There was a nice surprise in my inbox this morning.
Marromai, a frequent visitor from Germany, having tired of seeing the same un-Denial post for 10 weeks, wrote an excellent essay to freshen things up. Thank you.
See also another essay by marromai here.
We all use and need money every day and would often like to have more of it. The vast majority of people don’t really understand what money actually is. Many think it is a medium of exchange that was invented at some point to facilitate commerce – which couldn’t be more wrong.
Readers of this and similar websites at least know that it must be more than that, and that money is connected to energy in some way. Naked Emperor summed this up the other day with a reference to Dr. Tim Morgan’s Surplus Energy Economics:
Dr. Morgan believes that there are two parallel economies. One is “the underlying ‘real’ or physical economy of products and services” and the other is a “financial economy of money and credit.” “Money has no intrinsic value, but possesses value only in relation to the material things for which it can be exchanged.”
https://nakedemperor.substack.com/p/the-everything-bubble-the-end-of
His article somehow anticipates the conclusion of this essay and describes very well why the divergence between ever-expanding, artificially inflated finance and shrinking real economy will soon lead to a pretty big bang. But an interesting point for me – and maybe for you too? – is how did our financial system emerge in the first place? What exactly is money and how did it become a proxy for energy?
I will try to describe that below, also to better understand it myself – feel free to ask questions or write your critique in the comments. My findings, which I try to summarize in my own words, come mainly from “Ein Buch für Keinen” (A Book for None) by Stefan Gruber which in turn is based on an economic theory called “Debitism” according to German economist Paul C. Martin.
In advance, we must be clear that all life forms known to us are dissipative systems. Every living being is condemned to accumulate energy to maintain itself, irreversibly increasing its complexity and thus entropy. If it cannot collect more energy than its body needs to sustain itself, it dies. A simple basic equation: life requires energy. This is the primordial debt that every living thing owes itself and that it must pay off if it does not want to perish. The crucial thing is that this debt must be paid in time (hunger) to escape the sanction (death). If food (energy) was always and everywhere available, this would be an insignificant automatic action. Only the pressure of a deadline in combination with scarcity and effort to procure measures a value to the debt. This definition will be important later.
Now let’s look at mankind, which for a long time lived in nomadic hunter-gatherer groups and more or less unconsciously paid off its primordial debt, like all other animals. At some point in history, due to external pressures such as depleted hunting grounds or changing climatic conditions, it transitioned to both nomadic pastoral tribes, which learned to raise animals and move with them when a region was grazed off, and permanently sedentary, arable land societies. Tribal societies don’t know or use money, since they produce everything they need on their own and share it among each other. This is called a subsistence economy.
An arable tribe has the great disadvantage of no longer being regionally flexible – its sedentariness was a weakness that made it vulnerable to raids by nomadic pastoral tribes who could rob its earned and stored supplies (stored energy to pay the primordial debt). However, the predatory pastoral tribes soon discovered that a peasant tribe could be raided and wiped out only once. But if it is “offered protection” from other nomads in return for a tribute in the form of the food it produces, this is to the advantage of both (more to the advantage of the herdsmen than the farmers, of course). The shepherd tribe arises as guardians and rulers over the peasants (“The Lord is my shepherd”), promising protection and demanding tributes in return to maintain and expand their power.
Only after the ruler specified the levy, which had to be paid on a date, this levy became a commodity in demand and thus money. And it became the yardstick for the valuation of all other goods. The levy, i.e. money, was a commodity and with this commodity the debt to the authorities was repaid.
The first taxes were paid in kind, e.g. grain (energy to service the original debt) – later, when empires and complexity grew, they were put in parity with silver for the sake of simplicity (e.g. 180 barley grains = 1 shekel of silver in Mesopotamia). After that, weapons metal, i.e. copper, tin and later iron were declared to be levies. Also gold counted at first as weapon metal, because it was easy to work. Whether money is in kind, or metal to produce weapons, or today’s colorfully printed paper slips, is completely irrelevant. Money is, what is defined as levy by the ruling power. It does not need to have an intrinsic value.
The decisive factor for the emergence of money was therefore the simultaneous emergence of a power cycle: the levy could be used to buy mercenaries to maintain power. The mercenaries exchanged the levy for goods and services from the population. The people in turn were able to pay tribute to the ruler, which further strengthened the ruler’s power. But the ruling power had the problem of having to make expenditures in advance. Naturally, it tries to recover this deficit with the demanded levies, whereby it has to expand and increase its power. Whereupon it needs more levies to maintain itself – maybe that looks familiar to you? (A dissipative system)
Since not everyone was always able to produce the required amount of levy goods by the deadline, the subjects were forced to trade among themselves – thus division of labor and specialization developed. While some focused on the cultivation of food, others produced tools for the peasants or weapons for the rulers, for which they received the coveted levy in return, in order to pay off their debt to the ruler. Those who had no other option had to offer their labor (debt bondage, day laborers,…). Individuals in an economy based on the division of labor are practically forced to conclude contracts with others or to fulfil these contracts in order to obtain the required levy and to survive.
By the way, the invention of writing is – not as some people think – due to the preservation of knowledge – but to bookkeeping, as Babylonian cuneiform writings prove. It was a system for documenting the taxes already paid by the subjects. On small clay tablets it was recorded who had paid what amount of tax, which then was used instead of the levy itself – an early form of money without intrinsic value.
The ruler is ultimately the owner of his realm, which is the area he can protect and demarcate from others by force of arms. But he can cede his property, i.e. share it, by granting the subjects the right to private property and defending it against opponents with his military power. The subject can manage the property guaranteed to him by the ruler and trade with it and its proceeds to be able to pay the tribute. And, very important, he can lend on his property to obtain credit. However, if he remains in debt, the subordinate is punished, or his property is foreclosed.
Those who submit and agree to the rules (forcibly set by the ruler) to maintain the status quo are part of that state(!). Those who do not want to belong are left to their own devices without any rights and were thus doomed to death in the past – today statelessness is no longer even conceivable.
The described processes of the emergence of states, money and economy were the initial sparks for today’s global trade economy, which is still based on the assurance of property by the central powers. We see that state, property, money and economy form an indissoluble mesh and a state is always based on the exercise of power and the compulsion to pay a levy. A state can therefore never be based on voluntariness of all participants. Today, more than ever, it is clearly visible that the state apparatus must inevitably become ever larger and more inefficient and, in the final analysis, serves only self-preservation and not its inhabitants. Like any dissipative system, it will vanish someday – this is by the way, the reason why there are so many collapsed civilizations in history and ours will be no exception.
But the trigger for the economic dynamics in a ruling system – from the destruction of a moneyless solidarity community to a highly specialized society based on the division of labor with compulsory trade and individual liability – is solely the pressure to pay the levy to the state on time. The means to pay off this tax debt is money. Money therefore always documents a debt. First, the tax debt to the rulers and, building on this, the contract debt between private individuals. So money is only a debt repayment vehicle. If money exists, a debt must exist at the same time, which can be erased with this money. Money receives its value only by the underlying debt contract, it cannot have an “intrinsic value” detached from a terminally fixed debt.
With this description, the definition of money is suddenly very clear:
Money (usually uncountable, plural monies or moneys): A legally or socially binding conceptual contract of entitlement to wealth, void of intrinsic value, payable for all debts and taxes, and regulated in supply.
Here we close our circle to the primordial debt mentioned above. Only the obligation to surrender a commodity earned by performance to the state at the deadline in order to escape a sanction defines money and gives it a value. Without a deadline there would be no reason to generate money, and without scarcity at the deadline, it would be worthless. It must always be earned first by doing work. Money is a debt, which has to be repaid at a certain point in the future by doing work before that time has come.
To do work means energy must flow. As power is a measure of energy per unit of time, money is therefore actually a measure of power and thus more directly linked to energy than most people can imagine. So, it is absolutely true that energy drives the economy. How fortunate that we discovered fossil fuels, developed combustion engines, etc., to accelerate economic activity, technological progress, and trade exponentially. Fossil energy made our economy grow fast and big.
Our credit-based finance system made it possible to create money which is solely based on the promise to perform work, in order to be able to take advantage of it immediately or to start new economic activity with it. When the modern world started to decouple the financial system from the real economy, the problems began. And this is where it gets ugly: In order to provide the promised future work, energy will be needed. But because far too much credit was granted without taking into account the energy that will actually be available, a Ponzi scheme was kicked off with nothing but empty promises on future energy. The worldwide fantasy amounts of money are no longer matched by any economic output that can be provided in realistic terms – financial collapse is pre-programmed and with it collapses any economic activity driven by energy. At present, attempts are being made to conceal and delay this by all means.
We have bought with lazy money a claim on future energy and have already squandered everything today. When the fossil energy is depleted we will be left with much worthless money.
Our dissipative system aka “modern civilization” will soon not be able to pay off its primordial debt.
I hope that when the world ends, I can breathe a sigh of relief because there will be so much to look forward to.1
P.S. Since we have seen that every state, economy and money are based on oppression and force, all possible future states will be no exception. I see a backfall to small tribal solidary communities as the most promising concept for humanity to survive the coming hardship.
1From “Ein Buch für Keinen” (A book for no one) by Stefan Gruber. The bible of nihilism: How economic, ideological, social, biological and physical systems emerge and why they are doomed to fail. I would recommend this as a must read, but unfortunately, this masterpiece is only available in German.
un-Denial 
One point omitted is that biology plays a role. Hierarchy is a trait in social mammals, and we are not exempt. In small tribes, likely fewer than the 150 of Dunbar, maintaining trust and accurate feedback from one’s peers is possible. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunbar%27s_number
Barter with others in the group is subject to checks and balances. Even barter with other groups has feedback if encounters are somewhat regular. Cheating is thereby controlled or limited. Money and large scale populations reduces the feedback. Nasty cycles can develop.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Another aspect of human biology is that we aggressively deny our predicament and thus do not even discuss possible useful responses.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Agree. Reflexive self-consciousness (seems unique to us) enables creative rationalization of events. Also, 80%+ estimated of us believe in a skyhook on which we hang our uncertainty. This ‘mysticism’ was elaborated by Reg Morrison in his ’99 book. Forward by Lynn Margulis, co-developer of gaia theory with Lovelock.
https://innovation.cc/book-reviews/2000_5_2_9_kurtz_bk-rev_morrison_spirit-gene.htm
LikeLike
Thank you – yes of course biology plays a role in human societies. A mega city, where everyone is anonymous, is the perfect example, it only works with strict law enforcement. A small village, where everyone knows each other, regulates itself with an intrinsic moral codex.
