is a good thing. But it casts serious doubt on the prospects for a more equal future.”

https://press.princeton.edu/titles/10921.html

Perhaps, for a brief time, the new radically altered biosphere will reduce some pressure by wiping out great swaths of cancer monkeys? If they shut down the WHO and other aid that would start the dieback. Some say yabut 1 N American has an eco foot print of 500 villagers. So? Most never cared about villagers in our peak decades of material riches, so what will be the response as the pie shrinks? Fuck em, will be the response. No immigration & no aid. We’ll turn boat loads away like we did with the Jews 75 years ago.

mikestasse
June 10, 2019 3:17 pm

I agree with all the above, except for Schiff’s forecast for inflation….. I’m with Nicole Foss on this, we’re heading for deflation, not inflation. Schiff is a gold bug, Nicole is a big picture person….. Listen to this sometimes amusing podcast…