RFK Jr. Confirmation

RFK Jr. was confirmed yesterday as HHS Secretary and the MAHA Alliance held a press conference to celebrate this important moment in history.

Del Bigtree was RFK Jr.’s Communications Director. Now that RFK Jr. has been confirmed, Bigtree’s job is finished and he’s able to speak for himself without representing RFK Jr.

Sen. Ron Johnson introduces Del Bigtree at 10:20.

Bigtree’s speech starts at 16:00 and is a must watch for anyone concerned about improving our collective health, and righting the wrongs of covid.

If any of you, like me, feel the need for a little revenge after covid, this speech is righteous.

Bigtree brutally destroys the mainstream news media for their incompetence, indifference, and corruption.

This speech by RFK Jr. after his swearing in ceremony is also excellent.

I don’t have too many heroes, but RFK Jr. is one of them. This video is a nice introduction to the man.

Here is the president’s executive order authorizing MAHA. It’s inspiring and worth a read.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/02/establishing-the-presidents-make-america-healthy-again-commission/

ESTABLISHING THE PRESIDENT’S
MAKE AMERICA HEALTHY AGAIN COMMISSION

EXECUTIVE ORDER

February 13, 2025

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:

Section 1.  Purpose.  American life expectancy significantly lags behind other developed countries, with pre‑COVID-19 United States life expectancy averaging 78.8 years and comparable countries averaging 82.6 years.  This equates to 1.25 billion fewer life years for the United States population.  Six in 10 Americans have at least one chronic disease, and four in 10 have two or more chronic diseases.  An estimated one in five United States adults lives with a mental illness.

These realities become even more painful when contrasted with nations around the globe.  Across 204 countries and territories, the United States had the highest age-standardized incidence rate of cancer in 2021, nearly double the next-highest rate.  Further, from 1990-2021, the United States experienced an 88 percent increase in cancer, the largest percentage increase of any country evaluated.  In 2021, asthma was more than twice as common in the United States than most of Europe, Asia, or Africa.  Autism spectrum disorders had the highest prevalence in high-income countries, including the United States, in 2021.  Similarly, autoimmune diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease, psoriasis, and multiple sclerosis are more commonly diagnosed in high-income areas such as Europe and North America.  Overall, the global comparison data demonstrates that the health of Americans is on an alarming trajectory that requires immediate action.

This concern applies urgently to America’s children.  In 2022, an estimated 30 million children (40.7 percent) had at least one health condition, such as allergies, asthma, or an autoimmune disease.  Autism spectrum disorder now affects 1 in 36 children in the United States — a staggering increase from rates of 1 to 4 out of 10,000 children identified with the condition during the 1980s.  Eighteen percent of late adolescents and young adults have fatty liver disease, close to 30 percent of adolescents are prediabetic, and more than 40 percent of adolescents are overweight or obese.

These health burdens have continued to increase alongside the increased prescription of medication.  For example, in the case of Attention Deficit Disorder/Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, over 3.4 million children are now on medication for the disorder — up from 3.2 million children in 2019-2020 — and the number of children being diagnosed with the condition continues to rise.  

This poses a dire threat to the American people and our way of life.  Seventy-seven percent of young adults do not qualify for the military based in large part on their health scores.  Ninety percent of the Nation’s $4.5 trillion in annual healthcare expenditures is for people with chronic and mental health conditions.  In short, Americans of all ages are becoming sicker, beset by illnesses that our medical system is not addressing effectively.  These trends harm us, our economy, and our security.

To fully address the growing health crisis in America, we must re-direct our national focus, in the public and private sectors, toward understanding and drastically lowering chronic disease rates and ending childhood chronic disease.  This includes fresh thinking on nutrition, physical activity, healthy lifestyles, over-reliance on medication and treatments, the effects of new technological habits, environmental impacts, and food and drug quality and safety.  We must restore the integrity of the scientific process by protecting expert recommendations from inappropriate influence and increasing transparency regarding existing data.  We must ensure our healthcare system promotes health rather than just managing disease.

Sec. 2.  Policy.  It shall be the policy of the Federal Government to aggressively combat the critical health challenges facing our citizens, including the rising rates of mental health disorders, obesity, diabetes, and other chronic diseases.  To do so, executive departments and agencies (agencies) that address health or healthcare must focus on reversing chronic disease.  Under this policy:

(a)  all federally funded health research should empower Americans through transparency and open-source data, and should avoid or eliminate conflicts of interest that skew outcomes and perpetuate distrust;

(b)  the National Institutes of Health and other health-related research funded by the Federal Government should prioritize gold-standard research on the root causes of why Americans are getting sick;

(c)  agencies shall work with farmers to ensure that United States food is the healthiest, most abundant, and most affordable in the world; and

(d)  agencies shall ensure the availability of expanded treatment options and the flexibility for health insurance coverage to provide benefits that support beneficial lifestyle changes and disease prevention.

Sec. 3.  Establishment and Composition of the President’s Make America Healthy Again Commission.  (a)  There is hereby established the President’s Make America Healthy Again Commission (Commission), chaired by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (Chair), with the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy serving as Executive Director (Executive Director).

(b)  In addition to the Chair and the Executive Director, the Commission shall include the following officials, or their designees:

(i)     the Secretary of Agriculture;

(ii)    the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development;

(iii)   the Secretary of Education;

(iv)    the Secretary of Veterans Affairs;

(v)     the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency;

(vi)    the Director of the Office of Management and Budget;

(vii)   the Assistant to the President and Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy;

(viii)  the Director of the National Economic Council;

(ix)    the Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers;

(x)     the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy;

(xi)    the Commissioner of Food and Drugs;

(xii)   the Director for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;

(xiii)  the Director of the National Institutes of Health; and

(xiv)   other members of my Administration invited to participate, at the discretion of the Chair and the Executive Director.

Sec. 4.  Fighting Childhood Chronic Disease.  The initial mission of the Commission shall be to advise and assist the President on how best to exercise his authority to address the childhood chronic disease crisis.  Therefore, the Commission shall:

(a)  study the scope of the childhood chronic disease crisis and any potential contributing causes, including the American diet, absorption of toxic material, medical treatments, lifestyle, environmental factors, Government policies, food production techniques, electromagnetic radiation, and corporate influence or cronyism;  

(b)  advise and assist the President on informing the American people regarding the childhood chronic disease crisis, using transparent and clear facts; and

(c)  provide to the President Government-wide recommendations on policy and strategy related to addressing the identified contributing causes of and ending the childhood chronic disease crisis.

Sec. 5.  Initial Assessment and Strategy from the Make America Healthy Again Commission.  (a)  Make our Children Healthy Again Assessment.  Within 100 days of the date of this order, the Commission shall submit to the President, through the Chair and the Executive Director, the Make Our Children Healthy Again Assessment, which shall:

(i)     identify and describe childhood chronic disease in America compared to other countries;

(ii)    assess the threat that potential over-utilization of medication, certain food ingredients, certain chemicals, and certain other exposures pose to children with respect to chronic inflammation or other established mechanisms of disease, using rigorous and transparent data, including international comparisons;

(iii)   assess the prevalence of and threat posed by the prescription of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, stimulants, and weight-loss drugs;

(iv)    identify and report on best practices for preventing childhood health issues, including through proper nutrition and the promotion of healthy lifestyles;

(v)     evaluate the effectiveness of existing educational programs with regard to nutrition, physical activity, and mental health for children;

(vi)    identify and evaluate existing Federal programs and funding intended to prevent and treat childhood health issues for their scope and effectiveness;

(vii)   ensure transparency of all current data and unpublished analyses related to the childhood chronic disease crisis, consistent with applicable law;

(viii)  evaluate the effectiveness of current Federal Government childhood health data and metrics, including those from the Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics and the National Survey of Children’s Health;

(ix)    restore the integrity of science, including by eliminating undue industry influence, releasing findings and underlying data to the maximum extent permitted under applicable law, and increasing methodological rigor; and

(x)     establish a framework for transparency and ethics review in industry-funded projects.

(b)  Make our Children Healthy Again Strategy.  Within 180 days of the date of this order, the Commission shall submit to the President, through the Chair and the Executive Director, a Make Our Children Healthy Again Strategy (Strategy), based on the findings from the Make Our Children Healthy Again Assessment described in subsection (a) of this section.  The Strategy shall address appropriately restructuring the Federal Government’s response to the childhood chronic disease crisis, including by ending Federal practices that exacerbate the health crisis or unsuccessfully attempt to address it, and by adding powerful new solutions that will end childhood chronic disease.

(c)  The Chair may hold public hearings, meetings, roundtables, and similar events, as appropriate, and may receive expert input from leaders in public health and Government accountability. 

Sec. 6.  Additional Reports.  (a)  Following the submission to the President of the Strategy, and any final strategy reports thereafter, the Chair and the Executive Director shall recommend to the President updates to the Commission’s mission, including desired reports.

(b)  The Commission shall not reconvene, following submission of the Strategy, until an updated mission is submitted to the President through the Executive Director.

Sec. 7.  General Provisions.  (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i)   the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

THE WHITE HOUSE,

    February 13, 2025.

<edit>

A few comments below from angry, now ex, followers suggest they were unaware of my gradual transformation over the last 4 years of observing and researching covid, from being certain RFK Jr. was a nut job, to now supporting RFK Jr.’s mission to improve our abysmal and worsening pubic health.

I’ve copied my replies to the criticisms here so that the reasons for my new beliefs are clear.

notabilia: You make excellent, well-researched points at times.
And you throw it all away by being an anti-vaxxer ass clown. 