But since I think biology was not a crucial point for the main topic, I left it out to not make an already complicated subject even more confusing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
When I started to read marromai’s essay my first thought was that writing was invented to record taxes.
I’m glad he mentioned that fact in his essay. It’s compelling evidence in support of his thesis.
It’s similar in kind to one of the unusual and unique things that emerged simultaneously with behaviorally modern humans. We denied death via religious rituals. No other animal does this. It’s a big clue for explaining why we can’t even discuss the ideas in marromai’s essay.
I’m of course not suggesting there’s a painless solution to our overshoot predicament. But the outcome of denying reality means everything we are doing today is steepening the backside of our Seneca cliff thus worsening the suffering that will eventually be experienced.
We could be acting to reduce total suffering but we are not.
We can’t even debate our options.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Marromai, this was excellent. Great to get exposure to ideas that haven’t been translated to English as well 🙂
LikeLike
You’re welcome – it’s very sad for me that the theory of Debitism (monetary theory based on the fact, that money, trade and everything is based on debt, which could be broken down to the primordial debt of each individual) is very unknown and not officially recognized.
It shares the same fate as the knowledge of our overshoot predicament, it is forbidden science.
As Paul C. Martin said: “The state dilemma is a non solvable one”
The fact that states and money are always based on force and oppression make it impossible to build a “good” state – Sooner or later every state must reveal its true violent nature.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sorry, forgot to enter the name – it was my comment 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLiked by 1 person
Another issue our leaders are silent on. Isn’t denial amazing?
LikeLiked by 1 person
A comment from a Moon of Alabama post.
https://www.moonofalabama.org/2023/06/ukraine-open-thread-2023-141.html
LikeLiked by 1 person
RFK Jr. on glyphosate.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I listened to the whole 3 hour interview and it was like being in a parallel universe where sanity still reigns and you’d be forgiven to feel more than a modicum of hope for America, but then the interview ended and poof, back to reality. I dare not hold my breath for what may happen by RFK Jr’s bold leap into the void but if I weren’t such a die-hard doomer now, I could almost imagine another tangent beginning from this point that could possibly lead to a more enlightened outcome before the still inevitable collapse.
Filled with such as it is denial-fueled optimism, I thought it the least I could do to show solidarity with TeamKennedy is to try continue reading his The Real Anthony Fauci, which I didn’t have the stamina to stomach the first time around. Big mistake. I’m into the AZT debacle and I literally feel physically sick from trying to digest the unmitigated malfeasance committed and then extrapolating it to the Covid chronicles. With my medical background I am not a stranger to the dubious workings of pharma and government, but the sheer blatancy of the corruption and complete absence of compunction to the level of deliberate infliction of suffering, viscerally floored me. We are all just pawns in this system and some have been played just to be destroyed, and at whim. I am saddened to report that I feel nothing but even more burden of doom knowing just what we are facing now hardwired into the system in which we are all entangled. Some days I pacify myself by thinking the sooner collapse happens, the sooner the chance for a world without Homo sapiens in dominion, and that can only equate with less suffering.
On another and more salubrious note, I have been working hard on the property here in the subtropics and actually relishing the sensations of muscle and sinew after a good day’s work. To have command of a physical body to be able to do such a range of actions is a true source of wonder and joy, and even pain is something I am now contemplating and absorbing with an awed humbleness. I’ve resumed a regular yoga practice to partake more of the awareness of how physical, mental and spiritual intersect in this organism that we call our own self and consciousness, totally unique for all time. In the days remaining to me I would like to nurture an elevated respect for and cherishing of this physical form that I have had the sole privilege to direct all the days I have lived. No longer do I take this body for granted, whatever its limitations and changes through the years is but a testament to how well it has carried and served, as a most companionable and loyal friend. I just wanted to share this latest revelation with the hope it may encourage any one to also cultivate gratitude and honor for their physical beingness, and how truly magnificent and magnanimous a gift it is.
And upon us is another Solstice, may it be a fulcrum to accept the changes that are upon us with courage and grace. Namaste, everyone.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I share many of your feelings.
Covid broke something in my spirit. It’s not so much that pharma is corrupt and evil. It’s that the majority of citizens don’t have a clue and don’t care, even if they were harmed by bad policies.
My latest angst comes from understanding that much of the recent obscene food price inflation was caused by money printing to counteract lockdowns that were never required had we employed wise policies.
RFK Jr. is a breath of fresh air but I predict the majority is too stupid to vote for him.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Canada’s population grew by 1 million via immigration over the last year and just passed 40 million.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah, ditto for Australia now gunning for 50 million people (currently at 27 million) in a last stage delusion to keep the Ponzi scheme economy from crumbling faster than it already is. Our federal banking morons keep beating the one-trick pony of raising interest rates to forestall inflation, to the tune of “if it doesn’t work 11 months in a row, we’ll keep at it until it does!” Where are the two brain cells needed to process the fact that if energy costs rise, then inflation of goods and services is the only sure repercussion? It’s not people spending too much that’s keeping prices of food and housing high, but ironically, people are spending to their limit and beyond because of the rational fear that next year it will be even more expensive. And our yearly 1 million new migrants that need immediate housing are an obvious cause for the demand in properties that keep driving the prices of both houses and rentals up, interest rates be damned, people just need a place to live. We can’t create that many new housing units year upon year, especially since the past few years have seen building companies fold one after another.
Our better than expected employment rate reflects the fact that many are now working 2 or 3 jobs just to make ends meet, and the way the stats work here, even just one hour of paid work a week is considered employment so in actuality, many have underemployment in terms of wage earning, although the numbers of people in the work force look robust. Which means more interest rate rises are coming since obviously too many people are working and making too much money so they’re spending too much and that’s where the inflation is coming from–GOT IT? I know totally understand how blindness in just about every aspect of existence is the human condition, but woe upon us if people truly could or would wake up and see.
LikeLiked by 3 people
LikeLiked by 1 person
This appears to be a very good site for current data on covid response harms.
It’s great to see people out there pushing hard to expose the evil and to bring justice to the criminals.
https://dksdata.com/COVID19
LikeLike
I wanted to share this comic as it rings very true when I see projected trends. For example when both Airbus and Boeing project that by 2042 the air fleet will be double of todays. Or GDP charts or population or … The list is quite long.
LikeLiked by 2 people
LOL! Very funny, and true.
My favorite is Dr. Tom Murphy’s calculation that 2.3% annual growth for 400 years will generate enough waste heat to boil water on the surface of the planet.
LikeLiked by 1 person
New report from Richard Heinberg and the Post Carbon Institute. I have not read it yet.
https://www.postcarbon.org/publications/welcome-to-the-great-unraveling/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Two years later we uncover the mathematical mistake (or fraudulent trickery) that made an ineffective vaccine appear effective.
If this was an honest mistake, how is it possible that our leaders have not yet pleaded mea culpa for the biggest health care blunder in history?
Perhaps it was not a mistake.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very nice essay. The only thing I might add, is that not only do most populations deny their bondage and oppression and such, but they have learned to call it “freedom”. They actually love it. This is understandable seeing that the vast majority could not, and will not, survive outside the confines of a State (glorified corral).
Biologically speaking, I think that most humans alive today are of a domsticated variety. Feral varieties may emerge after the resolution of the population bottleneck. Not sure.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you, that’s absolute right – we are anything but free, living a modern form of slavery where the slaves even don’t know that they are slaves.
Or to bring another quote from the mentioned “Book for no one”:
It is the irony of human history, as the philosopher of history Oswald Spengler also pointed out in analyzing declining civilizations, that the point at which people believe they possess lasting peace, lasting freedom, and lasting prosperity is closer to the abyss than any other point before.
LikeLike
US leaders are behaving VERY strange. Blinken goes to China, takes a beating from the Chinese and reconfirms the US one China policy, in an attempt to cool tensions between the superpowers. The next day his boss Biden blows it all up with inappropriate comments.
Nothing makes sense. It’s very worrying.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Rob,
Have you never had someone close with dementia? Both my parents died with Alzheimer (do you die from it or with it?). At the end neither knew who I was. Thankfully they had sufficient funds to pay for institutionalized care for the last year (it was still expensive at +$120K a year – 10 years ago). I saw them through every stage from early to late. Biden has all the hallmarks of early/middle stages (Sundowner syndrome, not remembering recent events, not keeping a cogent train of thought). Whoever is controlling him (wife & Obama White House surrogates) must be worried about everything he says/does and can he make it through the next election before a total intellectual collapse?
I already know that I will euthanize myself should I make it to 75 (doubt civilization will last 5 more years) as beyond that the odds are that I will start declining to the extent that I don’t want to take the chance at living in Alzheimer’s.
AJ
LikeLike
I’m sorry about your parents. I’ve not had any family members with dementia but the wife of a good friend is going through it now. It’s very rough on family members but the person with dementia does not seem to suffer.
Dementia might explain Biden and yet his inappropriate comments were published on the white house web site which suggests a power struggle over policy rather than a dementia blunder.
I’ve been thinking about the causes of big events in history. Some events, like WWI, have complex unclear causes. Others, like WWII and Hitler, have clear causes. If there are any historians still alive after WWIII I think they’ll agree that the US and NATO caused the war.
