Retreat to Sanity

I’m new to the work of Dr. Malcolm Kendrick but a skim of his blog suggests he has many wise things to say and has written several books that I intend to read.

I was unable to find many videos with Dr. Kendrick, and some that were on YouTube have been deleted by censors, but I did very much enjoy this must watch November 2020 discussion on Covid19.

Today’s essay by Dr. Kendrick may be the best I’ve read on Covid19 and nicely articulates how I’ve been feeling of late.

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2021/09/03/i-have-not-been-silenced/

Despite Dr. Kendrick’s expertise, intelligence, curiosity, and determination, he has been unable to determine what is true about Covid19, and has decided to retreat to sanity.

My self-appointed role within the COVID19 mayhem, was to search for the truth – as far as it could be found – and to attempt to provide useful information for those who wish to read my blog.

The main reason for prolonged silence, and introspection, is that I am not sure I can find the truth. I do not know if it can be found anymore. Today I am unsure what represents a fact, and what has simply been made up. A sad and scary state of affairs.

… So, I have given up on COVID19. It is a complete mess, and I feel that, without being certain of the ground under my feet, I have nothing to contribute. I too am in danger of starting to make statements that are not true.

… faced with a situation where there are almost no facts that can be relied upon, from anywhere, I have officially removed myself from all discussions on the matter of COVID19.

Instead, I shall return to other areas where, whilst the truth is constantly battered and bruised, and lying in a bruised heap the corner, it is still breathing … just about alive. Sometimes it is capable of weakly raising its head and whispering quietly into my ear. I shall let you know what it says.

Before departing the arena Dr. Kendrick summarized what he believes is true about Covid19:

  • SARS-CoV2 probably resulted from gain of function research in the Wuhan lab, but we’ll probably never know for certain.
  • The current versions of SARS-CoV2 are a bit more deadly than our modern influenzas with an infection fatality rate (IFR) of about 0.15%.
  • None of the test data can be trusted.
  • It is impossible to compare the effectiveness of various strategies using available data.
  • Misinformation exists on all sides of the debate.
  • Everyone has an agenda including the fact-checkers.

I’m going to try to follow Kendrick’s lead and return my focus to the many much more important overshoot issues that are grounded in reliable science that we collectively deny.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

150 Comments

Arnie
Arnie
Reply to  Rob Mielcarski
September 30, 2021 8:15 pm

From over on Naked Capitalism: You might say, “Well, the drug companies will soon have a booster that targets Delta.” Notice that they are instead offering boosters that are the same as the original shot, as in is designed to combat the Wuhan variant. The lack of any apparent plan to develop Delta or other variant-specific shots does not appear to be due to development or approval delays, but instead the span of variants. As GM explained:

It has been noted for some time that the mutations in Delta/B.1.617.2, on one hand, and B.1.351/Beta and P.1/Gamma, on the other, are orthogonal to each other. And there have been other mutational paths too, but those did not rise to significant prominence.

Which is essentially evolution into distinct serotypes, and is one big reason why we are still injecting the original Wuhan strain vaccine into the arms of people instead of a variant-specific one — the antigenic distance between the Wuhan strain and each of these variants is lower than the antigenic distance between some of them, thus the original vaccine gives the best breadth of coverage.2

See here for where I snipped that from: https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2021/09/vaccine-only-mandates-as-a-manifestation-of-the-bizarre-civil-war-stoking-impulses-of-the-professional-managerial-class-in-the-us.html

Mandrake
Mandrake
September 29, 2021 11:44 am

A few observations on the global situation- scratch the surface and it seems there is more to the decision by Australia to cancel its submarine deal with France and ink a new one with the US and UK than is immediately apparent.

My guess is the decision is connected to military concerns not just about challenges in the Asia Pacific region but also about the looming problem of climate change, the prospect of proliferating failed states and future waves of climate refugees in the Northern hemisphere. Also it’s a more logical arrangement as the members of the new trilateral partnership are also members of the Five Eyes intelligence alliance.