I too thought anti-vaxxers were nut jobs.

Then the experts I trusted renamed a 20 year old technology, known to be unsafe and ineffective in humans, from transfection to vaccine, pretended transfection was a new miracle technology, and coerced it into 5+ billion people after insufficient and fraudulent testing, including children that had zero risk from the virus, and when adverse event data showed the transfections were dangerous at levels far higher than had been sufficient to withdraw prior vaccines from the market, they doubled down, and hid and denied the data, and they continued to coerce transfections despite the disease being low risk for all except elderly and co-morbid people, and despite several safe and effective alternate treatments being available.

Today the rate of sickness and all-cause mortality is higher than pre-transfection, and the only thing our “experts” are certain of is that the cause is not the mRNA transfections. This despite there being several easy to understand first principle reasons to suspect mRNA transfections will never, and can never, be made safe.

The mRNA transfections are just the tip of the covid iceberg. They lied about every single covid issue, and they used tax dollars to corrupt news media, and to censor social media, to make us believe the lies.

Every covid policy was exactly wrong. To maximize your probability of good health the best course of action was to do exactly the opposite of what they told us to do. Incompetence does not explain this. They would have achieved a better public health outcome had they flipped a coin on every decision.

After observing 4 years of a healthcare system incapable of learning and correcting when new data emerges, and that pathologically lies, I no longer trust a word they say about anything.

So yes, I now proudly call myself an anti-vaxxer.

Go get ’em Bobby!

Anonymous: The health problems of the US population can largely be traced to a crap diet… good luck changing that. Any real attempt to do so will be shut down as a communist plot.

Yes, unhealthy food is a huge problem. It’s also not that complicated. Reducing sugar would be a good start.

We face many existential overshoot threats for which there is no “fix” thanks to MPP and MORT governing our behaviors, and thanks to the core design of the system that keeps us alive.

The threat from relatively recent, extremely poor public health is different. There is nothing fundamental blocking us from improving public health. I think we should support RFK Jr. and try.

A healthy population will be a strong asset, perhaps our only asset, when the everything bubble pops and modern civilization collapses.

<edit>

Secretary Kennedy delivers welcoming remarks to HHS staff.

Godspeed RFK Jr.

1,252 thoughts on “RFK Jr. Confirmation”

  1. Just in case you do not believe any of the common covid stories, John Cullen is pushing a different theory that that the covid transfections were actually intended to protect against H7N9 bird flu.

    I don’t currently trust Cullen because he is a click chaser, but he does raise a few interesting questions.

    If anyone has seen a good debunking of Cullen, please post it.

    Like

  2. Chris Martenson takes his gloves off on the covid crimes.

    What if everything Chris said is true, except that it was a bioweapons threat response driven by the US military panicking about a leak from the Wuhan research it funded, and ordering pharma to do the evils it did?

    COMMON KNOWLEDGE ALERT (When everybody knows that *everybody knows*)

    The vaccines are unsafe. This is now coming out in a flood of awareness that cannot be stopped. Soon it will be Common Knowledge that the mRNA experimental products harmed people. Everybody will know that everybody knows the same thing; the vaccines were behind the rash of sudden deaths and Aunt Sally’s sudden decline.

    But wait until they realize the second part; that they were *deliberately* harmed. Pharma knew their products were unsafe and they hid that from the public.

    The CDC knew the jabs were unsafe as well because they refused to collect base data that would show the harm and when the CDC accidentally received that data they then did what they could to suppress those results from public view. The CDC then went on to recommend the jabs to 12-year-olds and eventually all the way down to 6-month-olds.

    The FDA also knew the jabs were dangerous and conspired to hide that information from the public. They tried to hide the Pfizer documents for 75 years. They failed to warn about the presence of DNA fragments and even whole plasmids with SV40 promoter regions that could cause genetic damage and cancers in a proportion of the human victims of the mRNA experiments.

    But even that doesn’t get to the depths of the darkness.

    The final revelation which many people will not be able to psychologically handle is that the spike protein itself was engineered to be toxic.

    The gull-length spike protein has 4 regions from the HIV (AIDS virus) gp120 protein which may account for its devastating immune system destruction. It has amyloid regions that are the probable trigger for the immense clotting issues that have been medically plaguing people (brain fog, strokes, etc), especially including the ‘calamari clots’ seen post-mortem.

    It has several keys to enter various types of cells besides the ACE2 keyhole, when a normal virus usually only has a single key to a single cellular lock. Where and how did Covid get all these keys to the human cellular kingdom?

    In a lab, which the NIAID and Welcome Trust and the Mean Girls virology club conspired to hide from everyone.

    So why did Pfizer and Moderna both “independently” choose to use that full-length, engineered-to-be-toxic, protein in their jab formula?

    Normally a vaccine uses the smallest antigenic sequences possible to train the immune system to respond. Because an antibody protein can only cover ~6 amino acids of topography (think how much of an elephant’s body your hand could cover at any one time) it wouldn’t make sense to design a vaccine around a string of amino acids that is hundreds of units long.

    But every single pharma company, “independently” all decided to build their products around the full-length spike protein measuring a whopping 1273 amino acids. Not 6, or 40 or even 100, but all 1273.

    Why?

    It makes no sense from a manufacturing standpoint; longer is harder. It makes no sense from a medical standpoint because you’re training the body to make a whole bunch of ‘non-sterilizing’ antibodies along with the ones that block viral entry into cells.

    But it does make sense from the standpoint of injecting people with a toxic substance that would cause long-term issues such as heart damage, immune dysregulation, neurological damage, and infertility.

    You see, each one of those conditions has a downstream product to sell into. If that sounds too dark, the next six months are going to be brutal for you in terms of revelations.

    The people who did this are the same people who hid the fact that their products caused SIDS and autism. Do you really think people who would knowingly kill babies in their cribs would hesitate even slightly to produce a jab that would harm an adult? I don’t.

    To say I am infuriated is an understatement. We must hold the people who did this accountable. It cannot be overlooked and swept under the rug.

    P.S. Did “kill babies in their cribs” sound hyperbolic? I suppose it does, but that’s a factual statement (from Miller & Goldman, 2011, a study across 30 countries, more vaccines = more dead babies):

    Image

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Good discussion on the problems with mRNA transfections.

      They also announce a new independent medical journal free of pharma influence that sounds very promising.

      Like

      1. Very nice to see other people starting to echo one of Dr. J.J. Couey’s core messages that “intramuscular injection of any combination of substances intended to enhance the immune system is DUMB” on first principles.

        Like

      2. Loved this discussion. Very ethical docs who explain the persistence of the Covid antigen in the body as referenced in the Yale study above. And a good explanation of the whole seriously flawed mRNA transfection approach (except from a Pharma/Medical System making money approach). If RFK Jr. does anything it should be to ban mRNA “shots” or at least take away the EUA for them and bring back liability for all “vaccines”.

        AJ

        Liked by 1 person

  3. Kash Patel was confirmed today.

    I’ve been clicking the refresh button every 10 minutes to see confirmation that Bill Gates is on the Epstein list so we can destroy the balance of Gate’s life as payback for his covid crimes.

    No sign of the list yet but a lot of people are ready pounce.

    Like

  4. How Elite Surplus and Inequality Lead to Societal Upheaval with Peter Turchin | TGS 164

    To be honest, I disagree with him about Trump. I believe that Trump poses a grave danger to what remains of American democracy. As an alternative, I think America needs someone more like FDR. Surface level reforms won’t cut it. We need deep systemic change to address what led to the rise of Trump in the first place.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. This was a most enlightening conversation. Too bad Turchin is a techno-optimist and overshoot unaware because then he would see that there is truly no hope for our PREDICAMENTS.

      However, that said he is brilliant in diagnosing where societies go wrong in that over time they overproduce elites and immiserate the other 90% of the population. He gets it with regard to this having occurred in the U.S. since the 1980’s when real wages stagnated for the lower classes while the ranks of the 1% oligarchs increased.

      How to “save” the U.S. requires a more equal sharing of wealth and avoid violent rebellion. He also sees the future as very contingent on decisions that some of the elite do (such as Trump), “the most important thing a dictator can do is appoint the right people”; hence maybe Musk and RFK Jr. can make positive change. He also said that “all good comes from collective action”. Dems at the moment are pushing violence and that would be counter productive. It would be better if both sides tried to make the system more equitable but with declining resources I doubt that’s possible.

      AJ

      Liked by 3 people

    2. I also watched, but have been reticent to put in my 2c worth, as all I took from this discussion was we have another expert in a field, that is so engrossed in their work/findings that they no longer see the forest for the trees.

      Early on he did briefly mention that whole societies were wiped out in the neolithic period because of overpopulation, with the groups blaming each other, lots of blood spilled then revenge until virtually no-one left in the area.

      Any techno-optimist that understands how 4 million humans meant overpopulation in some areas, that doesn’t understand 8,200 million humans is a problem has lost touch. The later hand wave of solar and batteries getting cheaper solving energy, climate, etc, even Nate Hagens took a deep breath and moved on.

      This highlights the problem of complexity as a physical law as real as thermodynamic laws. It’s very, very complex, not simple laws like thermodynamics.

      A complex self adapting system has so many moving parts, that leaving out any major, and possibly even minor aspect can render the entire conclusions as irrelevant. In Turchin’s case his theories of too many elites has probably worked in the last 10,000 years of increasing energy use, material use and complex technology development, in a stable climate with background levels of extinctions.

      However to think the same will work in the period going forward of less energy, less materials, chaotic climate, more extinctions and collapsing technology is puerile at best.