LikeLike
Hi all
View at Medium.com
Some of you might enjoy this article summarising the climate change situation. It’s got a lot of the basics, with some interesting bits of denial in it as well. “Like the earth isn’t overpopulated but a multi-bread basket failure could kill a billion people” (hmm sounds like overpopulation to me)..
Another humdinger: “This article by Bill Rees is titled Yes, the Climate Crisis May Wipe out Six Billion People: “a climate symposium organized to discuss the implications of a 4C warmer world concluded, “Less than a billion people will survive.” Here Schellnhuber is quoted as saying: “At 4C Earth’s… carrying capacity estimates are below 1 billion people.”
…. The earth’s carrying capacity without fossil fuels is below a billion anyway so. The threat of continuing to burn fossil fuels is the same outcome as stopping burning fossil fuels. WASTF
Michael Dowd did a recording of the article here: https://soundcloud.com/michael-dowd-grace-limits/sam-hall-the-busy-workers-handbook-to-the-apocalypse
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks monk. It’s easy to get lost in a sea of complexity on overshoot. For me it’s clear we’re already in big trouble.
We’ve raised the temperature by about 1C and that’s been enough to to melt the poles locking in 10M sea level rise, to cause extreme weather, to disrupt ocean life, and to burn the forests.
The CO2 we’ve already emitted will raise the temperature by about another 1C.
Stopping further CO2 emissions would kill about 7 billion people because almost all necessities of life depend on fossil energy.
If we try to continue BAU, affordable fossil energy will be depleted by about 50% in less than 10 years, killing roughly 3 billion. Population will then continue to trend down via war, starvation, and disease as the fossils fully deplete over the next 40 years.
The only wise path is population reduction and yet 99.9% can’t see this obvious conclusion thanks to genetic denial.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Dear Rob,
It is indeed excruciatingly sad to understand the dynamic of society, see where this ultimately leads and not being able to convince people to anticipate. I agree that managing decline, and even better consciously achieve balance at a planetary level sounds the most alluring.
However, I also believe this is not going to happen this time: rapid collapse is now baked in (I guess in the same way that yesterday’s debt is today’s inflation).
It happened before with other civilizations, it will happen again this time.
However, I now still take solace in two (maybe opposite) considerations. Let me share them with you. Maybe you will enjoy these alternative ways of framing current events.
On the one hand, it seems to me that every time we understand a phenomena and try to control it, then it backfires a little bit later down the road (the road to hell is indeed paved with good intentions). So maybe, it would not turn out to be such a good idea to consciously control our breeding behaviour: maybe it would, for instance, ultimately result in the species degenerescence (or some other unexpected outcome). Then once this new problem would be later acknowledged, we could try again to “fix” it, or just be overwhelmed by it and let it be fixed by itself. So trying to fix problems/predicaments, is in a way still going in the same direction: kicking down the can. Why not trust nature and let it do its thing: boom/bust is maybe the natural respiration cycle of civilisation.
On the other opposite hand, today is maybe another failed attempt by life on earth to integrate at the planetary level. We see it as a failure, but it is not the first and every time is the same yet slightly different. Maybe at some level, life is capitalizing experience and at some point it will achieve planetary level consciousness. So it may be a learning mechanism (through experiments and then triage) towards the slow rise of Gaïa.
I guess the first interpretation is more “native” (acceptance of natural cycles) and the second is more modern (growth oriented). These are two opposite views that both let us contemplate current events with joy. Because, truly, we don’t know: this plays at a far bigger level than it is for us to understand.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Charles, you are right that most actions we take have some negative side effect. Given that a smaller population improves every one of the thousands of problems we have created it’s hard for me to imagine that any side effects could be worse. But I do agree that accepting that things will happen as nature decides will probably lead to a happier life.
On your second idea, I can’t think of an example of life trying to integrate and failing in the past. What events are you thinking of?
I also don’t understand how our domination of the planet today can be viewed as an attempt to integrate all life. Rather than integrate, it seems we are attempting to consume all life.
LikeLike
Hello Rob,
It took me some time to respond: I was waiting for you to be back and then I went to the countryside to plant some trees and tend for some others.
First, let me acknowledge my post was not supposed to be 100% rational and proof based. Its main goal was to to cheer you up, taking you away from the nuclear extinction considerations. And here we are today, having dodged, for now twice the nuclear misstep: after the air defender exercise and then the Zaporizhia threats/blackmails. For that, I am grateful.
Also, having lived through these mental loops for quite some time, I have discovered one can easily equally chose to experience every news negatively or positively. However, if one is truly honest about it: we don’t know whether anything is to be considered negatively or positively. The world is as it is. And I now prefer to take the stance that it is perfect, following its own optimum. Even though, it is beyond my reach to understand.
To answer your specific questions. Yes a smaller population could decrease the “problems we have created”. Or so it seems inside our heads within the little simple model we build to think about it.
First that’s only one way of framing it, an interpretation isn’t it? And a very engineer type of interpretation. Who is this “we”? What was really created? Why label them as problems? Water wets, fire burns, that’s it. How can the waves and the flames be responsible or even in control?
Second, that’s just intuition, but I believe that if we kept our population low enough to keep a buffer for the environment to strive (if such duality is even meaningful), then we would soon go extinct. As I see it, death is a necessary phase for evolution: generate combinations and then eliminate the unviable. To me that’s the way the species constantly explores its full adaptative space. There must be a surplus and it must be culled at some point. To me, that’s how healthy individuals are perpetuated through the ages. And, I am not very convinced by the goods of modern medicine in the long run. For instance, what are the true long term evolutionary implications of caesarean section, vaccination, aesthetic surgery and even brushing one’s teeth? (From personal experience, I have noticed the considerable difference in tooth quality between asians and europeans. That is of course, in general. Is this related to population density, to nutrition? I have come to the conclusion that life optimises itself all the time to any condition. And it goes in both directions: why invest energy in strong teeth if you can perpetuate without, why have a good memory when there are search engines…)
About the second idea: life integration at a planetary level. That’s a poetic intuition of mine. It most probably originates from this presentation by professor Tim Lenton. Specifically here (https://youtu.be/4_Rao6GR4Z4?t=217) and there (https://youtu.be/4_Rao6GR4Z4?t=480). We are on the verge of collapse, maybe extinction, but that may also be a point were life progresses on the planet. If I were to take it further into science fiction, I view mushroom networks as the underground brain of Gaïa, we, with cities, internet (and maybe our dreams) are mobile aboveground elements of this same brain.
About the previous failed integrations, I was referring to previous civilizations that overshoot. Of course, for now it seems that we are trying to consume all life. But weren’t the first successful organisms with photosynthesis also a problem at first (the oxygen revolution)? To me, the reason we seem to be trying to destroy all life is because we haven’t fully recognized that our life depends on other life. And that’s mainly because, for now, it doesn’t (there are still enough life working processes and enough stock energy to sustain us). But, this is shifting, quickly. We will both balance ourselves (letting forest grow in part because only trees will feed us in drought-ridden regions, regulating extractive and waste generating industrial processes) and be forced by external factors (for instance recurrent floods will quickly corrode cities once we don’t have enough energy for full maintenance).
I love change 🙂
Anyway, we are maybe just following some kind of pattern like the fairy rings (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairy_ring) which grow outward at the speed they exhaust nutrients.
Or to have another analogy, this is maybe just like the “game of life” (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conway%27s_Game_of_Life, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2vgICfQawE). Let us enjoy the arbitrarily complex pretty patterns life is generating for its own enjoyment.
LikeLike
Forest fires across Canada this year are at their highest area. Fighting fires requires and enormous amount of fossil fuels and cost. It’s one example of the climate change predicament we are in. I live above the Kootenay River near Nelson BC in what is called the Interior cedar hemlock zone or interior rainforest. Every day I look at a mountain across from me where about 10-20% of the mature trees are dead from drought stress while many more are turning red on the way to dying. Our forests are rapidly becoming a carbon source rather than a living ecosystem that absorbs carbon. If this trend remains it will also impact Forest regeneration after logging as seedlings can’t survive dry springs and weeks of 30 degree plus weather. Another effect we collectively are denying.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I smell an imminent false flag event that could trigger WWIII.
My take:
1) Russia is decisively winning against all that NATO can muster.
2) Ukraine is desperate for NATO engagement and US is panicking about imminent loss.
3) Ukraine is warning that Russia intends to blow up a nuclear power plant that Russia controls and is defending. This is crazy talk similar to Russia blowing up it’s own pipeline.
4) US leaders are warning Russia that any nuclear event in Ukraine will trigger a nuclear attack by NATO on Russia.
All we need now is for Ukraine to explode a dirty bomb near the nuclear power plant and to blame Russia.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sadly I think you are right.
We live a fraction of a second away from Nuclear Winter/extinction of the planet and our (U.S.) leaders think that is ok. Homo stupidus.
AJ
LikeLiked by 2 people
Nate Hagens today discusses the challenges of creating a podcast about overshoot. Once again he discusses everything except what matters. I left the following comment:
LikeLiked by 1 person
I actually found his tone and commentary kind of rude. Like he was saying us poor plebs are too dumb to handle the truth. I get so sick of the arrogance of academics. Like bro we know the financial system is going down and the population will end up back at less than a billion.
The idea that Nate could make a self-fulfilling prophecy with an audience of 40,000 people is silly. Plenty of commentators have pointed out we are in the mother of all financial bubbles and it will collapse at some point. Prominent financial analysts like Doug Noland have been calling it for ages, and still no bank run or similar has been triggered.
Having followed the peak oil and environmental scene since 2014, I have come to the conclusion that retired professionals are much more useful than academics. Often these people have figured stuff out decades before an academic turns the idea into a published paper.