There is growing awareness by the military (see G. Dyers “Climate Wars”) that everything is happening a lot faster than the climate models predicted and we are hitting critical thresholds, hence the pivot to the Southern Hemisphere. It’s not just tech billionaires headed South.

The Pentagon and the UK Ministry of Defense are hedging their bets. Future breakdowns in BAU in the Northern Hemisphere could affect not just the functioning of conventional subs (supply chain problems – chip shortages, lack of mechanical parts, fuel interruptions etc) nuclear subs can go for years without refueling, but Everything and so the Southern Hemisphere – Australia, NZ , Antarctica and quite possibly the southern most reaches of S.America will become increasingly strategically important.

We are starting to see the pieces on the game board shift in very interesting ways in response to emergent problems.

Mandrake
Mandrake
Reply to  Rob Mielcarski
September 29, 2021 2:32 pm

Yes certainly, you are right about China’s depleting coal reserves. They have to use rolling blackouts to deal with electrical demand. Also at issue are critical minerals needed so essential to chip manufacturing and the global climate economy. Quad leaders are uniting to weaken Chinese dominance over rare Earth minerals. The US has no industrial capacity to produce rare earth magnets and rely on Chinese imports. It’s a national security issue for the US and COVID has exposed vulnerabilities in the supply chain. Here is a new awareness and urgency. The hope is to develop sources of supply in Australia.

Mandrake
Mandrake
Reply to  Rob Mielcarski
September 29, 2021 8:14 pm

Yes absolutely. Pharmaceuticals, mechanical parts-you name it & many other products that Western companies need to keep their production lines going. Supply chain managers have grossly underestimated the risks of supply chain failure. Developing new sources of supply that are both reliable and reasonably priced will be a long slow process.

As a footnote, China has been making major investments in railways and ports in several African countries to ensure supply of raw materials. The US as far as I know has neglected similar types of investments.

Mandrake
Mandrake
Reply to  Mandrake
September 29, 2021 8:59 pm

Re: weapons – the Chinese may not make our weapons but I wouldn’t be surprised if the US military gets chips or other critical components from them. After all, I read that Federal law enforcement agencies in the Biden administration are reportedly purchasing surveillance drones from China that have previously been labeled a potential national security threat by the Pentagon. And the U.S. Secret Service and the FBI have recently acquired surveillance drones from DJI.

It always struck me as weird that we allowed drones made by Shenzhen-based company DJI to proliferate in the North American market. Seems like a potential security issue. An opening for them to collect land information data on pipelines, utilities and other critical infrastructure. The ppl making these purchasing and security decisions can’t all be idiots, I guess they know what they are doing. Or maybe beggars can’t be choosers and DJI is the only game in town.

Mandrake
Mandrake
Reply to  Rob Mielcarski
September 29, 2021 10:29 pm

Sorry Rob, I didn’t read the first part of your question carefully re the vulnerability “to” China. Right now they need coal. Energy. Anything they can get their hands on to keep their economy running . They are pushing up against limits same as the rest of the planet. And if they can’t meet their customer obligations that obviously makes them vulnerable on many different fronts.

Mandrake
Mandrake
Reply to  Mandrake
September 29, 2021 10:53 pm

…and yes I imagine Australians are worried about the Chinese because they are bullies. They’ve meddled in Australian internal politics, hoovered up all their PPE in the early days of the pandemic after those horrible bush fires and internationally they’ve gotten into territorial disputes in the South China Sea, put the Uyghurs in concentration camps, stolen billions of dollars of intellectual property and generally shown themselves to be bad global citizens. They would take Australia’s coal if they could get away with it. Or strong arm them somehow.

Mandrake
Mandrake
Reply to  Rob Mielcarski
September 29, 2021 9:38 pm

Rob – what are your thoughts on the current coal situation? Do you think Australia will strand these assets to aid global emission cuts? Or do you think the pressure to keep the lights on will win the day? There is a lot of contradictory information /chatter on the subject. Currently China is snubbing Australian coal but that could change as these things do when reality sets in. I’ve read about Australia doubling down to continue extracting fossil fuels despite growing pressure to cut carbon emissions. They are being pulled in two directions at once. Pretty sure that renewables aren’t going to cut it in the short term. I wish it were otherwise.

