A Hero Retires: Citizens deserve what they deny

It’s time to rest this account.

It has been a hard road fighting against corrupt entities that I never knew existed to such an extent in the halls of power. And against the relentless propaganda that has seemingly usurped most if not all of academia and medicine.

This account came about because I knew that we had been lied to in February 2020 about the origin of COVID and with the help of others we were able to prove it.

Since that time there has been a pyre of lies that we have had to unpick, whilst showing ourselves to be the ones that endeavoured to uphold the values of real science that required the pursuit of truth over politics and corruption.

The time is right to retire now because two things have happened.

The first is that the public is now becoming aware not only of what is true, but how to discern what is truth against that which is untrue. I believe that was my task and much of that work has been done.

The second is that the threats against me from groups with proven ties to pharma lobby groups have intensified. The people involved know who they are and they attempt to justify their activity by creating a bogeyman story directed at us. But that’s all it is. When the dust settles and the horrendous death tally is finally counted, the people that will be most responsible are those that used their unlimited resources (supported by pharma corporations and corrupted government departments with unlimited funds and power) to silence those of us whose only crime was to highlight scientifically evidenced dangers to the public about interventions that could – and did – cause death and disability.

Those groups – mainly #shotsheard in the US and #muttoncrew in the UK with their groupies on social media, all coordinated through a central point – are merely an extension of the same groups that did exactly the same things 20 years ago in relation to Vioxx (where 30,000 people died because doctors and scientists were threatened into silence) and before that thalidomide (where 20,000 children were born without limbs because doctors and scientists were threatened into silence).

We care about this but the majority of the public and the government appear not to. There are no resources available to us and the government – who many of you trusted – have never offered any resources or protection to accounts such as ours or the people behind them. On the contrary they have shown – in the US, UK, Europe, Canada and Australia – that they will be the ones to silence us. In some cases they have threatened to imprison us.

The public remain quiet. Anger is brewing but the government and media will ensure that that anger is directed at us – the very people who showed you where corruption and malfeasance exist in establishments that should be above reproach. I predict that there will be no public protests to “protect medical whistleblowers” or “bring back Jikkyleaks”. There will for instance be no public protest at the supreme court in Victoria where @realMarkHobart will be fighting for the right of a doctor to protect the fundamental and global right to bodily autonomy of patients. There will be no clamour for the pharma-affiliated bully organisations to be prosecuted for what they have done for the last 20 years. Nobody was jailed for Vioxx – or thalidomide – because the public did not demand that they were.

The media played the biggest part. They universally disparaged people as “antivaxxers” who merely wanted to retain their human rights as declared in the UN declaration on human rights. Instead they protected the very people who created this pandemic (and by extension previous pandemics). And more importantly they failed to give any voice to those of us with scientific and medical expertise who tried to raise concerns and advocate merely for the retention of the human right to bodily autonomy.

Instead, the media gave a platform to the likes of David Gorski, Tony Fauci, Albert Bourla and Peter Daszak as if they were saints instead of the face of a global biomedical mafia. Their support group of minions who threaten scientists and non-scientists, scouring their personal files and tracking their homes, children and employers know who they are. So do I. Everything is archived.

The result of this collusion between pharma, government and media (with minions acting on their behalf for a pittance in reward) was millions of deaths with not a sniff of culpability. This is not their first rodeo, but this time instead of 30,000 deaths it was 6 million and counting. And the general public never raised an eyebrow in criticism of the biomedical corporations and governmental and military entities responsible and acting in lockstep.

So the result will remain. 6 million deaths and counting this time. The next time will likely be more. And if the public again rely on the media without question to guide them through it will never stop. There is too much money to be made and power to be gained. Why would those involved stop when there was not a single protest at any regulator or any government or academic institution despite the fact that deaths were known to have occurred and been covered up with no transparency from government agencies – who should have been desperate to release every document they possess to prove to the people that they were above reproach.

The silencing of this account is just a symptom of a disease so insidious that cannot remain untreated. One person – or mouse – cannot treat this disease. I have served my time here as far as I possibly can and must now devote time to other avenues, for what they are worth.

But without the help of the public we cannot do any more. Apathy feeds corruption and only the public en masse can stop feeding it.