I think there is more than enough 101 content out there (Nate’s original series, Chris’ crash course, JMG’s collapse now and avoid the rush). If these guys want to continue being helpful, they need to progress with their analysis. We are in the collapse now. I’d suggest now is the time to tell people why things are bad, give clear indication it will get worse, and try and guide people to the best actions to take now.
The whole Covid pandemic was a classic example of “leaders” treating the general population like children. It didn’t work. You have to respect adults as adults. When times get tough, leaders need to tell adults – we expect you to stand up, grow up, and make tough decisions. You’re on your own kid, rise to the challenge, don’t wait for the govt to save you
LikeLiked by 2 people
Excellent rant. All good points.
Rogan with his millions of viewers has triggered no progress on criminal proceedings against Fauci. Hagens shouldn’t worry and should simply speak the truth.
LikeLiked by 1 person
exactly!
LikeLike
Good podcast, sadly I’m in the group that thinks nuke war is above a 50% possibility and financial collapse/civilizational collapse brings us up to 90%, with an addition of 10% due to biophysical collapse (global warming, resource limits), there is no hope. I just want to be dead before it happens.
The only thing is to reduce suffering for those remaining or coming after us, so you are spot on Rob.
AJ
LikeLiked by 1 person
Mac10 today…
https://zensecondlife.blogspot.com/2023/06/technological-meltdown.html
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow,
I always thought Mac10 was basically a economic guy and was civilizational collapse unaware (maybe a few subtle hints of awareness?).
The first two paragraphs you copied above were full on awareness that the fault is probable in our genes. Too many of us and too much hubris (even poor Ted thought it was tech’s problem) in our own wisdom – homo stupidus.
Not sure Mac10 sees the energy angle or the problems with monkeys with nukes, but he sees an end – so not totally in denial.
I thought Tim Watkins was pretty spot-on about our hubris and where that leads today. https://consciousnessofsheep.co.uk/2023/06/23/titan-a-reflection-of-our-insanity/
AJ
LikeLiked by 3 people
that article was excellent!
LikeLike
Chris Martenson is jumping into the peak oil deep end with his YouTube audience.
Curious minds want to know, will his subscriptions grow or shrink?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Does anyone know how many subscribers he has? At $30 per month, even a thousand could bring in a fair amount but it’s probably many thousands.
Nothing to do with the video but I wonder why he seems to have put all the weight he lost back on again.
There isn’t anything in this video that most of us didn’t already know. I’m not inclined to join up to watch the members-only follow up.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve paid for a subscription off and on, and it’s not that good of value for money. Also he goes a lot more down the global elite conspiracy track in the private videos
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, he likes to blame central banks for our problems. I’m sure he knows better but it sells because people don’t want to hear they need to consume less.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I paid for a subscription once,, just for a month. I wasn’t impressed, though that was some time ago. I think a lot of these bloggers actually believe that there is some way out of this mess, if only governments could do the right things.
For this particular video. So what, if we could actually put on our energy goggles? What would we do differently? Probably nothing. What does Martenson do differently? Well, he’s severely restricted access to his site unless you pay him quite a bit of money. So he’s clearly got the energy goggle on.
LikeLiked by 1 person
He’s hoarding to survive the contraction. That makes logical sense from a self-preservation point of view. Got to pay his mortgage for the off grid homestead too
LikeLike
What’s going on in Russia is very murky. This explanation by Simplicius the Thinker is the best discussion of the murkiness I’ve seen.
https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/prigozhins-siege-ends-postmortem
LikeLiked by 1 person
Momentum and evidence for a false flag is building.
https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/nuclear-falseflag-on-zaporozhye-npp
LikeLike
Just for fun really. Predictions!
I’ve thought about creating a running list of predictions for collapse. It’s a bit tricky because I’m not very knowledgeable on climate change. So, ignoring most climate change stuff and the over-talked financial bubble situation, here’s some other things I’ve been thinking about.
• Collapse of certain industries that are relatively new, such as early childcare education. See this article for a taster. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2023/may/25/one-in-10-childcare-providers-in-england-likely-to-close-official-report-finds.
• Healthcare will continue to worsen. It is surprisingly hard in NZ to get a doctor’s appointment. I’m in this boat too. https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300755643/a-million-kiwis-each-year-are-struggling-to-see-their-doctor–ive-yet-to-meet-mine
• There will be a crisis of care for the elderly. More pressure for support will fall on their younger family members who are already working long hours.
• Global trade moves to super-region trade.
• War is likely. But it will be different than WW1 and WW2 because some countries will be more nervous about churning young people. Two exceptions might be India and China who have excessive male populations due to sex-selection abortions.
• It will get tougher for local authorities to recover from successive environmental disasters. This will be a combination of increasing disaster frequency, plus the rapidly rising costs of labour and materials. Insurance companies will continue abandoning whole communities. https://www.insurance.com/home-and-renters-insurance/home-insurers-leaving-florida
• It will get harder for local authorities and speciality regulators to enforce the growing bureaucracy of rules and regulations due to a lack of staff and resources. This will create both problems and opportunities.
• The declining volume of fresh water from the Himalayas may spark a regional conflict. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/6/20/himalayan-glaciers-may-lose-75-percent-of-ice-by-2100-report
• Rural power supply, roading, and other services will decline. Rural people were the last to see development and will be the first to lose it. Roading especially is failing due to end of design life. Authorities will start considering turning roads back to gravel/shingle and maybe some bridges won’t be rebuilt. Rural people in first world countries are not self-sufficient like they were 50 years ago.
Here’s an article from New Zealand, but the USA and others are in a similar situation. https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2022/11/nearly-third-of-new-zealand-s-entire-roading-network-past-its-lifespan.html
• Transgender “healthcare” will be abandoned soon due to lawsuits and increasing pressure on limited healthcare budgets. Here’s an example from the UK https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-62335665
• I expect mobile phones will be an exception to the trend of collapse, at least for a while. We will hang on to our phones for as long as possible. Maybe those older phones in the top draw will get a second go at life. Mobile phones are ubiquitous in a way computers never were and are so incredibly useful. Even the poorest people in the world find a way to get a phone and get connected.
• I predict that moral views will become more conservative over the next 10 years, but they’ll be different from past values that were labelled ‘conservative’. I’m seeing this trend on the fringes with vegan hippies turning into a new kind of meat-eating conservative.
• Trends in infant mortality and maternal death will start to increase.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t disagree with anything on your list.
These days I consider all products and services that are complex to produce and/or have a high energy input and/or are discretionary for survival as being likely to be soon less available and less affordable.
For most of us this list is very long.
I worry most about food, diesel, and war.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Monk (upper SI?), I like you list idea and agree that mobiles will be held close, trinkets of the techno age, even with the cracked screens. ‘We’ will also continue to fawn over sports and singers as it is a destraction to Rome burning. As an aside, the more ‘adventure’ tourists (read billionaires) that go to unexpected dangerous locations the better as Darwin should sort a few of these people out!
Cost of private insurance and reinsurance will go up substantially, to the point that many have already or will start letting these policies lapse. Then with increased natural/weather events, a greater proportion of people will be further impoverished as well as the continued infrastructural decline you mention. This places an even larger onus on the state to help out (Ruapehu Alpine Lifts, Gisborne & Akld floods). Waterways, sewer systems and the natural environment will naturally detriorate.
Most retail/service SME’s (main streets, malls) will close without further govt support leaving vacant commercial premises which will deteriorate under a lack of maintenance. The only businesses that remain are those of scale that have acquired share through the asset grab of the last 15 years.
Mental health issues will exacerbate be it anxiety, depression, or anger/violence.
Again, the state trying to promote migration and condensed living within the urban centres, alongside increased regulation and beauracracy on larger numbers of poverty stricken people will just lead to higher levels of crime – theft, burglary.
Jobs ‘under the table’ will increase again as people supplement any income however they can although within one generation we seem to have lost a lot of that self sufficiency that used to be so prevalent.
Cheers Kin (lower NI)
p.s. I dislike when people (Nate) says ‘I know some seriously important things but I can’t tell you, I can’t let it out’. Well just don’t mention anything then – leave that sentence out, saying that comes across as being pretentious.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks for the reply – all very good points.
I’m in mid SI 🙂
On your P.S. yes! I absolutely hate it too haha
LikeLike
Some fun reading for this evening, shared by Nicole Foss on Facebook: Complex Systems Won’t Survive the Competence Crisis
https://www.palladiummag.com/2023/06/01/complex-systems-wont-survive-the-competence-crisis/?fbclid=IwAR2NIstVLUrMoVaBxfusHO7JaCC-uuGomMGm-MB4IEePtmLUCgu1hdJC-jw
LikeLike
Thanks. The article argues that complex systems are failing because our policies prioritize diversity over competency.
That’s probably true, especially in the US, which is still struggling to recover from its slavery foundation, but I think there are other causes of failing systems and falling competency such as:
The article would have been more persuasive had it listed all the possible causes and then presented data to show diversity policies are the primary factor.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yea I was disappointed with the article. I thought it would cover more stuff than just complaining about diversity
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree, one can’t place the blame for the collapse of complex systems at the feet of diversity… We’ve built out everything with cheap, abundant fossil energy, and now have to keep it running with increasingly expensive, less plentiful energy. Add in financialization, manufacture offshoring for wage arbitrage, automation, planned obsolescence, shredding the social safety net, private equity predation, corporate corner-cutting, etc., and you have the ingredients for all-around breakdown.
LikeLiked by 1 person
They could have also covered idiotic rules, management practices, and dysfunctional organisational structures
LikeLike
https://philosophynow.org/issues/45/The_Last_Messiah
I’ve been looking through the contents of this blog for the last few days. All good stuff, but I haven’t seen any reference Peter Zapffe. In 1933 Zapffe wrote an essay called “The Last Messiah”. In this essay he outlines the psychological methods that humans use to effect denial of the nature of their existence. His final conclusion and recommendation is voluntary extinction, an idea that I’m certainly on board with.