      I’m not saying his research about elites is waste, I’m sure it’s part of the overall big picture, but is not the sole main event, because of everything he leaves out.

      The future will be totally different from the past, because the parameters operating are completely different from the past. It will be a world of less energy, less materials, more chaotic climate, decreasing species diversity, with greater levels of pollution leading to a more toxic environment for life in general.

      The only way to look at the future is from the view of what happens to complex self adapting systems in a similar situation of where their major sources of energy, materials and environment change for the worse. The results are always the same, the system changes drastically, with the largest systems tending to have the fastest collapse, whereas the smallest systems last much longer with their collapse possibly giving time for adaptation to the changed parameters.

      All higher lifeforms are very complex self adapting systems and all have a very fast collapse that we call death. A human body is composed of up to 30-40 trillion cells, with interactions vastly more complicated than our civilizations. We can adapt up to a point with new and different foods, environments etc, but a change too great for the body to overcome, or too little energy intake, and the body collapses in death, which is the rapid breakdown of every part of the highly complex system.

      Liked by 5 people

    3. I’ve started but am struggling to finish this episode.

      Turchin seems to be yet another expert that understands everything except the important bit, and that blindness casts doubt on everything else he says.

      A good argument can be made that we need elites today to keep the game going.

      Our monetary system must growth or else it will collapse, and we’ve hit physical limits to growth, but a way to fake real growth is to concentrate growing paper wealth in the accounts of the elite.

      If we were to redistribute that wealth to the poor, they would spend it, which would cause inflation, which would cause higher interest rates, which would bankrupt governments, which would accelerate collapse.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Our monetary system must growth or else it will collapse, and we’ve hit physical limits to growth, but a way to fake real growth is to concentrate growing paper wealth in the accounts of the elite.

        We have the wolf by the ear, and we can neither hold him nor safely let him go. We will have to let go sooner or later, and when we do, the whole Ponzi scheme will unravel. How would we even begin to transition away from a debt-based money system?

        Liked by 3 people

        1. My guess, all money will lose value fairly rapidly and then life will be about survival. (which doesn’t necessarily mean everybody against everybody: that’s part of the current myths, social darwinism and such)

          Like

  5. Israel drops leaflets threatening Gaza’s population ‘leave or die’
    https://www.newarab.com/news/israel-drops-leaflets-threatening-gazans-leave-or-die

    Israel has sparked global outrage after dropping leaflets over the besieged Gaza Strip, warning Palestinians to either cooperate with its forces or face forced displacement or eradication.

    The messages, written in Arabic, carried explicit threats, including the chilling statement: “The world map will not change if all the people of Gaza cease to exist.”

    The move, condemned as a psychological warfare tactic, has intensified concerns over Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, with many seeing the leaflets as an open admission of ethnic cleansing.

    States committing genocide usually try to conceal their crimes. Israel isn’t even trying to hide its genocide.

    Like

    1. Here is a full translation of the leaflet, apparently twitter/X won’t fully embed posts longer than 280 characters.

      “To the honorable people of Gaza,

      After the events that have taken place, the temporary ceasefire, and before the implementation of Trump’s mandatory plan—which will impose forced displacement upon you whether you accept it or not—we have decided to make one final appeal to those who wish to receive aid in exchange for cooperating with us. We will not hesitate for a moment to provide assistance.

      Reconsider your position. The world map will not change if all the people of Gaza cease to exist. No one will feel for you, and no one will ask about you. You have been left alone to face your inevitable fate. Iran cannot even protect itself, let alone protect you, and you have seen with your own eyes what has happened. Neither America nor Europe care about Gaza in any way. Even your Arab countries, which are now our allies, provide us with money and weapons while sending you only shrouds.

      There is little time left—the game is almost over.

      Whoever wishes to save themselves before it is too late, we are here, remaining until the end of time.”

      Like

      1. I had not heard about this.

        I’d like to think Trump’s bluster about buying Gaza and turning it into a resort was simply a tactic to scare the Arab states into coming up with a good solution, or putting up the money to rebuild Gaza.

        This will be a test of Trump’s character.

        Will Trump permit and enable genocide like Biden did?

        I bet Trump will prevent another genocide. We’ll soon see.

        If Trump permits Israel to resume the genocide my guess is the middle east will explode into a war and Israel will be defeated.

        Liked by 1 person

  6. Andril Zvorygin is a very interesting and impressive young man. He leads the best peak oil group and attracts top intellectuals as guests. He leads a religious group that seems to provide members with some comfort to offset their overshoot awareness. He has (I think) impressive food growing skills. And he’s a software programmer.

    Now it looks like he’s running for mayor with a platform focused on food security and resilience for his community.

    Very nice to see an aware person trying to do something useful for their community.

    Liked by 3 people

  7. This is obviously the root cause of every one of the 17+ million deaths associated with covid.

    Why are our leaders not screaming to put the people responsible in prison?

    Why has nothing been to done to prevent a recurrence?

    WTF is going on? Seriously, WTF?

    A quick reminder:

    A virus appeared in Wuhan that was:
    • highly infectious from the get-go
    • superbly adapted to human ACE-2
    • but bad at infecting bats
    • and whose closest relatives came from where the WIV had been collecting viruses a thousand miles away from Wuhan
    • and uniquely equipped with a furin cleavage site never before seen in Sars-like viruses

    It turned up in a city where there was a lab:
    • with a huge sars-like virus hunting program
    • that had collected hundreds of related viruses from a long way away and brought them to Wuhan
    • that possessed the 9 closest relatives to SARS2 – that we know of – in its own freezer
    • that had recently got interested in SARS1’s more distant cousins
    • that misled us about when it had sequenced the nearest relative and why it had changed the name
    • and that would not share its data base

    Not only that, the lab:
    • had already made chimera viruses
    • with massively increased infectivity in humanized mice
    • was party to a plan to put a furin cleavage site in such a virus for the first time
    • knowing that this generally makes viruses more infectious
    • having already done it in a mers-like virus
    • and when the outbreak happened they were reluctant to draw attention to the furin cleavage site in sars2

    Moreover, that lab had a poor safety record:
    • as testified by a US Embassy 2018 report
    • was in the habit of using inappropriate safety levels for its experiment
    • and behaved very oddly when the outbreak happened.

    None of this is disputed.

    And meanwhile, Wuhan’s seafood market was found to contain:
    – No infected animals
    – No infected animal traders
    – No infected wildlife handlers
    – And no other market was affected.

    So Covid turned up in:
    – exactly the right city
    – at exactly the right time
    – as they were planning exactly the right experiments
    – that would put exactly the right insertion
    – into exactly the right place
    – in exactly the right gene
    – of exactly the right kind of virus.

    And to do so at exactly the wrong biosafety level.

    We are supposed to believe that it’s a coincidence? Because some unidentified raccoon dogs also happened along at the same time and then vanished without trace?

    Like

  8. Just a thought on complexity as I continue to research as many different angles as I can possibly find about the subject, another window opened in my thinking of what gets left out.

    While this is seemingly specifically about human civilizations, I also thought of how it would also apply to large stars, a purely physical complex system.

    In all the work done on human settlement size and complexity from Prof Geoffrey West et al work, and there are hundreds if not thousands of research papers on this, all based on observation, the quick simple explanation is that as human settlements grow, the physical world of these grow at the power of 85% of the population growth, while the human social factors grow at an exponential rate of 115%, the inverse of the physical size. These are the scale or size power laws.

    In nature this has also been observed in a variety of different fields from biology, known as “Kleiber’s law” where the power law tends to be 75%. In biology we don’t understand the increase in brain function of larger brained animals to work out if their are higher forms of complexity in memory, decision making, relationships with others and environment etc, so we don’t know if there is an equivalent to human’s settlements increase in social function by a different power law to the biologic one.

    Back to human settlements… All the research I’ve found on complexity misses a simple function we know happens, Jevon’s paradox. Better technology makes whatever cheaper, which leads to greater use and uses. In our human civilization better steam engines, lead to more use of coal.

    However it’s not that simple, it also leads to wider uses of coal for a variety of different purposes, that enabled other technology to develop as complexity increased. Likewise for oil and gas, initial uses not only grew, but variety of uses also grew, many of which underpinned further development of complex technology upon which modernity became reliant as it grew (think plastics, chemicals, fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, etc).

    Think of civilization as a pyramid, with different underlying layers. At the very bottom is the early use of energy as in food to feed the fledgling civilization, with not many layers above. As the system becomes more complex with growth, the more efficient and different uses of materials and energy, flows both upward and downward in the pyramid, growing all the layers while adding more newer complexity on top. As civilization grows so does the complexity, with the new complexity affecting all levels below, not just it’s own.

    Think of an oil well drill bit, these days it has a range of sensors and other tools for measuring many details of the hole, but without simple plastic as insulators allowing these sensitive electronic components to work, they wouldn’t exist. Of course not ‘ordinary’ plastic, it’s highly specialised plastics and polymers, non of which existed when we were first drilling for oil.

    How does Jevon’s paradox fit in? All the new complexity gets cheaper in a growing system, so allows for use of the new complexity in the varying layers of the pyramid structure, including the lowest levels, as it’s now cheap enough to use for the basics of human civilization. However the feedback loop is that now the lowest levels of functioning at the bottom of the pyramid become reliant upon the greater complexity provided by the growth of complexity within the entire system.