To those that have supported this account please now that I appreciate everything that you have done and many thousands, if not millions, either do already or will do so in time.

For now I will bow out. I will continue for the time being to interact with other accounts posts, replies and existing DMs. But there will be no more new posts, exposures or #Gates on this platform until real protections are put in place for whistleblowers.

Just one caveat.. if the threats directed at me or those around me persist or resurface, I will have no choice but to return.

Good night. God speed.

And may the #mousearmy continue its fight for truth and against corruption in science.

35 thoughts on “A Hero Retires: Citizens deserve what they deny”

  1. 6 Secrets of Ivermectin: The Medication That Keeps on Giving

    #1 – It inhibits flu and RSV viral replication, which is why it’s included in the FLCCC flu and RSV protocols.

    #2 – It reduces inflammation throughout the body.

    #3 – Improves the gastrointestinal microbiome by boosting levels of the probiotic Bifidobacterium.

    #4 – It revolutionized veterinary medicine and arguably stabilized the world’s food supply.

    #5 – May help with athletic and sports performance by boosting cellular energy output in the heart.

    #6 – It has profound anti-cancer properties.

    Best of all, Ivermectin is incredibly safe and cheap.

    When you compare Molnupiravir and Ivermectin head-to-head in the context of COVID-19, you can see what a disgraceful, overpriced stink-bomb Molnupiravir actually is:

    Ivermectin: 62% improvement, 99 studies, $1 per pill

    Merck’s Show Pony: 15% improvement, 34 studies, $707 per pill

    This information was gathered from an article written by @MDMichaelTurner (give him a follow).

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

      1. Replace “” with <> in the following:

        Put “blockquote” at the start of the block, and “/blockquote” at the end of the block.

        Another tip (which I’ve fixed in your comments many times) is when posting a link to a YouTube video, always put the link in a line by itself. This ensures the video player with thumbnail is displayed.

        Like

        Reply

    2. Thanks Stellarwind72!

      This is the best presentation by Michaux that I have seen. The message is similar to previous talks but the presentation is polished with nice slides and lots of data to back up his claims.

      We’re not off by a little bit. We are orders of magnitude off from what is physically possible. And that’s without taking into account a probable deep and permanent economic depression and war. The disconnect between reality and our expectations is so HUGE that I can not make sense of the insanity without MORT.

      Nor can Michaux who used this slide to convey how he feels.

      Here are Michaux’s conclusions if you do not have time to watch the whole thing.

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply

      1. Nooooooooo….!!!

        If you stick around for the Q&A Michaux holds out hope for harnessing the energy of the sun via “frequency and vibrations” as proposed by Nikola Tesla.

        I guess we are witnessing what happens when you research, in an honest scientific way, the implications of fossil energy depletion AND you have normal denial genes.

        Liked by 1 person

        Reply

    3. Here is a companion talk by Michaux given the next day on “solutions” to our predicament.

      Grrrr. Michaux wastes 20 minutes restating the problem, then tells us a key will be to change our behavior and expectations, then ignores all of the data he presented in his previous talk, and proposes some gee-wiz technology solutions that have not yet been proven to be feasible or scalable:
      – liquid fuel thorium molten salt small-scale breeder reactors
      – make batteries out of something else
      – scavenge minerals from smelter flue dust
      – microwave industrial waste

      He eventually gets to some better? ideas but his voice did not sound confident and I’m not sure he believes his own words:
      – shutdown industry in winter, presumably to reduce the number of grid batteries needed, except he previously showed that we still have an impossible transition to PV and wind, even if we eliminate the batteries
      – only permit fossil fuels to be used for critical tasks of strategic long term value
      – relocate all industry next to rail transport and group similar factories together
      – redesign roads for trucks and buses only (no more cars)
      – use nutrients in sewage
      – plant crops using moon cycles to improve yields 🙂

      The only solution that will help was not mentioned:
      – rapid population reduction policies

      Michaux did say he thought the population should drop to 2-3 billion so we can spread out in response to de-growth. He also said some groups believe the population should increase to 20 billion and he did not have the courage to call them idiots.