I thought that some here might enjoy it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the introduction to Zapffe. It would be interesting to look for synergies and conflicts with Varki’s MORT theory.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good one by MB. There is nothing to gain.
LikeLike
Dave Allen on religion!
Saludos
el mar
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hilarious!
LikeLike
Damn. Martin Butler is more depressing than I am.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nine months after peak vaccination birthrates fell 10% which is the biggest decline in 100 years.
Hell of a way to implement the overshoot harm reduction policy we desperately need.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ruRQ8diztzw
LikeLiked by 1 person
Martenson does not see a silver lining in a dark cloud.
Sometimes I feel like I’m the only public doomer that has sufficiently broken denial genes to speak the truth.
Might explain why I’m the public doomer with the smallest audience.
LikeLiked by 2 people
But Rob and friends, it’s all about quality not quantity! Just wanted to quickly insert here that I’ve been faithfully taking my usual daily dose of this wonderful blogspace and very appreciative of all the excellent contributions as always.
Been flat out pruning and mulching trees and just enjoying being outdoors in the sunshine. Every day is a bonus–it has always been thus but ever more poignant now.
All the best to you and your families.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I had a cycle interruption after my second vax. I use an app to track my cycle so have very good data and was a clear disruption. If you had a bunch of women’s cycle mucked up for a couple of months, that would reduce births by a lot
LikeLike
So you think it is a blip rather than a chronic problem?
LikeLike
Yes I do. In NZ that was the medical advice as well. The vaccine causes cycle disruption. I read on Reddit some women it took months for their cycle to come back, others just experienced a missed cycle (period didn’t come for a month or so). Menstrual disruption was around 30th most common symptom in our register for vaccine side effects. If you had lots of women miss ovulation for a couple months, that’s a lot of pregnancies not happening.
We also should take Chris’ point that if it caused cycle disruption, it could have caused longer lasting issues as well – give it another year and we’ll be able to tell.
Getting vaccinated while already pregnant may have been a lot worse….I dunno
LikeLiked by 1 person
Click to access Thermodynamics_of_evolution.pdf
Extract, Page 130:
The reader would have acknowledged that the conclusions of the report are
also consistent with the laws of thermodynamics we have described. As
Georgescu Roegen recalled us, while dissipating energy, mankind inevitably
modify its environment. One now knows that the more it modifies its
environment the faster it must readapt. Figure 14 shows that it is already no
longer able to readapt fast enough to avoid a collapse of the population level
around 2030. It is indeed the Red Queen effect in biology or the process of
self-organized criticality in physics.
Evidence for this process is clearly shown by the numerical simulations of the
Meadows report. Evidence can also be seen locally all along the history of
mankind, not only in the West (chapter 14), but also on the american
continent with the examples of the Anasazi or Maya civilizations. The most
spectacular example of collapse is undoubtedly that of Easter Island (Rapa
Nui) in the Pacific Ocean. For a description of these events, I refer the reader
to the literature on these subjects (51). In every cases, it seems that a ruling
class has attempted to maintain economic growth, producing irreversible
transformations of the environment that proved to be fatal for the concerned
civilisation (52).
Given these exemples, the collapse of our current civilisations seems highly
probable, this time at the scale of the whole globe.
LikeLike
Nice find.
About François Roddier
LikeLiked by 1 person
What do you think of the idea of sovereign money? I think it is certainly better than the debt based Ponzi scheme as long as it is tethered to the real economy. https://positivemoney.org/our-proposals/sovereign-money-introduction/.
I think it could help mitigate the problems mitigated in this paper by David Korowicz. https://www.feasta.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Trade_Off_Korowicz.pdf
LikeLike
The paper’s too long for me to read in full so my comments are made without a full understanding.
It looks like they propose:
1) moving responsibility of money creation from banks to the state
2) creating money via “printing” rather than lending
Benefits I see include reducing the power of banks, increasing the power of governments to direct funds to socially desirable purposes, and having a monetary system that does not blow up when growth stops due to resource depletion.
It does not seem to address a core problem that exists in both our current system and this proposed sovereign system.
How do you prevent political forces from increasing the money supply faster than the real economy grows thus creating inflation that destroys civil society?
I personally favor a full reserve energy backed monetary system entrenched in the constitution. The money supply would track available energy and we would be forced to live within our means with no ability for politicians to play dangerous games. This system would mean a lower standard of living in the short term, but it would be stable in the long term time with fewer nasty civil wars and revolutions.
LikeLike
I think the proposal to change the monetary system confuses cause and effect. One would have to change or abolish the present ruling system, which is no longer possible because of its complexity. Because complex systems are doomed to perish from their own complexity (Tainter) – your second link describes the symptoms of this.
As I have tried to explain, money comes into the world only through the state, i.e. through force, oppression and coercion. Banks are only instruments of the beneficiaries and a consequence of the ever more complex differentiation of the economy based on the division of labor, but not the actual cause of the capitalist system. It was the state’s compulsion to trade that produced the division of labor and the compulsion to pay taxes gives money its value.
As long as we have a state, we have money based on debt. And without state coercion, money has no value. A commodity cover does not change this fact.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think I understand your argument that money based on debt is not optional. Do you believe a fraction reserve system is not optional? Put another way, is it possible to have a full reserve monetary system?
I believe it is the fractional reserve nature of our system that has enabled our extreme state of overshoot and has created the Seneca cliff we face.
LikeLike
Hello Rob,
I still owe you an answer for the question about the monetary system.
Basically, we don’t have any reserve left in the monetary system. This enabled the enormous exponential growth. The step-by-step reduction of the reserve and its final abolishment were necessary to avoid crises, which increased the falling height for the coming final crisis.
I stumbled upon this thread today, which explains why a gold standard or full reserve system wouln’t be a solution for the capitalistic system. It was the author of the “Book for no one”, who wrote this prior to the release of his book in a German forum about debitism.
https://archiv1.dasgelbeforum.net/index.php?id=297450
(Shortended by marromai and translated with deepl.com)
What is “real value”? When you are hungry, gold is just as worthless as paper.
Why did gold have any value at all under the gold standard beyond its use for jewelry?
It was never a medium of exchange, so gold has never been chosen as money in stateless societies (because there was no money at all). The state demanded it as a tax, that’s why it was demanded, that’s why it had value (because it had to go to the state at the tax deadline), and that’s why it created prices (ratios measured in gold). It was simply declared money by the state power and thats it.
But why do people believe in a universal value of gold?
Because there is a millennia-old tradition in which gold was declared money by the state for practical reasons. This is also where today’s belief(!) in a value comes from. Only the belief gives it its value. Exactly what the fiat money apostles thus permanently claim of credit money (“it is not covered by anything and thus worthless”) applies to a much greater extent to gold (outside of a gold standard). “Fiat money” is at least covered by the collateral you deposit with the bank when creating the loan and the associated promise of performance.
What are “real values” then? The bank primarily liquefies your property that you offer as collateral. So that part of the money is backed by the pledged property (and the banknotes on top of are backed by your future performance or the promise to pay it back by performing). Under the gold standard, it was exactly the same. The only difference was that there was an artificial limit; for example, with a gold cover of 10%, only 90% more fiat money could be created than there was gold.
Prices are created in the first place by mortgaging your property (e.g. your house) when you take out a loan, i.e. it is expressed in monetary units. Example: You go to the bank, pledge your house and get 100 units of money in return. Thus, your house is suddenly worth 100 units of money…so with these 100 units, your house can be bought and this is how the price relations to other goods and services are formed in the first place. There is no value in itself, because there is also no money net, with which then is “exchanged”. Money always only pays debt. Completely no matter whether it consists of paper or of gold or of bits and bytes.
Gold was only a means of repaying debt because it was legal tender. Net money (gold without debt counter entry, which is exchanged), creates no prices. There must be a good that MUST be demanded (e.g. because the state demands it as a tax) and only after that it is managed at all to get this good. There has never been a barter economy and in principle there cannot be one.
The gold deposit of the money acted only as a brake for credit growth, nothing more. It backs the money system with something that cannot be multiplied endlessly, which is why deflation permanently hangs over it as the sword of Damocles. Since debt must always grow under capitalism in order to avoid deflationary crises, this brake had to be removed. The softening and then abolition of the gold standard was a perfectly logical step from the state’s point of view (preservation of power). Gold standard means: crises at shorter intervals, but with a smaller drop. Abolition of the gold standard means: crises at longer intervals, but with a greater fall height. In any case, a paradisiacal crisis-free economic area exists only in the wet dreams of equilibrium theorists.
That’s called capitalism, and the main driver is debt pressure and the compulsion for economic and debt growth. If you think you can save the world with a gold standard, you are on the wrong track. One man’s debt is another man’s credit. One man’s wealth is another man’s poverty. That’s the system, whether it marches on paper or gold (you just ruin the planet faster with paper).
“Gold is money, everything else is credit.” (J. P. Morgan)
This is a favorite phrase of the gold bugs, Mr. Morgan said it when there was still a gold standard and he was absolutely right then. Only this gold is worth nothing without credit, because only the credit and the pledges under it give it a value. If all loans were settled, gold would be worthless even on the gold standard.
Today the sentence would have to read: “Only property is money, everything else is credit”.
If all credits were settled, there would be no more money and thus no more price for property.
LikeLike
Thanks. I continue to wonder if we can retain the best aspects of our economy and simply change the monetary and taxation systems to something that does not blow up by design, and that is tethered to biophysical and social cohesion limits.
Before discussing an issue like this we must agree on the definition of capitalism.
My definition is:
– contract law enforced by a fair legal system
– property rights enforced by a fair legal system
– a reasonable portion of profits untaxed as incentive and reward for risk, skill, and hard work
– prices set by by the market forces of supply and demand
My definition of capitalism does not require or imply:
– externalized environmental costs
– infinite growth on a finite planet
– extreme wealth inequality
– debt that grows faster than the real economy (aka fraction reserve monetary system)
Wikipedia seems to agree with my definition, although it uses many more complicated words. Note that Wikipedia does not even mention monetary system or capital gain tax requirements.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalism
It looks to me like you have a different definition of capitalism. What is your definition?