    Super giant stars as a complex system, in the field known as astrophysics, is a highly complex and rapidly evolving area of science. What we think we know, is that the supergiant stars go through a main sequence of burning hydrogen in fusion like all other stars. The mass of these super giants produces greater internal gravity and pressure than smaller mass stars, all formed from a mass of a gas cloud. Because of the higher gravity and pressure in the core, once it has finished fusing hydrogen, the force of the energy from this fusion diminished, and the star begins to collapse in on itself, which increases internal pressure heating up the star further, allowing the combination of increased gravity and heat to start helium fusion.

    To not turn this into a long drawn out astrophysics lesson, what happens is that convection currents from the hot core, go to the surface, with the fusion energy stopping the star from collapsing in on itself, with cooler surface gases and elements falling into the star, which sets up complex interactions of pressure, gravity, fusion of different elements in different layers, interconnecting with each other (hopefully not too many physicists are rolling their eyes in the very simplistic explanation).

    The higher pressure and temperatures in the core and layers near the core are in a constant flux of interactions, with the higher element fusion dependent upon the earlier heat, pressure and gravity. At some point these super massive stars get to fusing iron, that absorbs energy instead releasing energy, so the energy that stopped the star from imploding into itself drops dramatically. It’s this implosion after it’s used it’s energy that causes a supernova by the whole system collapsing upon itself.

    I can see the fusion of higher elements and the distribution throughout the system as a type of Jevon’s paradox, creating more energy for further fusion, keeping the system going, while affecting every aspect of the existing system.

    The largest stars also give off the most energy in luminosity, solar winds and mass ejections, while the internal forces seem to become more efficient. I’m wondering if it’s a trait of highly complex systems to have huge efficiencies and inefficiencies at the same time in different aspects or locations of the system and these external inefficiencies are an inherent facet of complex systems. In other words the larger the complex system the larger the waste heat almost by definition.

    Back to human civilization, again.. Given all the complex interactions affecting every layer of complexity and the currents transferring complexity into every aspect of the modern world, it becomes more obvious to me that at some point when the energy can no longer increase, to drive growth in complexity, the interactions that rely on the higher complexity will cease to function, rapidly negatively affecting even the bottom aspects of the complexity pyramid, because complexity has affected everything, leading to a very rapid implosion of 8 point whatever billion humans in our civilization.

    Our energy cost of energy is the equivalent of stars fusing higher elements until they reach iron, which doesn’t give off energy during fusion, it uses energy in that reaction instead. Perhaps Renewables and Nuclear are civilization’s analogues to this, in using more energy in their mining, manufacture, construction and deployment, while we lie to ourselves about their net energy…

    ……………..

    This was meant to be a short post, but got away from me. It’s still a work in progress, but I’m coming to the conclusion that civilization and every other complex self adapting system all follow basic universal laws of physics we don’t yet fully understand. Yet observation tells us that the largest systems are the fastest to collapse at the end of their lifespan, when they can no longer maintain energy requirements…

    Sorry for the long post, it’s just so highly complex….

    Liked by 4 people

    1. Nice.

      Before I became aware of your work I understood that the design of our monetary system, which provides the abundant credit required by a complex civilization, needs economic growth to function, and without growth our system will collapse.

      Then you introduced us to the idea that mineral and energy depletion requires growth in both complexity and energy (a la red queen), to prevent the system from collapsing.

      Now you’ve introduced us to the idea that depleting mineral qualities eventually outstrip the ability of extra complexity and energy to compensate, and that this is analogous to a star using up it’s fuel and collapsing. I like this idea and think it’s a good analogy.

      At the beginning of your essay you say:

      In biology we don’t understand the increase in brain function of larger brained animals to work out if their are higher forms of complexity in memory, decision making, relationships with others and environment etc, so we don’t know if there is an equivalent to human’s settlements increase in social function by a different power law to the biologic one.

      I think hierarchical abstraction is a good candidate to explain what is going on in both our brain and human settlements.

      One key feature (besides denial) that distinguishes the human brain from other brains is its ability to construct and understand abstract hierarchies of ideas, as demonstrated by our language and its ability to communicate and facilitate the enhancement of complex ideas.

      The efficiency and power of human settlements is also explained by hierarchical abstraction. When a village becomes large enough, it becomes possible to support an individual specializing in shoe manufacture and repair. Because the cobbler can focus he learns to make better footwear using less time and resources. Now instead of every household needing to know how to make a primitive shoe, it can simply trade something it makes for a better cheaper shoe. Shoe making is now an abstraction in another hierarchical layer of society. The improved shoes makes farmers and soldiers more effective which builds a bigger village which eventually enables a second cobbler, who now competes with the first cobbler making them both more effective, and so on in a self reinforcing feedback loop that continues until some energy or material scarcity constrains growth. Then the feedback loops reverse and the system unwinds.

      Liked by 2 people

      1. I should have also mentioned that the extended theory of mind that enabled the emergence of behaviorally modern humans is also a hierarchical abstraction.

        Our brain effectively created an abstract class called “human” and assigned that class to both “others” and “self”. This gave us the ability to more effectively cooperate as a superorganism, and to understand that when we observed an “other” die it meant “self” was mortal too, so we created gods (aka life after death) using our tendency to deny unpleasant realities that co-evolved with our extended theory of mind.

        Like

        1. This theory is too complex to explain it to the masses and therefore will collapse. 🤣

          Seriously though. I think that Hideaway has the best complete analysis of the ECOC and ECOM predicament.

          Liked by 1 person

      2. Rob…. “One key feature (besides denial) that distinguishes the human brain from other brains is its ability to construct and understand abstract hierarchies of ideas, as demonstrated by our language and its ability to communicate and facilitate the enhancement of complex ideas.

        I do wonder about other animals like Elephants, Whales and Dolphins, that have large brains, and also have this ability, but we just don’t understand their use of such intelligence.

        Perhaps they have enough intelligence to know that destroying the surrounding ecosystem is a bad idea and communicate this to each other. They all definitely communicate with each other very effectively so have what we would consider ‘language’, that we just don’t (and probably can’t) understand.

        The part about our energy use going to access lower grades of metals and minerals and lower fossil energy sources, in a mad rush to build more energy machines ,fusion, fission, solar, wind, geothermal, batteries, EVs etc, being the equivalent of a large star fusing iron, which uses energy instead of providing energy, scares the hell out of me, as it means we are much closer to collapse than I thought..

        I only thought of this connection/analogy when I realised the Jevon’s paradox effect of complexity working on all lower forms of material gathering. The cheapness of the complexity as it’s used on such a scale, means simple tractors are not so simple anymore. We now rely upon computer guided tractors assisted with GPS location for planting and harvesting grain crops to get maximum yields.

        Go back to old tractors, which are less fuel efficient and the yield is lower as the farmer cannot get the exact distance apart for plants as accurately as the computers.. likewise for spraying, fertilizing, harvesting. Any retracement of complexity, means less efficiency, lower yields, more fertilizer, fuel and sprays in an attempt to compensate. It’s exactly the same for every mining operation and every other operation where we use the natural world for our benefit.

        Liked by 2 people

        1. I do wonder about other animals like Elephants, Whales and Dolphins, that have large brains, and also have this ability, but we just don’t understand their use of such intelligence.

          There’s a gradient of abilities in brains and some species like those you mentioned have high intelligence, theory of mind, and communication skills. None of them however are discussing the standard model or calculus, nor are they killing each other over which god is the correct god to pray to for eternal life. There’s a huge gap between humans and all other species.

          Liked by 1 person

          1. And of course, that huge gap is caused by doing the one and only thing that nobody else does.

            I failed to annoy Art in my comment yesterday. Here’s what he said:

            Appreciate your thoughts, even if I don’t share them. If fire doesn’t belong in the equation for living in balance with nature, where do you draw the line?
            Do we strip out all technology—arrows, spears, stone tools, language?
            Follow that logic far enough, and humans wouldn’t have lasted 10,000 years.

            Not sure what he’s saying. But I think it’s along the normal human supremacy logic of, “But without fire and the other technology, humans would have had a much shorter run in the history books… and you and I would’ve never been born.”

            Which I would answer back with, “Yes, but you make it sound like that’s a bad thing. Sounds exactly how it should’ve gone down in the history books to me. But humans dodged that fate by cheating (fire) and because of it, we are now responsible for the only species induced mass extinction that this planet (perhaps galaxy) will ever see.”

            Liked by 1 person

            1. Looks like I actually might’ve struck a nerve with Art. He had some time to sleep on it and replied again to my comment.

              You can’t just claim fire led to the human predicament—you need data to back it up.

              Evidence from Wonderwerk Cave (South Africa) and Gesher Benot Ya’aqov (Israel) shows hominids controlled fire at least 1 million years ago, and it was widespread by the time Homo sapiens emerged (~300,000 years ago).

              Yet, for nearly 300,000 years, human population remained stable at under 1 million.

              The first measurable population growth didn’t begin until ~10,000 years ago, with the Neolithic Revolution and the shift to agriculture. There’s no evidence that fire alone caused population increases, species declines, or pollution spikes—including carbon emissions—until farming enabled large-scale ecological transformation.

              If you’re making a claim, you need evidence—not just a story that fits your narrative.

              Guess I’ll have to put on my David Attenborough field costume and go digging for the evidence. While I’m at it, I’ll gather all the evidence that shows sapiens were zapped with full consciousness around 100-200kya. When I’m done with that, I’ll move onto proving once and for all that God does not exist.😊

              I don’t think Art sees the big picture. And based on his 2nd to last paragraph, I’m not even sure if he believes this totally common-sense statement: the only possible way to get to agriculture is by way of conquering fire.

              Like

              1. You might ask Berman why when he predicted a near-term decline in oil supply he provided compelling evidence, and then when he reversed his prediction claiming there is no near-term oil supply threat he provided no evidence, nor did he explain why the original evidence was wrong.