      Michaux plans to join forces with The Venus Project to develop a solution:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Venus_Project
      https://www.thevenusproject.com/

      I skimmed the Venus Project. Looks like bullshit vapor-ware to me. Or if one was more charitable, perhaps they envision a sustainable city-state like Jack Alpert has proposed, except they don’t have the courage to say that for it to work we have to get the population down to 100 million tout suite.

      Liked by 2 people

      Reply

      2. – liquid fuel thorium molten salt small-scale breeder reactors
        – make batteries out of something else
        – scavenge minerals from smelter flue dust
        – microwave industrial waste

        This is pure hopium.

        – only permit fossil fuels to be used for critical tasks of strategic long term value
        – relocate all industry next to rail transport and group similar factories together
        – redesign roads for trucks and buses only (no more cars)

        These sound like good ideas.

        The only solution that will help was not mentioned:
        – rapid population reduction policies

        The biggest policy an overshoot aware government should implement is something analogous to China’s one child policy.
        Have you heard of the real green new deal proposed by William Rees and Megan Seibert?
        https://www.realgnd.org/

        Liked by 1 person

        Reply

        1. I remember skimming the Real Green New Deal Project when it launched but there was no substance on what they wanted to do so I stopped following them.

          I do very much respect Dr. William Rees.

          Are they getting any traction? Do they write anywhere?

          Like

          Reply

        2. William Rees, and realgnd are credible sources to me and I try to cover the general postgrowth literature. The interesting thing for me is that Megan has incorporated a lot of spiritual/mystical/noetic content in describing a way forward.

          Like

          Reply

      4. Good comments. When Michaux goes there, he really diminishes his credentials that were built calling out the transition dream. There is no sustainable technological civilisation or society. The Venus Project is nonsense (not least because it won’t be actioned).

        Like

        Reply

    1. Yes, very sad.

      There are still a lot of super smart people working hard to shine light on the murder and corruption committed by our leaders.

      I’m not optimistic they’ll succeed because, as Jikkyleaks points out, most citizens don’t care.

      I do get some solace from the likelihood that our leaders are keeping their mRNA boosters up to date and so we may achieve justice a different way.

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply

  5. https://thehonestsorcerer.substack.com/p/collapse-too-might-come-sooner-than

    This is a brilliant article by B. It highlights a few very important things .

    1) Trying to look at EROEI of oil industry is not very useful because only about 60-65 % of a barrel of oil can even be made into useful work rest is turned into things like plastics, asphalt etc.

    2) Even within this 60-65% only half i.e. 30-33% of a barrel of oil can be made into middle distillates which is what runs the civilization and powers trucks, excavators, planes ships.

    3) Gasoline is a fuel of luxury which is usually used for personal transportation whereas diesel is the fuel of necessity.

    4) The American oil industry is most likely a diesel sink as fracking requires truckloads of fracking sand and equipment to be hauled on trucks but the light oil produces almost no diesel but only gasoline. This implies that the fracking industry is being subsidized by diesel coming from outside America.

    Liked by 2 people

    Reply

    1. Thanks Kira. That’s a very interesting and different perspective. Never thought about fracking being a diesel sink. I guess you could say the same for PV and wind.

      I think Alice Friedemann gets credit for ringing the diesel alarm bell first.

      Diesel is the thing to watch in my opinion. Everything important depends on diesel, including food and electricity.

      I’m very curious if the Arabs will retaliate by stopping the oil flow instead of lobbing missiles.

      Liked by 2 people

      Reply

      1. I would argue that PV and wind are worse than fracking because fracking at least produces liquid fuel (which is quite versatile) even though it may not be the fuel we need the most. PV and Wind on the other hand are practically useless without batteries which further sinks your EROEI and may even bring it to unusable territory.

        The current middle distillate production is about 30-33 million barrels per day of which 20 million barrels is diesel. There are currently 2 sources of obtaining this diesel.

        1) Good old fashioned conventional oil rigs which yield a healthy return on investment for both energy and diesel.(It is also easy to get numbers because of straightforward nature)

        2) Unconventional methods like using natural gas to heat mined bitumen and make synthetic crude or convert coal/gas to liquids. All of these methods make diesel more like a battery which we charge using other sources like gas and coal. Getting numbers becomes much more difficult here.

        The second method is feasible as long as coal and gas have good EROEI and reserves, which for the moment they do.

        Alice’s book “When trucks stop running… ” was truly insightful in shedding light on this topic.