LikeLike
Hello Rob,
basically I like your definition of capitalism and go along with the description – for the economic part.
You say it yourself, a defined legal framework is needed as a prerequisite for any kind of economic activity, since economic activity either takes place as enforceable fulfillment of contracts or not at all. This presupposes in capitalism as well as in socialism and in every other system – except anarchy – a superimposed power system that provides this legal framework. The problem lies in the “fair” part, because power corrupts. The power system will always act to its advantage in order to maintain and enlarge itself (dissipative system).
Same for the economic part, a deliberate imbalance is needed: The interest rate for lending money (without which no one would give credit and therefore no economic activity would start at all) looks like the trigger for a Ponzi scheme, which automatically ends in demand for infinite growth, due to its exponetial nature.
As I cited Paul C. Martin in an earlier comment: “The dilemma of the state is a non solvable one.” There is no such thing as a perfect State. And even if it would seem so for a moment, this would not hold long, since there is no such thing as perfect equilibrium.
LikeLike
Results of a poll by Elliot Jacobson on Twitter (18000 Votes) appears to suggest strongly that the problem is not overpopulation/overshoot. It’s either beastly capitalism/the 1% or the fossil fuel companies. (seem to be unable to post a copy).
Elliot is a self proclaimed doomer and yet his audience just don’t get it. They appear to need a villain to blame (so we can do something about it?)and can’t accept that it’s denial of our basic
nature. We all, by and large, want to dissipate as much energy as possible in every way possible and as cheaply as possible-it’s our task (thanks James). This inevitably leads to overshoot/overpopulation.
Talk about not seeing the wood for the trees.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I guess that you’re refering to James @ megacancer.com. I know that he was the first to point out to me the parallels between cellular metabolism and human activity in general. I believe his analysis holds up well.
Rodiere, of course, demonstrates the ratcheting action of evolution writ large. All matter, including “living matter”, will attempt to arrange itself in accordance with the dictates of the MPP.
I wish I had something pithy to add to James and Rodiere, but I don’t. So I’ll just say:
We’re just like RNA in a cell, arranging molecular substrate to make enzymes and such (tools and such), to act on other molecules in order to release their bound energy, to the putative benefit of the cell. We do it all unconsiously, completely in the dark.
I have to think that denial has little to do with the process. Even if we were somehow completely aware of our efforts. We somehow knew without a doubt that if we continue in this process the cell, and the body in which it resides, will eventually fall apart and die.
I guess that the paradox might be is that we do “know”. We all know that we will die, undeniably. That’s exactly why we have to continue doing what we do, as hard as we can, as fast as we can. Out with the old, in with the new. Make room for something bigger, faster and better. That’s what we’re here for. I’d say.
I’d also say that we’re completely in the dark, with no light in sight. That which through-puts the most energy the fastest (MPP), wins.
Something like that…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I respect James’ work. I think his story is a valid and insightful way to explain overshoot.
I prefer the simpler analogous story that life is governed by the MPP because the “goal” of every replicator (like DNA/RNA) is to become two replicators.
I disagree with your point that denial has no role in this process.
Humans are the only species with sufficient intelligence to understand replicators, MPP, overshoot, etc.. The “goal” of human replicators would be better served by constraining our population and consumption, but that would violate the MPP.
My hypothesis is that genes will not (can not?) permit MPP to be violated and therefore the only way for a high intelligence (that could override MPP) to emerge in the universe is to simultaneously evolve a tendency to deny unpleasant realities so that MPP continues to operate, despite sufficient intelligence to know better.
This leads to the conclusion that high intelligence will be vanishingly rare in the universe and we should be in awe of our gig.
Doubly so that we are alive to witness the brief peak of what may be possible in the universe.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I highly doubt that there is any high intelligence (in the way you describe it) in the universe. From what is known of evolution, I just can’t see that happening. Anywhere.
LikeLike
Which means aliens visiting us is nonsense (for other reasons too).
LikeLike
Absolutely, Rob. I used to help out a UFO investigation group when I was much younger, in my 20s. But I’m now convinced that no aliens could develop the technology to leave their own star system and actually do so. Nor will we. Heck, we won’t even develop a “permanent” base on any other planet or moon. I’m appalled at the money and resources that goes into trying to do so.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Head shaking sadly…
LikeLiked by 2 people
Overpopulation/Overshoot is the correct answer but Big Oil and the Capitalism are not innocent either. Exxon downplayed and denied climate science for decades even though their own scientists knew better. Capitalism encourages behaviors that worsen overshoot.
Someone responded
@OtherPercent is missing the point entirely.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Population collapse is what happens to species that overshoot carrying capacity.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Hey I wrote a comment before to this which didn’t upload – so I’ll make a shorter point. Much of the doomer/environmental/climate aware space is full of what I affectionately call “idealistic idiotic lefties”. They believe in getting to utopia or that we used to be in a utopia. What’s in our way is the evil capitalists. If we could defeat the evil, we could have our utopia. I agree with JMG that this is a re-hash of Christian mythology – the good people deserve heaven and the devil gets in the way. It’s an idealistic view not attached to reality. It allows people to believe insane things like all companies are evil while completing depending on said companies to stay alive. For the record, I don’t think there’s anything wrong with sensible left-wing policies, and many of the policies I like are left-leaning. I just think the idealistic lefty analysis is terrible and when taken to extremes it is dangerous (like ‘lets kill all the farmers’)
LikeLike
And because I like lists, here’s the sort of things idealistic idiotic lefties do and say:
– Worries about cow farts more than Portland cement, electricity production, private jets and yachts.
– Believes in net zero, tail pipe emissions, and hydrogen.
– Thinks that talking about overpopulation is racist.
– Refuses to accept that GDP reduction is the only thing that reduces global emissions. I.e., the “solution” to climate change is a crushing depression that lasts forever.
– Has a degree and above average income but complains they are an oppressed class.
– Thinks it’s easy to cycle everywhere because they live in a central suburb.
– Tells you Jevon’s Paradox is a myth *eye roll.
– Might idealise the past and think it is easy to live off grid / off the land.
– Ignores historical facts about indigenous peoples that doesn’t fit in their narrative.
– Will burn a down a tree and call that reducing carbon emissions. (biofuel electricity).
– Gives you a blank look when you mention human carrying capacity.
– Only talks about the parts of human nature that suit the narrative like greed; but won’t acknowledge say denial.
– Honestly seems to believe that if we got rid of all the rich people, no new rich people will come up and take their place.
– Talks about ‘climate justice’ or ‘just transition’. Thinks we can lift people out of poverty while decreasing energy use. Like WTAF read a history book. I’m not saying we should just sit back and let the poorest people suffer needlessly but there’s just an idiocy here to do with actual resource availability.
– Has a naïve view of war. For the winners, war makes sense from a genetic and resource point of view. You can understand why war makes sense without agreeing with war. But it puts you in a much better place to understand strategy and offer meaningful analysis.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Good list. All true but most also apply to right leaning people. Everyone is ignorant and in denial.
What’s with the left these days wanting war? I remember when the right were hawks and the left were doves. Now everyone wants war as long as someone else does the fighting.
One week of American or British or Belgian kids dying at the same rate that Russians and Ukrainians are dying and everyone would change their tune.
LikeLiked by 2 people
We have to distinguish between types of left and types of right. Mainstream left leaders seem more like central globalists than anything. I was very much focussed on the idealistic sorts that inhabit the doomersphere.
I should right a list for “faux intellectual righties” too – the ones that call out bright green lies but are so in denial about where our civilization is heading:
– Overpopulation is a myth perpetuated by globalists who want to control us.
– There’s no such thing as resource shortages.
– More oil production is essential to lift the world out of poverty (quarter true; lifted out of poverty but planet unlivable ha!)
– Bureaucracy is the cause of all our problems (not actual physical resources of course).
– Tar sands mean we can continue our current way of life for hundreds of years.
– If you want degrowth you must hate humans.
– Climate change is happening so slowly it’s not a major concern. Hey it might actually be helpful because we can mine Antarctica and the world is getting greener dontcha know!
– Social progressives are the biggest threat to our civilization.
– People who complain about colonisation are a bunch of cry baby losers who should be grateful for all the benefits of civilisation.
– Human ingenuity is so great there’s no point even talking about problems – we can solve it all!
LikeLiked by 2 people
*Write a list – LMAO I can spell I promise
LikeLike
They of course won’t mind if Polak kids are sent die. We’re the low man on the pecking order, just behind Rooskies and Ukes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree with many of your points. Here are things I will add.
-Cow farts aren’t really the problem. The real problem with cows is the clearing of rainforests and other wild habitats to feed cattle. 96% of mammalian biomass is humans and livestock and only 4% is wild.
-Population will go down in the future whether we like it or not. If we take steps to address overpopulation now, we might be able to soften the landing.
-We use energy and pretty profligate ways, especially in the U.S., Canada and Australia.
-Expanding on the above, in the U.S. and Canada we built nearly all post-WWII neighborhoods around the automobile.
-The overdeveloped countries will increasingly become like developing countries.
-Indigenous peoples did make mistakes but there is a lot that modern societies can learn from them.
-If large numbers of urbanites suddenly tried to live off the land, it would go disastrously.
-If you are energy blind and deny overpopulation it is easy to see how you could (falsely) conclude that you can lift people out of poverty while decreasing energy use.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hey thanks for replying. I totally agree with you. Couple of things I would add:
I wish They would talk about the real issues that they really mean with farming – obfuscating everything under the climate change rubric isn’t helpful IMO. For example, in NZ we could ban importing meat from South America (where deforestation is happening) and eat our own meat (where we already deforested 100 years ago and are now growing forests). We could also talk about how cropping is unsustainable.