Martin
Martin
Reply to  Rob Mielcarski
September 30, 2021 2:01 pm

Disturbing. These are the Limits to Growth, I would guess. Finally, we have reached them …

Shawn
Shawn
Reply to  Rob Mielcarski
September 29, 2021 6:35 am

Rob, I agree, the news on and off the headlines is really starting to give the impression that the current global human system is hitting limits.

If that is true, what happens to that system from here? (Dr. Dennis Meadows said LTG may not be a good predictor of things after collapse starts. )

So, is it going to be a long slow road to perdition? Or a rapid dissolution of the current energy production, geopolitical, and social system down to a new lower set point, and a few years on that plateau?

What are your thoughts on prepping Rob, for those of us who choose to remain in place and deal with what comes now?

monkmil
Reply to  Rob Mielcarski
September 28, 2021 5:38 pm

I really struggle to trust anything from someone that doesn’t do initial capitalisation argh LOLz

monkmil
Reply to  Rob Mielcarski
September 28, 2021 7:28 pm

I’m like that with swearwords – extra emphasis means it’s more true haha. I did see a study once that people who swear are more honest. I’m a professional writer so some grammar/punctuation things bother me more than is healthy. But I do appreciate good intel no matter what form it’s in 😉

Shawn
Shawn
Reply to  Rob Mielcarski
September 27, 2021 6:06 am

From Mr. Watkins post: “Crucially, unlike fossil fuels, there is more than enough uranium (and thorium if anyone can commercially breed uranium from it) to potentially power and grow the global economy. ”

Mr. Watkins is usually spot on most things. But does the statement above seem correct?

He does note later their is no replacement for diesel. I don’t know how you build thousands of reactors – the numbers required to replace fossil fuels – in a world of continuously declining diesel fuel availability.

AJ
AJ
Reply to  Rob Mielcarski
September 27, 2021 1:13 pm

I agree with you that the risk of nuclear is unacceptable. Even perennial optimist (NOT) Guy McPherson of NBL thinks nuclear is a non-starter because in any scenario where the grid goes down we end up with 400+ Fukushima/Chernobyls. And the grid is going to have problems as we decline.
AJ

AJ
AJ
Reply to  Rob Mielcarski
September 27, 2021 3:44 pm

Back to normal, no residual problems (other than old age, senility, collapse and perennial denial). I of course worry about having had the J&J vax. No boosters for me – why would I? I must have some inate immunity now? Don’t know what to think about long term risk from the vax, so much competing “science” on both sides. Thanks for asking.
AJ

nikoB
nikoB
Reply to  AJ
September 28, 2021 7:11 pm

Good to hear AJ.

niko

Perran
Perran
September 25, 2021 6:57 am

That might be the last from me for a short while. I really think I need some internet detox. Thanks for putting me onto Ivor Cummins. I’ve really enjoyed listening to his knowledge on heart health.

Perran
Perran
September 25, 2021 6:47 am
AJ
AJ
Reply to  Rob Mielcarski
September 24, 2021 9:18 am

Actually, I believe some people tried to address this energy crisis 50 years ago. BUT, in the U.S. the majority hated Jimmy Carter’s attempt to conserve energy and they voted in climate change denier/environment hater Ronald (Morning in America) Reagan. I also think Limits to Growth and Population Bomb were about that time. Denial and Optimism Bias are wonderful things if you are not facing a finite planet.
AJ

MickN
MickN
Reply to  Rob Mielcarski
September 25, 2021 9:49 am

File this under: You Can’t Make This Shit Up.

I have to disagree-that’s just what they’ve done. The point of this video is summed up at the end- apparently the
Saudis “lack the vision to kick start organic economic transformation”
Silly Saudis it’s so easy – I am currently visioning a personal organic economic transformation into billionaire status and it’s already working. Been so busy with this visioning thing I haven’t bought a paper or my usual bottle of cider so I’m already £4.05 richer.
Perhaps I could sell my visioning skills to the Saudis although why bother? I won’t need the money.