        I personally don’t think there will be a world war for anything other than energy conflicts simply because of cost benefit analysis(too much to lose too little to gain). This will change if the middle distillate production falls to 10-15 million barrels, which is at least 2 decades away.

        I thinks this also explains optimism of people like Nate and Simon.

        Liked by 1 person

        Reply

        1. Thanks. I hope you’re right that we have more than 20 years before diesel supply falls to 50% of today. I expect 50% in 7 years due to economic collapse, supply chain breakdowns, and war.

          It’s easy to imagine an error bar of +/- 10 years due to complexity and uncertainty so maybe we’re both right.

          Liked by 1 person

          Reply

  6. Nothing makes sense anymore.

    http://creditbubblebulletin.blogspot.com/2023/11/weekly-commentary-back-to-squeezeville.html

    I worry about this week’s conspicuous Bubble Dynamics and market dysfunction. Financial and economic systems should by now be well into major adjustments to much higher rates and market yields, worsening global fragilities, and a rapidly deteriorating geopolitical backdrop. Whether it’s inflation, bond yields, deficits, political disfunction, Chinese bubbles, our soured relationship with China, the new world order, conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, and the looming Taiwan issue, there is today extraordinary uncertainty that should have players reining in risk and leverage. Markets reward the opposite. It was a market week – Back to Squeezeville – that supports the peak speculative bubble thesis.

    Like

    Reply

  8. When Idiot Savants Do Climate Economics

    When Idiot Savants Do Climate Economics

    The fourth fatal error Nordhaus makes is the most farcical. In a 1991 paper that became a touchstone for all his later work, he assumed that, because 87 percent of GDP occurs in what he called “carefully controlled environments” — otherwise known as “indoors” — it will not be affected by climate. Nordhaus’s list of the indoor activities free of any effects from climate disruption include manufacturing, mining, transportation, communication, finance, insurance, real estate, trade, private sector services, and government services. Nordhaus appears to be conflating weather with climate. The one can make trouble for outdoor dining plans on your yacht. The other sinks the yacht.

    Ignorance of systems has its way of plowing forward, juggernaut-like. Nordhaus has opined that agriculture is “the part of the economy that is sensitive to climate change,” but because it accounts for just 3 percent of national output, climate disruption of food production cannot produce a “very large effect on the U.S. economy.” It is unfortunate for his calculations that agriculture is the foundation on which the other 97 percent of GDP depends. Without food — strange that one needs to reiterate this — there is no economy, no society, no civilization. Yet Nordhaus treats agriculture as indifferently fungible.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

      1. After reading much of what has been posted on this site and others I’ve just come to the conclusion that “economics” is like most of the other social “sciences” and not real Karl Popper falsifiable science. I had the same revelation when I was a young under graduate studying Psychology 50 years ago that most of what was taught in that field was “just so” stories that attempt to explain behavior and masquerade as science to the gullible (95% of the population).
        AJ

        Liked by 3 people

        Reply

  9. Global warming may be happening more quickly than previously thought, according to a new study by a group of researchers including former NASA scientist James Hansen, whose testimony before Congress 35 years ago helped raise broad awareness of climate change.

    The study warns that the planet could exceed 1.5 degrees Celsius, or 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit, of warming this decade, compared with the average temperature in preindustrial days, and that the world will warm by 2 degrees Celsius by 2050. When countries signed the landmark Paris Agreement in 2015 to collectively fight climate change, they agreed to try and limit global warming to “well below” 2 degrees Celsius and aim for 1.5 degrees.

    “The 1.5 degree limit is deader than a doornail,” said Dr. Hansen, now the director of the Climate Science, Awareness and Solutions Program at Columbia University, during a news conference on Thursday. The 2 degrees goal could still be met, he said, but only with concerted action to stop using fossil fuels and at a pace far quicker than current plans.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

    1. At least we can see from the past that most extreme climate predictions do not come true… but may we’re still in the linear-looking part of the graph???

      Like

      Reply

      1. I don’t think Guy McPherson’s predictions are a guide to the research. As some scientists have pointed out, the recent spikes are still within the range of models but James Hansen’s latest paper looks ominous.

        Liked by 2 people

        Reply

Leave a comment