                On the god issue, just a reminder that the interesting bit is not whether god exists, the interesting bit is why did god emerge simultaneous with behaviorally modern humans, and why has every tribe, in every location, ever since, believed in god, and why does every single one of those thousands of religions have at its core a belief in life after death, and why does no other species believe in gods?

                Liked by 1 person

    2. The difference is we have intelligence and cooperation to work around & slow down the process of rapid collapse into a possible contraction. Purely physical systems like the stars do not and hence their rapid collapse is inevitable.

      We cannot defy the law of physics, but we do have a shot at slowing down the rapid & disastrous collapse you guys here seem to blindly believe based on one person’s idea. How well we do then depends on the level of cooperation amongst human (which unfortunately is not high).

      Like

      1. Hi Nony, …. “The difference is we have intelligence and cooperation to work around & slow down the process of rapid collapse into a possible contraction.

        Can you please explain how intelligence and cooperation work around the physics of entropy and dissipation of the materials we use back into the environment, plus how a process of degrowth of everything, including complexity also works.

        How do we gain access to really low grade energy, metals and minerals without the modern complexity of the required modern technology in gaining access to these things?

        I’m looking for this type of feedback, as I’d really like to be wrong about all this!!

        Also given the history of past civilizations and current direction of humanity as a whole, how likely do you really think our intelligence and cooperation are really going to slow down the process of rapid collapse??

        Liked by 4 people

        1. Don’t get me wrong. I agree with everything that you are saying about the collapse of complexity based on limits of physics and entropy.. apart from the speed of collapse.

          I cannot explain in detail because the whole system is too complex for one person to understand. I’m just thinking along the lines of – as one part or several parts (of the entire system) faces decline, as a community of living things we will naturally attempt to work around it with everything we have, even if it’s just to slow down the “collapse”. This can be in the form of increased competition (wars) for the limited resources or increased cooperation though the former is more likely.

          To the observer embroiled within the competition zones it may seem like a rapid collapse, but taking a vantage point above the entire civilization, it may look like an overall gradual decline with certain pockets facing faster declines while the others remaining stable, and these pockets undergoing declines may change regions over time with the overall effect being the decline of civilization back to a more primitive way of life.

          It may that because of complexity every part is interconnected worldwide and that will lead to a domino effect of collapse. That’s true if you consider every aspect of our industrial civilisation. But are these modern things really necessary? We can always channel the limited resources we have towards the non-discretionary only especially agriculture. (even if it’s just by increasing the number of manual workers in the fields without machines and reduction in livestocks farming). It’s only the poor city dwellers like me that will suffer more if there’s a food collapse.

          I do not have children. I require very little in life to be happy, and I belong to team nature (ironically as a city person). So i don’t think i have any cognitive biases here.

          Liked by 1 person

          1. Yes (to both your comments).

            As you may already be aware, I have had this conversation multiple times with Hideaway before. At this point, it’s a matter of belief, or rather, should I say, conviction about the nature of reality. As I don’t really know myself how things will play out, I just respect there can be several ways to see the world and now (try to) shut up.

            In any case, more fundamentally, to me, now, life is not about getting there, avoiding that, etc. Just presence suffices. Ahh, I don’t know how to express it…

            On a more practical note, I recently finished reading this book: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/989670.The_Humanure_Handbook (https://library.uniteddiversity.coop/Ecological_Building/Compost_Toilets/Humanure_Handbook.pdf) and that one https://books.google.fr/books/about/Vida_em_Sintropia.html?id=0vmdEAAAQBAJ (not available in english).

            Anyway, thank you for sharing your thoughts.

            Like

          2. Hi Ian, thanks for the response..

            It may that because of complexity every part is interconnected worldwide and that will lead to a domino effect of collapse.”

            This is what I’m expecting in the future when overall energy availability starts to decline at an accelerating rate, assuming nothing else breaks first.

            I expect the first part of collapse to be debt defaults and financial chaos, brought on by inflation that CBs and govts cannot control. People in the Western nations are already suffering from a ‘cost of living crises’ that no-one in the mainstream attributes to the combination of higher energy costs and higher energy costs of minerals and metals, plus the burden of unattributed inflation in asset costs, which is real inflation to those without assets.

            But are these modern things really necessary? We can always channel the limited resources we have towards the non-discretionary only especially agriculture. (even if it’s just by increasing the number of manual workers in the fields without machines and reduction in livestocks farming)

            Firstly the “modern things” really are necessary in the mining of fossil fuel energy, and metals and minerals. The grades of nearly everything are so low, that only our complexity with high energy use is keeping the flow going. The simple steel tools, still comes from iron ore mined in Australia, shipped to China, smelted there, forged into tools there, then shipped overseas, to large ports, then transported by diesel trucks to the nearest “shop/shops” to wherever you live.

            In a collapse situation, where central control goes out the window, where does the cooperation and coordination towards non discretionary agriculture, with more manual workers come from? Who is directing whom to become the manual laborers when they use to be teachers or engineers or managers or hairdressers in the city? Where is the accommodation and facilities for all these extra workers, close to the farms, which use to be huge grain enterprises with large tractors and very few workers. Where and how does food get to these new manual laborers, who enforces that they don’t breed animals for their own use with almost nothing going back to the cities?

            Realistically, I look at past civilization collapses for a guide on the way down, except this time we have 8.2B humans, not a few hundred thousand to a couple of million like previous civilization collapses. The prior civilization collapses all had plenty of virgin forest/jungle for the refugees from collapse to retreat to, we no longer have that luxury.

            Liked by 2 people

            1. I forgot to add how we are leaving the Holocene very rapidly with the damage we’ve done to the climate and environment, so what makes the odds of any type of agriculture possible in such a situation?

              We were never able to settle into any type of civilization before the Holocene, despite 100,000+ years of Homo sapiens existence, so why will the future with wild climate and weather conditions make it possible?

              Like

          3. I’ll reply here to avoid the continue narrowing of threads.

            Thanks for the replies. I would think the serious limiting factor is the amount of arable land we have left for agriculture (which means i’ll have to “escape” somewhere with this in mind in future). As for coordination & control and tools/equipment availability, that may actually be less of an issue at least at the initial stages. I did read somewhere that farming is actually a lot more difficult than what an inexperience person like me tend to assume though.

            But like Charles said I still think we can’t know for sure what will happen. There’s an entire spectrum of possibilities and severity for how this will play out. Time will tell!

            Like

            1. I did read somewhere that farming is actually a lot more difficult than what an inexperience person like me tend to assume though.

              It is. I would say, like every complex skill, you need 10 years of regular practice (by that I mean, roughly the weekly time of at least a part-time job) to see the whole picture. Then is the start of the path towards mastery.

              Maybe, it can go faster if you have a skilled teacher and are not stubborn like me (meaning that, you follow your teacher’s way and do not try to find yours)

              But, that’s if you want to keep doing things the way they have been done and are thus bound to continue failing.

              So the reason I didn’t want to follow any teacher’s way is that agriculture, as practiced in the mainstream, doesn’t feel right to me (even at a low scale): it is extractive, destructive, goes counter-flow of natural processes. Just plain evil: raze the ground, then till, then plant your plants, then fight every plants and animals except yours and provide everything for your plants, then harvest and repeat. Human centered all the way. Full of separation and dominion. To me, this is not a way which can work for very long. And indeed it does not.

              However, I think part of the difficulty comes from the fact that we usually approach the task in a purely technical manner (because our culture tells us so), rather than be guided by the heart. And another part of the difficulty comes from the fact that we are starting (in most places on earth), from extremely degraded land.

              Ernst Gotsch presents the way life travels through space and time with this graph:

              In his interpretation, life naturally follows a path of aggradation leading to an increase in complexity, the natural succession. It goes in a direction opposite to entropy: life creates more life.

              Except human beings and their domesticated animals. (Ernst opinion is that some human groups did not adapt to the forest gaining ground because of the deglaciation happening 12000 years ago, and so they started waging war on the forests to keep the conditions of the steppes. I don’t know it that’s true. It’s a fun story to tell, though)

              Anyway, Ernst Gotsch distinguishes three broad systems in this succession: colonization, accumulation and abundance. Colonization corresponds to the bootstraping of life (from bare rock to the first soil and plants), then accumulation starts until there is enough dead organic matter to cover the soil all year long, then is the start of abundance.

              Each system has the life forms (and thus plants and animals) which are appropriate to its specific conditions (and needs). Basically, human beings are animals of the abundance phase.

              Because of the way (most) agriculture has been practiced and other human impacts, most agriculture is now done on land that has regressed to “accumulation”. And it cannot work: the soil requires the accumulation plants (which this culture calls weeds, hence tilling and herbicides), the plants are not adapted (they require too much, hence fertilizers), pests attacks sick maladapted plants which are going to further deplete a fragile soil (hence pesticides).

              All our “solutions” stem from our misunderstanding of the natural processes of life, of an incorrect interpretation, of a war against natural flows, (solutions to problems created from previous solutions <= that’s not Gotsch, but Fukuoka, among others).

              So this starts to change (individually and collectively), the day we stop waging war. Farming methods which do not go counter-flow but act in the same direction as life are a way to travel together with life towards abundance. And, once the system is back to abundance, are easier, effortless (in the sense of the absence of friction, more optimal). But, most places are very degraded, and human beings (me included) are still going in all sort of strange directions, and skills are lacking, and there are many humans, and, and, and (all which Hideaway and other depressed and rightly so collapsnik will tell you). So, I guess, a man reaps what he sows.