Standard of living and self-reported levels of happiness are strongly co-related with energy burned per capita. Doesn’t bode well for the future; I agree we are heading to developed status.
LikeLike
Sorry about that. WordPress spammed it. I restored it above as soon as I got home.
LikeLiked by 1 person
all good 🙂
LikeLike
I lost some respect for one of my favorite Youtube channels when they posted an overpopulation denial video. Instead of actually talking about climate change being a symptom of overshoot, they just repeated the usual left-wing overpopulation denial.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Climate change, at least the human caused variety is a symptom of not living sustainably. I guess unsustainable living is, by definition, overshoot and so human caused climate change is a symptom of overshoot but it’s more a symptom of unsustainable behaviour.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Frankly, I am not sure I understand the question asked in the poll: “Who or what carries most of the blame for our predicament?”
Is he asking who or what should be removed/stopped in order to fix things? Is this the old us/them finger-pointing reaction? (blame is a strong word, isn’t it?) Is this a sign of the times coming soon (violence against establishment)?
Isn’t overshoot a description of our predicament rather than a cause?
Is the human species really failed? Doesn’t it just behave like any other species? Doesn’t this result from the nature of reality (described by MPP or some other physical law)?
He could have added an option reading something like “that’s how things are”/”nature of reality”/”God” to the poll.
Aren’t we all playing some kind of complex game theory, where we tend to always ascribe problems to others while not questioning or modifying our own behaviour?
And “Doer is a mere fiction added to the deed.”
Sorry, I am lost as soon as a discussion bumps into the “why”. My mind goes like this:
LikeLike
Thanks, one of the most impressive brains that has ever existed.
LikeLike
A lot of the degrowth, overshoot aware, climate change aware, environmental, and doomer space is populated with what I call “idealistic idiotic lefties”. There is absolutely nothing wrong with left-wing values (I would consider myself leftwing). However, what is unhelpful is when these people actually believe there could be a perfect utopia (worker’s paradise, no racism, no sexism, return to indigenous etc). Or they believe that there used to a be a utopia until those bad people did X. I’m feeling a bit inspired by JMG and would like to speculate that this is a Christian narrative, just with different characters. A perfect world awaits the good people, they just have to cast of the devil first.
How this plays out in real life is things like:
– Focusing on cow farts rather than Portland cement, private jets, electricity production, and yachts.
– Saying how evil fossil fuel companies are while driving a car and wearing plastic clothes etc.
– Saying that overpopulation discussions are racist.
– Blaming companies for everything while using said companies’ products and services to stay alive.
– Has a university degree and higher than average income yet complains about being in an oppressed class.
– Idealises indigenous people and disregards historical evidence about indigenous peoples that doesn’t fit the narrative.
– Loves nonsense like net zero, tailpipe emissions, and hydrogen.
– Tells you Jevon’s Paradox is a myth.
– Vegan nonsense like wool is bad, but toxic ponds from synthetic fabric production in China are fine somehow.
– Idealises the past with little real-world experience of farming / living off the land. It is so much harder than it seems, especially if you grew up in suburbia.
– Refuses to accept it is a predicament.
– Refuses to accept the solutions to climate change mean no more civilization.
– Refuses to accept that recession is the only thing that is proven to reduce global emissions.
– Refuses to accept that as far as emissions and the environment go, there is no (or very little) difference between a socialist, fascist, or capitalist country.
LikeLiked by 3 people
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLike
The Amish probably have much lower rates of the “diseases of civilization” (i.e. obesity, diabetes, heart disease, cancer, etc.) than the general population.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes and more sunshine generated vitamin D.
LikeLiked by 2 people
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-023-01157-x
Earlier collapse of Anthropocene ecosystems driven by multiple faster and noisier drivers
For many observers, UK Chief Scientist John Beddington’s argument that the world faced a ‘perfect storm’ of global events by 2030 has now become a prescient warning. Recent mention of ‘ghastly futures’, ‘widespread ecosystem collapse’ and ‘domino effects on sustainability goals’ tap into a growing consensus within some scientific communities that the Earth is rapidly destabilizing through ‘cascades of collapse’. Some even speculate on ‘end-of-world’ scenarios involving transgressing planetary boundaries (climate, freshwater and ocean acidification), accelerating reinforcing (positive) feedback mechanisms and multiplicative stresses. Prudent risk management clearly requires consideration of the factors that may lead to these bad-to-worst-case scenarios. Put simply, the choices we make about ecosystems and landscape management can accelerate change unexpectedly.
Extract:
The Easter Island model aims to explore alternative hypotheses behind the collapse of the Easter Island civilization36. The initial parameterization of the model here is the same as the ‘ecocide’ configuration detailed in ref. 36. The main internal social-ecological feedback driving model dynamics is the balancing feedback between human population growth, tree coverage and land clearance, whereby the overharvesting of the primary resource (palm forest) can lead to overshoot dynamics and the eventual demise of the human population (ecocide).
LikeLiked by 1 person
by Art Berman
LikeLiked by 2 people
I usually think of Kevin Anderson as a scientist who is real about the challenges faced from the climate crisis and doesn’t shirk from calling out the inadequacies of the response so far. However, I just read an article by him about what needs to be done and even he seems to think there is some wonderful world awaiting us if only we took it seriously.
I can barely believe it.
OK, perhaps people will be taken in by a nice hopeful story and start to do “the right thing.” But what will happen when they realise that there is no sublime society waiting for them at the end of that journey?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Kevin Anderson is one of very few climate scientists I respect because he tries to set a good example in his personal life.
I stopped reading the paper when I saw he was arguing we still have a chance to not exceed 1.5C. We’re at 1C today and it’s clearly not safe. How can 1.5C be a useful target?
LikeLiked by 1 person
“I disagree with your point that denial has no role in this process.”
Well, not sure how denial of a fact ever changed a fact. Assuming that the MPP has some factual basis, then humans will arrange themselves accordingly, as circumstance (Law of the Minimum and such) might dictate. The proof will be in the pudding, so to speak.
Of course, their delusions and such will continue for as long as there are humans. Whatever system works will be declared to be the God given best and such. People will continue to try to bargain (deny) their way out of death. But, so what? Changes nothing, I guess.
LikeLike
I’m not sure I understand your argument.
This blog is about trying to understand the reason we are unable to use our uniquely powerful intelligence to acknowledge and act on human overshoot.
If it’s not an evolved tendency to deny unpleasant realities (that enabled our unique intelligence to emerge) as proposed by Dr. Ajit Varki, then what is it?
LikeLike
“If it’s not an evolved tendency to deny unpleasant realities (that enabled our unique intelligence to emerge) as proposed by Dr. Ajit Varki, then what is it?”
I think it’s pretty easy to understand. Our evolved tendencies to deny unpleasant realities (like death, for instance.) is one of the things that allow us, impel us, demand, that we do what we do. We must go into overshoot, until we can’t. That is what our “intelligence”, so to speak, is for.
We must break chemical bonds, to release bound energy, as fast as we can. The only real difference between humans and RNA is that we go out into the enviroment and gather substrate. Celluar RNA is confined to bilological cells. We are not.
Our intelligence [sic] may be unique, among other animals, in that we can “envision” outcomes, but it behaves the same as predicted Darwin, Roddier, “James”, et al.
LikeLike
Thanks. I think we agree on what’s going on.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wildfires in Canada are affecting air quality in the U.S.
Heatwave bringing dangerous conditions to Texas and Mexico.
LikeLike
Better hurry up and buy more EVs.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very good discussion on Ukraine by minds I respect.
LikeLike
To answer the panelists question about who is/will be in charge in Washington I suggest watching Tucker Carlson’s latest diatribe on Twitter. Even though I disagree with Carlson on some issues I love his finely tuned sense of irony, ability to call out hypocrisy and perception of stupidity of those in power in the U.S.
No one’s in charge in the White House except Obama and some small part of Biden’s family.
AJ
LikeLike
2021 interview with RFK Jr. just released by Bret Weinstein.
LikeLike
Must listen. Too much important stuff for me to summarize. Most interesting thing for me was RFK Jr. disclosed that after investigating vaccine harms for 10 years he stumbled on evidence that suggests there is a high probability that his voice impairment was caused by a flu vaccine shot he received.
LikeLike
RFK Jr. also explains one of the biggest and most distressing mysteries about covid.
Why was it a priority to vaccinate children who had zero risk from the disease, with a vaccine that did not prevent them from spreading it to old and vulnerable people, despite harmful side effects to the child including permanent heart damage?
RFK Jr. said it is because a vaccine given to children automatically makes the vaccine manufacturer immune from claims of harms in all age groups.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Nice overview of nuclear energy in France and Germany and the challenges of maintaining the aging fleet.
LikeLike
Good one from Gail Tverberg today.
Something indeed is very strange about covid. Assuming health care was the top priority, we did the exact opposite of what we should have done on every issue. Most interesting to me, despite a mountain of damning evidence, none of our leaders care. They’re clearing thinking about something else.
LikeLiked by 2 people
https://www.rintrah.nl/xbb-1-the-variant-family-that-has-learned-how-to-use-vaccine-imprinting-to-its-own-advantage/
LikeLiked by 2 people
This video about the 6th mass extinction refuses to talk about overpopulation or ecological overshoot.
LikeLike
Thanks, I haven’t watched it yet but a consistent pattern of denial is to discuss everything except what matters.
LikeLike
Today’s interview by Kunstler of Michael Dowd is decent. Nothing new for this crowd but it’s the first time I think I might understand what Dowd’s all about.
Charles, I’ve got a feeling Dowd’s message will resonate with you.
https://kunstler.com/podcast/kunstlercast-380-post-doom-with-eco-theologian-michael-dowd/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes.