              Real change starts in our heart, with the desire for life, striving to observe and listen, finding pleasure and our function in the living community, in service to the macro-organism. (I know this sounds cheesy: but is it? Or are we programmed by 12000 years of bad habits?)

              I try to follow natural farming (Masanobu Fukuoka) and syntropic farming (Ernst Götsch). To me, both are saying roughly the same thing, but within different philosophical frameworks, cultural traditions and diffferent (not really opposing) technical details. Only Ernst Götsch is probably bolder on following natural succession further along its path. Fukuoka had some more luxury for time and a more primitive, less scientific outlook. Both are dear to me, as well as Anastassia Makarieva with the theory of the biotic pump.

              Today, I was in the mood for writing all this. Just my opinions 🙂
              There, really, at this point, are no guarantee. That is, for those who are expecting a particular outcome.

              Still, there can be joy, there is constant renewal, there is.

              Liked by 1 person

              1. 40 years ago if anyone wanted to build a shed on their farm for whatever purpose, you went and built the shed, or contracted someone to do it.

                Now if you want to build a shed for some purpose, you have to get a planning permit, including technical details (from professional services at your cost) to make sure it’s going to be compliant in a number of ways. It often takes several different professional services to write reports to pass the ‘planning’ aspect.

                Then you need a building permit, to make sure it’s compliant with relevant building codes, again more cost. Then you either build it yourself or get a contractor to do it, once you have gone past all the permits..

                To farm, you need money and a money source, plus you are in competition with other farmers, who are all trying to make money to pay all the costs involved and eke out an existence for themselves and their families. There are rates to pay, land tax, water access fees, insurance, most of these have gone up in price well in excess of official inflation. Small farms are subject to exactly the same packaging and handling rules and regulations for products sold to the public, all in the name of ‘food safety’ or ‘quality control’ and end up with approximately the same hurdles to pass as large corporate farms.

                The larger the farm, the less per acre is paid in all these types of fees and expenses. These farms also have economies of scale in using less labor per unit area by having large machinery often automated if large enough. The system we live in favors the economies of scale, which is making the small farm less viable, unless you have a favorable niche market, which only will work in relatively good times.

                I expect the situation to be more skewed towards larger farms as we head into collapse, as the system sees these as more efficient, which they are in energy terms, of what produces a lot of food for cities, despite being totally reliant on fossil fuels.

                Lack of oil (diesel) in particular, along with fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides etc, will effect the corporate large farms far more than small farms far faster. Food just not getting to cities will be one of largest signs of very immanent collapse, but I still expect govts to be pushing for larger farms right up to the point where they lose control.

                This is also before we consider the rapidly changing climate that is likely to make any form of agriculture unviable anyway, which seems to be overlooked too often, because all of us have denial genes that kick in when something threatens our world and life view …

                Liked by 2 people

                1. Yes. The system is crazy, obsolete. Just let it rot and die.

                  At some time, a lucrative and useful (but not that easy) business may be to take some 0 rate credit from the system desperate to make more liquidities, buy the land of a large agricultural exploitation (see the vocabulary we are using in our culture), divide it in smaller plots and sell them individually (that is, if there are still property rights, notaries, land registers by then…)
                  Basically the same idea as real estate, but in the opposite direction.
                  That’s just a random idea: I certainly don’t have the guts, energy, means to do that 🙂 I just lower my expectations and try to avoid the crazy system.

                  You are right. Farming as a business has most probably a limited timespan. Farming has a limited timespan. And in a way, that’s what is beautiful with Ernst method: you enrich the whole community of life while getting something that you need. You accomplish your function and get rewarded for it. Guided by inner pleasure. And in the end, there is (in most part of the world) a forest: you did your part in getting the location revert back to where the macro-organism wants it to be, instead of fighting, struggling constantly.

                  Yes, there are no easy answers and we all love different things.

                  Best.

                  Liked by 1 person

              2. Nice.

                I agree it takes about 10 years to become competent at growing food. I think farming requires a certain mindset able to accept failures that are outside of your control, and it’s hard physical work often in crappy conditions, for very little financial return, so a prerequisite I think is you have to love it. I don’t think I fit the profile so I’ve struck a compromise by helping a farm with things I’m good at like infrastructure, repairs, construction, tech, etc.

                I do hope to have a few of my own beds again this year but I’m going to focus on fewer crops that I enjoy eating, keep well into winter, and are not too hard to grow like spinach, kale, carrots, and beets. The beets I grew last year are keeping well in the fridge and I’m still eating them. Just made another 2L batch of refrigerator pickled beets.

                Like

                1. Thank you.

                  I do hope to have a few of my own beds again this year but I’m going to focus on fewer crops that I enjoy eating, keep well into winter, and are not too hard to grow like spinach, kale, carrots, and beets. The beets I grew last year are keeping well in the fridge and I’m still eating them. Just made another 2L batch of refrigerator pickled beets.

                  That’s great.

                  Like

  9. There is a trend in the US of removing old or poorly placed freeways (I don’t know if that trend will continue under Trump)

    https://usa.streetsblog.org/2023/04/19/these-10-urban-freeways-deserve-to-be-demolished-but-will-they
    From a perspective of peak oil and climate change, it actually makes sense to be removing some of those freeways.

    1. Removing freeways (especially in central cities) can make the city less dependent of private automobiles and can also free up the land occupied by the freeway.
    2. Removing the freeway can also reduce maintenance costs in the long run.

    The US is already struggling to maintain its infrastructure and freeway removal can be a way to collapse now and avoid the rush.

    Like

    1. Roads, freeways, tollways, railways, water mains, gas pipelines, electric transmission lines, phone lines, etc, are the equivalent to an organisms arteries, veins, lymphatic system, nervous system etc. They are all seemingly a small part of the whole, yet the function of the whole relies upon them.

      Eventually all the internal networks of an organism start to fail as it gets towards the end of it’s life. However sometimes during the earlier stages of life some of these networks or parts of them fail, causing either minimal damage or catastrophic damage to the whole.

      A thick vein in the leg might become clogged, and surrounding veins expand to take up the blood flow, in which case all is good, providing the blockage doesn’t move to a more important area, like the lungs. A similar sized blockage in a pulmonary vein can be catastrophic to the entire organism.

      Will we only close the “important” freeways while managing or maintaining the rest? The problem is no-one wants to collapse first and avoid the rush, far more likely we all collapse together or very closely to each other part of civilization…

      Liked by 1 person

  10. A bizarre flip flop, then woo, now contradictions with prior contradictions. I have no idea what’s going on in Berman’s brain. It seems scrambled.

    https://www.artberman.com/blog/solutions-the-art-of-avoiding-reality/

    Modern society runs on the myth of endless progress—the belief that every problem has a solution. This fuels relentless action and blind optimism, even when realism is needed. We cling to solutions as a way to maintain control in an uncertain world, unwilling to accept that some problems have no easy fix or demand painful sacrifices.

    The drive for solutions is a defense mechanism against discomfort. Facing limits and loss is painful, so we distract ourselves with fixes instead of reckoning with reality. Politicians, CEOs, and activists push simplistic fixes that sound good but don’t work.

    I wrote this to offer perspective to the many people who thoughtfully engaged with my recent post. I’m not claiming to have answers—because I don’t.

    But I do know this: chasing solutions without deeper understanding isn’t progress—it’s just accelerating the next disaster.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. I fully agree with this post of Art’s, it seems he’s either come to the conclusion that there are no solutions, civilization heads where it heads until it collapses itself and probably takes most of the natural world with it, or he’s rapidly coming to that conclusion.

      Liked by 1 person

        1. I think it’s because he has not put the big picture together yet of how it’s a combination of many aspects that guarantee the collapse of modern civilization, yet he grasps a lot of the separate pieces and treats them as separate instead of part of the whole.

          Most people in the doom sphere are similar, they grab on to their bit of understanding of what’s not possible, so think collapse for one or a few reasons, but don’t grasp the importance of other areas they haven’t researched as a part of the whole picture.

          I’m still learning and researching as I’m sure i don’t have a grasp of the interactions of every aspect yet…

          By the same token people who have been hanging out here at un-denial seem to have the best grasp of the overall reality, and we are a small group….

          Liked by 4 people

    2. I left this comment, but it’s not showing yet. See if I can get Art pissed off😊
      _______________

      Fire leads to full consciousness, which then leads to domestication, agriculture, and mining. Which then leads to fossil energy, which then leads to self-induced mass extinction.

      Most advanced overshoot aware people can agree with the above… but for some reason they can’t agree with the below:

      Those good ole days of “maintaining balance with nature”…. is just a stage in the process that cannot be prolonged. Very similar to when Old World collided with New World. The Native Americans were at a stage in the process where they looked “good” compared to the stage in the process where the “evil” Europeans were at. But the Natives would have gotten to that European level eventually (with time and energy). Just like those Colonialists used to be “good” back when they were in their earlier stage of the process (3000BC Mesopotamia?).

      No species that conquers fire can ever fit in with the web of life. At certain stages it might appear possible, but it’s just an illusion. Let it play out and it will always end up miserably for everyone else. The easiest solution is to remove the fire users. Hence the mass extinction that comes guaranteed when you start playing with fossil fuels. Yes, lots of innocent victims perish, but it’s the only way for Mother Earth to rid herself of the megacancer called humans.

      Liked by 2 people

      1. I’d add that conquering fire gives whatever species a huge amount of excess energy available, that then leads to consciousness and all the other aspects you mention. It still took hundreds of thousands of years to lead to Agriculture as the climate was not ‘right’ for the development of Agriculture..

        Liked by 2 people

        1. Thanks.

          Ya, I can’t imagine what those early years of MORT were like for you. At that stage where you understood it and it made perfect sense… yet you couldn’t convey it clearly and concisely (kind of like where I am still at for a lot of these topics)

          Luckily for me, fire is like algebra101… MORT is more like calculus😊.

          Liked by 2 people

  11. Stumbled onto this movie last night. Caught my attention because I’m a cat person. Only put it on because I thought it was a silly cartoon and I wanted to give my cat some tv time while I was busy doing something else (yes, I have corrupted my Empire Kitty into being a couch potato😊).

    But from the opening scene I was hooked. Cannot recommend this film enough. Here’s a few snippets from reddit that will give you an idea what it’s about:

    The plot follows a black cat, a solitary survivor on a post-human planet seemingly healing from humanity’s scars. The feline’s journey is both physical and symbolic: it must leave the safety of its island-marked by decayed monuments and submerged ruins-and embark on a voyage of collaboration and self-discovery.

    For me, this film felt like a dream, where my accumulated memories came alive. Echoes of What Dreams May Come, Avatar, Waterworld, and Life of Pi all seemed to coexist within it. It’s a world where animals are both anthropomorphic and raw in their true forms. This isn’t just a film-it’s a journey through a surreal and subconscious realm.

    I need more dialogue-free films. This film is a meditation. One of the more unique things about it is that the creators had the brilliant idea to set the anthropomorphization setting for the non-human characters to about 25%, instead of the usual 75-100% where the characters might as well be humans in animal costumes. The characters’ behaviors in Flow feel entirely natural for their species — It’s just that their intelligence has been enhanced enough to allow them greater self-reflection and interspecies communication.

    Liked by 1 person

  12. https://peakoilbarrel.com/short-term-energy-outlook-february-2025/#comment-786216

    HHH: Not all governments have the fortune of their short term debt being the collateral that underpins the entire global monetary system.

    There is unbelievable demand for US T-bills. The US government is in no way shape or form in danger of not being able to fund itself.

    The lie that central banks are the center of the monetary universe is perpetuated widely. But reality is commercial banks don’t need bank reserves to make loans. Never have and never will.

    As unemployment picks up through out the rest of the year and demand along with long term bond yields fall. And oil prices fall, and interest rate cuts start happening rapidly. The interest paid on government debt will fall dramatically.

    It’s just what a contraction looks like. There is a reason why the government is talking about giving every tax payer $5000.00 Which amounts to a stimulus check.

    It would amount to a replay of pandemic stimulus. We’d see a weaker dollar for awhile while the stimulus ran it’s course then the dollar would spike higher as it would amount to a one off stimulus.

    Growth nowadays requires artificial stimulus. Growth in China requires artificial stimulus in the US to create demand. Think about how profound that is.

    Liked by 1 person

  13. I’m about half way through RFK’s book The Wuhan Cover-Up.

    I’m finding it tough going. It’s very dense with crazy-making fact after crazy-making fact.

    It’s also a little scary that (so far anyway) RFK doesn’t seem to understand the most important WHY? any better than I do.

    For example, the US government gave big money to China many times through many channels to fund bioweapons research. Why? It makes no sense to fund an enemy to make weapons that could be used against you. Unless maybe it’s not actually a weapon???

    Also eye opening is the control China has over the science journals which explains in part the lab leak coverup.

    Still no insight into why China avoided mRNA transfections.

    Like

  14. https://futurocienciaficcionymatrix.blogspot.com/2025/02/el-inexorable-colapso.html

    Why are we getting upset? Human biology is not suitable for the civilizations that have developed so far.
    Of course, this is often suppressed and denied.

    Saludos

    el mar

    We don’t know how long the system will hold. But what we are seeing tells us not long.

    When the collapse begins it will be very fast. Do not expect catabolic collapses or organized decreases. The system is designed for perpetual growth and an existential crisis that implies a continuous decrease, will create an almost immediate negative feedback, because debt levels are incompatible with an economic decrease. Failing to repay debts, bankruptcies will be gigantic, consumption will suffer immediately and the CB’s strategy of flooding society with money will no longer function as in the past, as inflation is present. What we will achieve is an flight of money towards assets and a galloping hyperinflation, as soon as the income earners detect the immediate loss of the value of money. This time, the CBs will try (as in 2008-2020), but they won’t make it, because inflation is already present in the system. The prices of hard assets only grow and the final speculation of the system with the creation of multiple bubbles, is nothing more than the consequence of the massive monetary expansion.

    The end is near and it is only a matter of time. But it is not for a single reason, but for the evolution of the civilizing system itself. We just got as far as possible…

    This time it is not that the oil shortage fails or a stock market crash occurs or there is widespread corruption. This time everything is failing at the same time. And therefore, it has no solution.

    We are at the red dot of the following graph.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. Hi el mar, I really like Quark’s work, but I always cringe when I see the above diagram of overshoot of carrying capacity. Most draw it like the diagram above as it looks like we are just a little in overshoot.

      In reality the horizontal carrying capacity line should be 90% further down, well below the words “geometric growth”, then falling after the peak of overshoot (possibly earlier).

      When the human population was 4M we were already vastly changing the environment with our use of fire and extinction of megafauna. I question if even that population/living standard was sustainable for something like a million years, which is still a drop in the ocean of geologic time…

      This part of Quark’s post, is very very relevant…. “This time, it’s not that the oil shortage is failing, or there’s a stock market crash, or there’s widespread corruption. This time, everything is failing at the same time. And that’s why there’s no solution.

      Liked by 4 people

  15. I commented

    15:00 The system believes that we can create wealth by printing fake wealth. That strategy has a limited shelf-life. Our debt-based monetary system, just like any Ponzi scheme, relies on perpetual exponential growth, and when it can no longer grow, it implodes.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. Thanks. Nate pumps out a homerun every once in a while. And just for him mentioning the evolution of Fuddruckers, it was already a great video😊. 

      ps. Mike Judge is awesome. This short clip might be his finest moment (1997)

      Liked by 1 person

  16. Just finished a few chapters in RFK’s The Wuhan Cover-Up that detail the dirty deeds of USAID including triggering the Ukraine war by overthrowing the elected government, and funding GOF research at Wuhan that leaked causing covid.

    Is it a coincidence that Trump took down USAID first?

    I think not.

    Like

    1. That’s funny. My mom and I were talking about this last night because some of her sources are saying the same thing. 

      We were contemplating if we should cash out our retirement. We were guessing what a stock market crash might mean to the banks. We figure they would shut down immediately to prevent people from taking their money out. And then guessing what that might mean and so on.

      My mom then says “ya, but they would have to open the banks pretty soon after that”. I was confused so I asked her what she meant. “So that everyone could still pay their bills”, she said. She could tell by my reaction (I fell face down on the floor😊) that I was not in agreement. I started to tell her how “paying bills” would be over at that point… same with going to work… same with grocery stores having food… I stopped myself from going into full on collapse mode because I could sense her fear. She had one more thing to add though, “ok, maybe car payments and credit card bills would go unpaid for a while, but the electric company is still going to be expecting payment, so the banks would have to be open for that. I politely said, “good point” and ended the conversation.

      Holy shit! And she lives with me and hears my crazy doomerism every day. Now I know why so many people are gonna fall for that brilliant emergency advice the politicians gave a while back, “make sure you have three days worth of food in case the grid goes down”… Whew, it’s gonna be ugly😊.

      The timebomb factor is what’s making this so crazy though. Could be tomorrow, or not for another decade. Keeping your sanity till that timebomb goes off is gonna be very challenging.

      Liked by 2 people

      1. LOL! I don’t think a total collapse is what CP was talking about. Nor me.

        Just the stock market correcting to more normal valuations.

        The total collapse will probably come when oil supply starts falling no matter what they do as Hideaway predicts.

        Like

        1. Ah, gotcha. For some reason “stock market crash” always equals the great crash of 1929 for me. Jeez, my clueless mother was probably more accurate than me in our conversation. LOL  

          ps. Speaking of CP, I have an all-time favorite moment with him. Was a while back when his guest was breaking down what currency’s will be best when SHTF. The guest was not talking good about gold and that had Nate squirming around and asking childish “what if” questions to try and make gold look better. It became quite obvious that he’s sitting on a ton of gold. Was hilarious.

          I dont follow his channel so I’m sure I got the link here. Do you have any idea which episode or who that guest was? (I’m too lazy to search the comments)

          Like

          1. Sorry I don’t remember that episode. He interviewed someone yesterday who argued in favor of gold.

            Personally, if I had to choose between $1000 of canned meat and $1000 of gold I’d take the cans.

            If I had all the supplies I wanted and had some savings I’d put 50% in gold and 50% in cash. That way you’re covered for inflation, deflation, a stock market monkey panic, and the banks closing.

            Liked by 1 person

          2. “The guest was not talking good about gold and that had Nate squirming around and asking childish “what if” questions to try and make gold look better. It became quite obvious that he’s sitting on a ton of gold.”

            That was written like you were in a mood or you dislike Canadian Prepper / Nate Polson. He obviously has some gold, but none of us are privy to the actual relationship
            – is it real ownership, paid cash
            – or maybe purchased using credit

            I see a man running a business and sensible enough not to necessarily confront/discuss the real unpalatable truths. Prof. Nate Hagens and many others are exactly the same.

            If Polson is relying on leverage (easy credit) to:
            – fill his warehouse
            – buy his 160 acres, 2013 McMansion with 3 car garage
            – buy gold, etc.