Ancient myths and religious texts can be read as the recounting of past hardships. They may thus provide ways to cope with reality (which may be one interpretation of God), describing as much the inner reality as the outer one. They can also be sources of inspiration: they show potential paths outside of contemporary reality, the artificial and transient reality which is collectively built by the current “narrative”. Or they can also function as heads-up: the testament is replete with so many doomers (prophets) and falls. In a way, they are maybe a first tentative to capitalize human experience.
On the more individual and mystic level, they (to my eyes more fundamentally) urge us to reconnect with Truth (another word for reality/God). So they are maybe supposed to be a way out of any form of denial (and more crucially the denial of our “naked” present experience, all that truly is).
(Small aside, given the time I spend playing with mental constructs/fantasies in my mind, I am probably lost in the most extreme form of denial: the denial of now. It’s an addiction difficult to let go of)
But they can equally blur your mind: all interpretation being done by the reader. These texts also emerged from intense battlefields and are subject to power plays (as much as wikipedia).
LikeLike
Starting tomorrow I will be offline for most of a week. Going camping. Feel free to marvel at Varki’s theory in my absence.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Have a lovely time Rob. Thank you for making this little spot of sanity available to us
LikeLiked by 1 person
Have a good trip
LikeLike
A fluffy, irritating, frightening, interesting video on bioweapons that probably explains why Fauci is the highest paid US government employee, despite the mountain of evidence compiled by RFK Jr. that says he should be in jail, and despite the fact that Fauci caused covid.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Kunstler nailed it today. The growing divide is not between left and right. It is between pro-Blob and anti-Blob. The pro-Blob wants to believe what they are told to believe by the mainstream media and no amount of data or evidence will change their mind.
I think about this a lot post-covid.
Given that the force is strong enough for people to harm their own children with a novel vaccine technology, it’s no doubt strong enough to cause a nuclear war.
https://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/blobocracy/
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yeah, I have many similar experiences with the people I’m surrounded by. Many still think that Covid originated in a “wet market”, that Trump is/was a Russian Agent, that Putin is EVIL, all white people, except maybe those within their immediate circle, are evil racists, etc, etc…
Very disheartening. People wonder why I mostly just keep to myself.
The whole “money thing” is kind of a bugga-boo for me. If my money isn’t worth anything, and “they” seem to be working on that, then I’m dead. I guess. Not that I have real problem with dieing, per se. I guess that I have a problem the whole pretend game that is being played around me. Eh, I think that everbody has no choice but to keep hoping and pretending. I guess.
https://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/blobocracy/
LikeLiked by 3 people
Hello there Dave and friends,
I so hear you and join you in the hopium war that continually brews within me. It’s like we’re living in two different realities just to survive with the last bit of sanity we have to keep going. Our family is still immersed in the workaday world of pretending there’s going to be a retirement fund awaiting to keep us comfortable through our old age where we can enjoy all the modcons we are used to, etc, but at the same time we know that isn’t going to happen so we’re using all remaining energy and resources to create a life where we may be able to segue out of that, namely making a homestead where we can be more sufficient in some basic needs, especially growing food and fuel. But that takes umpteen resources and money so we have to keep the day job going, pretending that it won’t change for some time, and that of course means interacting with the rest of the society or even family and friends who are completely blind to our predicament, which takes energy and can be so frustrating and disheartening (as well as irritating!).
This is my “safe” space where I can find others who generally share the same perspective of our human and planetary condition and I can voice my opinions freely being true to myself. What an incredible lifeline this has been and no words (not even my usual verbosity) can come close to expressing my gratitude for this. I hope your ears are burning a bit wherever you are now, Rob, (and hopefully not from sunburn!) because we are all thanking you for making this happen!
All the best to everyone, and for those in the States, may the 4th be with you, however you choose to take meaning from gaining independence!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hey there Rob, by now I hope you’re out the door on your digital detox and reinvigorating yourself immersed in nature. I am sure I speak for all of us here wishing and knowing that you will have a fabulous time doing and being where you love best. In addition, I wish for you peace and tranquillity and a renewed sense of the magnificence of just being alive. In the depths of the forest, under the night stars, you may even be able to leave all other thoughts about overshoot and collapse to your blog where we will continue to keep them simmering in your absence.
We look forward to seeing some photos!
All the best and thank you.
LikeLiked by 3 people
First the periphery, then the center.
https://nation.africa/kenya/business/kenya-breaches-sh10trn-debt-ceiling-4290990
h/t Panopticon
LikeLiked by 2 people
Far out the last thing we need to be doing is messing with science education:
“Science teachers are shocked that an advance version of the draft school science curriculum contains no mention of physics, chemistry or biology.
The so-called “fast draft” said science would be taught through four contexts – the Earth system, biodiversity, food, energy and water, and infectious diseases.
It was sent to just a few teachers for their feedback ahead of its release for consultation next month, but some were so worried by the content they leaked it to their peers.
Teachers who had seen the document told RNZ they had grave concerns about it. It was embarrassing, and would lead to “appalling” declines in student achievement, they said.”
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/education/300921067/teachers-shocked-at-leaked-draft-of-science-curriculum–wheres-the-science
LikeLike
Michaux keeps getting attacked by those who wantThe Transition to be possible. Here’s the latest: https://cleantechnica.com/2023/07/04/how-many-things-must-one-analyst-get-wrong-in-order-to-proclaim-a-convenient-decarbonization-minerals-shortage/
It starts out, in the first few screens, by attacking the man, belittling him. That is an instant red flag. But it does point to a video that apparently debunks Michaux’s analysis. It does go into more detail on the report but doesn’t appear to back up assumptions about energy with actual data and calculations.
I don’t know if Michaux has seen the article or the video (by a different person) but it would be nice to get his reaction, if someone know how to contact him about this.
LikeLiked by 2 people
“Michael Barnardis a member of the Advisory Boards of electric aviation startup FLIMAX, Chief Strategist at TFIE Strategy and co-founder of distnc technologies” so totally doesn’t have an agenda (eye roll).
I’d rather listen to an actual scientist than glorified salesman. This fella is no different to those green hydrogen hawks.
And it doesn’t matter if Simon is wrong by a factor of whatever, the point still remains that rare earth minerals are not renewable and very much as finite as fossilized carbons. That puts a time limit on industrial civ, and all the other issues with electrification are still there – such as smelting steel, making silicon wafers, and transporting goods.
And when Michael says, “But he’s not an electricity and energy guy. He’s not a batteries guy. He’s not an EV guy. He’s not a decarbonization guy. He’s not a systems thinking guy. He’s not a grid guy. He’s not a fuels guy. He’s not a transportation guy. He’s not a minerals recycling guy. He’s a mining and minerals expert, within a subset of that field.” … Umm yes that’s the point LOL!
Anyway, Michael’s arguments:
1. We’ll somehow have less energy demand in the future because of heat pumps. Wrong, no proof that efficiency gains reduce energy use or demand.
2. Disagreement about how many batteries would be required in a “renewable” energy system. Better to be conservative on this just in case, especially since batteries don’t last very long.
3. Michael believes in other energy storage solutions (like pumped hydro) that have been shown to be negative energy return, more grid storage (don’t you need more minerals to build more grid storage though?), and new cooler batteries (innovation will solve resource shortages!).
5. Michael sells products and services for electricity storage. He claims his solutions are fab.
6. Ignores physics and says batteries can power trucking and shipping.
7. He’s done the work you guys! What has non-superstar Michaux ever done!?
8. Michaux should have accounted for aluminium being used as a conductor as well as copper. No mention of what the quantifiable effect of this is, just a pithy example of something from the EV industry. He disagrees on concerns about copper. I mean you could just take known reserves of copper and compare them to annual consumption instead of freaking guessing how people will use copper in the future….
9. Recycling myths from Michael. Michael also ignores energy and carbon costs of recycling.
10. “[Michaux] is telling a story a lot of people want to hear, and so is being amplified by the usual suspects.” Really?! Seems like no one wants to hear it
11. “Someone defending his analysis on a LinkedIn thread yesterday said he [Michaux] was submitting his paper for peer review, which is always a bit of a crap shoot. It’s possible he’ll get it accepted. It won’t be in Nature Energy, that’s for sure.” Just recording this here for posterity.
LikeLiked by 4 people
The ad hominem attacks were about 40% of the article. One thing that Michaux didn’t take into account is that electric motors are more energy efficient than combustion engines.
But energy skeptic has a few articles on this:
https://energyskeptic.com/2021/diesel-finite-where-are-electric-trucks/
https://energyskeptic.com/2016/who-killed-the-electric-car/
https://energyskeptic.com/2022/why-how-mining-metals-for-renewables-will-destroy-the-planet-not-prevent-the-energy-crisis/
https://energyskeptic.com/2015/all-of-california-electricity-per-year-to-power-16000-catenary-trucks-on-2400-to-8275-miles-of-highway/
Alice Friedeman is the technofix slayer
LikeLiked by 2 people
Gosh, monk, they are excellent points. Thanks for this!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I could have been really mean and said “it was an uninspiring piece of creative writing from a BA English major” oops
LikeLike
I cleared my cookies recently an now all of the usernames in the comments show up as [1].
It also happened with Surplus Energy Economic which is also a wordpress site.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh no! Another sign of the collapse of complexity
LikeLike
I know the feeling! WordPress will not let me do “Like” anymore and it makes me jump through hoops just to put “AJ” on comments. (I probably have something set on Firefox incorrectly?).
AJ
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, No! It’s doing the dreaded [1] to me too.
AJ
LikeLiked by 1 person
It could be Firefox. Just trying another browser with this comment, to see. Alternatively, I sometimes use WordPress reader, which I’d probably use exclusively except that notifications of comments link me here. I just looked at Reader and it has the right user names. Anyway, here goes a comment using the Brave browser.
LikeLike
Well, it posted cleanly but shows [1] for the user name, and “like” didn’t work. So, back to Reader.
LikeLiked by 1 person