            Then maybe he is hoping that SHTF will be a hard full stop with no institutions to perform foreclosure, call in his debts. A slow decline, ironically is much worse, with mortgage margin calls and Blackrock sucking up everything.

            Like

            1. I’m still not certain how much awareness Nate Polson has on the overshoot threat. I watch closely. He gets climate change, and debt, and war, but I’m not so sure about over population and energy/mineral depletion.

              I see a man struggling like the rest of us.

              About a year ago the threat of Ukraine escalating into nuclear war freaked him out (as it did me). This seems to have spurred him to make the big decision to buy and build a doomstead farm. I’m guessing he’s just beginning to understand what a big commitment of time, effort, and money this is, especially when you’re also trying to run a business.

              Today he’s worried about a market crash and has hinted he expects his business to go bankrupt. He’s also concerned about political trends in Canada (as am I) and now he’s talking about moving to the US.

              I told him we should get behind Trump’s plan to take over Canada but he didn’t reply so I don’t know if he saw it.

              Liked by 1 person

            2. I’m not a fan of CP. Don’t hate him or anything, just annoys me with that schtick “I know that last time I did a video like this I told you guys it was the most important video of my life… but this time I really mean it”

              Or maybe I’m just jealous that he figured out how to make ridiculous money from fearmongering.

              Like

              1. I watch CP with my skepticism filter dialed up to max.

                He sometimes spots things other miss, occasionally connects an interesting dot, and is often an entertaining distraction to listen to while I work on my media hobby.

                His interviews are usually excellent and he should do more. I dislike his prepping tips and find most of them childish and naive.

                Liked by 1 person

  17. The pope is sick, maybe dying.

    What is the pope’s position on covid mRNA transfections?

    Grok: Pope Francis has expressed strong support for COVID-19 vaccines, including those developed using mRNA technology, such as the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines. He has consistently framed vaccination as a moral and ethical responsibility, emphasizing its role in protecting individual health and promoting the common good. In January 2021, he announced his intention to receive the vaccine, stating in an interview with Italy’s TG5 that “ethically everyone should take the vaccine” because it safeguards not only one’s own life but also the lives of others. He described refusal to vaccinate as a “suicidal denialism” that he found difficult to understand, given the scientific consensus on the vaccines’ safety and efficacy.

    This morning they announced he has a kidney problem, in addition to pneumonia.

    Kidney damage is a side effect of mRNA transfections.

    Liked by 1 person

        1. I’m not religious either. I was just saying that since he is 88 years old, his health problems aren’t necessarily caused by MRNA. If he were younger, I would say that MRNA is the likely culprit.

          Like

          1. I understand and understood.

            My god doesn’t care. He’s an eye for an eye vengeful deity. Recall that he burned down Notre-Dame Cathedral as payback for the pope turning a blind eye to his priests raping little boys.

            Liked by 1 person

  18. Maybe humans need large predators around to filter out stupidity like this.

    https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/national/24956420.tiktokers-dropping-heavy-objects-feet-viral-trend-risk-lifetime-pain/

    TikTokers dropping heavy objects on feet in viral trend ‘risk lifetime of pain’

    A podiatrist has said TikTok users risk “a lifetime of pain and disability” by copying a viral trend to drop objects including air fryers and toasters on their feet.

    Creators on the short-form app have shared videos of themselves dropping heavy objects – including a vacuum cleaner, a glass jug and a wooden table – on their foot and ranking how painful each item is.

    The hashtag #droppingthingsonmyfoot has been used on hundreds of videos.

    Like

        1. That’s what they do here when a cougar is seen anywhere near humans. They hire trackers with dogs, tree the cougar, and shoot it. Really pisses me off. We have a surplus of children and pets. Cougars are rare. In all my years working and hiking in the forests here I have never seen a cougar in the wild.

          Like

  19. Headline news this morning was Starmer’s speech in which he announced the biggest increase in military spending since the cold war to counter the Russian “threat”. The UK leads the collapse of advanced countries. They have no resources and their debt and population are way too high. Military spending will accelerate their collapse. When you look at a map of Europe with UK as a little island on the west side, and Ukraine a long way away on the east side, you wonder WTF he’s talking about. And yet the hatred/fear in his voice seems real. UK elites really are behaving like monkeys in denial.

    Liked by 3 people

  20. Good essay by Alan Urban comparing past false alarms with today.

    Are doomers deluding themselves again?

    https://www.collapsemusings.com/i-believe-the-world-is-ending-does-that-make-me-crazy/

    I Believe The World Is Ending – Does That Make Me Crazy?

    If you tell the average person that the world is ending, they’ll look at you the same way they’d look at a guy standing on a street corner, screaming and holding a sign that says, “The end is near.” Trust me, I know.

    It’s a shame climate change doesn’t work like Y2K. If we knew for a fact that climate change would collapse civilization on, say, January 1st 2050, and fixing it would only cost a few hundred billion dollars, then I’m sure we would stop it in time. Sadly, climate change is a slow-moving crisis, and humans aren’t wired to deal with crises like that.

    Anyway, New Years Eve 1999 finally arrived. I watched TV as countries around the world rang in the new year. First it was New Zealand, then Australia, then Japan. One country after another celebrated with lights and fireworks, and there were no power outages, no planes falling out of the sky, no hordes of people mobbing the stores and killing each other in the streets.

    Nothing.

    My mom watched TV with me, and her face was white. She didn’t say much, but she kept complaining that she felt sick to her stomach. In order to buy that land, my parents had cashed out their 401ks. They had left their friends, family, and jobs behind in order to prepare for the end of the world. But the world wasn’t ending.

    Unlike Y2K and the rapture, the collapse isn’t a single event. It’s not a thing that will happen at some point in the future. The collapse is happening right now, and the evidence is everywhere.

    You can see it in higher prices, melting ice caps, dwindling oil reserves, the rise of fascism, declining living standards, record-breaking temperatures, the disappearance of forests, the drying up of aquifers, the collapse biodiversity, the exponential growth of pollution, the ever-worsening “natural” disasters, the failure of green energy to replace fossil fuels, and so much more.

    But don’t take my word for it. Listen to the experts. Tens of thousands of scientists from around the world are warning that we are heading toward total collapse later this century. Just ask the average climate scientist how they feel about what’s going on, and most of them will admit that we’re basically fucked.

    And that’s just in regard to the climate! Even if there were no climate change, we would still be screwed due to peak oil, pollution, biodiversity loss, and resource depletion. All these things are part of the polycrisis, a collection of crises that amplify one another.

    So you see, there’s no chance that a scientist will make a breakthrough or create some invention that solves all these crises just in time to avert collapse. The polycrisis is too complicated. Even if we invented a source of limitless energy like fusion, we would probably just destroy the planet even faster.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. The boy who cried wolf.. what’s the lesson that should be learned?

      A/ don’t put young amateurs in charge of something important..

      B/ The boy was correct there was a wolf and it did eat the sheep.

      C/ Always have someone else to blame when things go wrong…

      Liked by 1 person

      1. D/ Prep with confidence and purpose, and expect extreme and unanticipated measures by governments to kick the can, knowing this makes predicting the date is impossible, and that the inevitable collapse will be worse than expected.

        Like

    2. I think most people just want simple answers to complex problems and have no mental bandwidth or inclination to dig deeper wether it is collapse,pharma industry, geopolitics or any other topic.

      Just staying with the topic of collapse most people see canada as a safe haven most resilient to collapse. I have friends in Calgary who are completely unconcerned about climate change or any such issue simply because of their location and as such have no interest to dig deeper.

      Their point is Canada produces surplus oil , surplus gas, surplus hydroelectric power and surplus grains and has a low population. This means even if the whole world goes down in flames they will remain relatively unscathed. I am sure Hideaway can completely destroy their illusions with little effort but that would involve connecting the dots of complexity of various industries which is not easy for someone like me so I don’t try to contest their logic.

      Liked by 2 people

      1. Since we have the most overshoot aware crowd here I was curious to know what Canadians like Rob think of the arguments of resiliency usually made. It would also give me some material when I have another conversation like that.

        Like

        1. Since being infected with Hideaway’s extra strength reality I’m less optimistic about Canada.

          The Canada of my childhood was resilient. Today not so much.

          Everything manufactured I buy in the stores is imported. If international trade shuts down, how long do we have before things start to break and there are no spare parts to fix them?

          There is some Canadian food in the stores like milk, eggs, meat, grain, and in season veg. However almost all of this is shipped 150Km to 4000Km on trucks to my community.

          The farm I assist will struggle without fertilizer, plastic for greenhouses, irrigation pumps and parts, and diesel/gas for machines.

          The oil we produce is the expensive stuff that will probably fail first. We do have good hydroelectricity but I wonder how long that will last without spare parts and diesel trucks to service the infrastructure.

          Our leaders, like in most western countries, are REALLY stupid. I worry how they will respond to a real crisis. They were universally brain dead and unethical during covid.

          Since Canada does have some things of value to export, I’d guess we’ll will do better than most countries for a few years, but then it will be a gong show here like everywhere else.

          Liked by 1 person

          1. Thanks for the detailed reply.

            Since you channeled Hideaway I will channel my denialist friends in Calgary and play Devil’s advocate.

            Alberta is a powerhouse in oil and gas industry along with agriculture and forestry. Yes we import heavy machinery as we don’t manufacture them here but as long as there is any industrial capacity left anywhere in the world we albertans will trade our raw materials and obtain the machinery via trade to continue providing them with our resources.

            Oil sands may be difficult to obtain but is much easier compared to offshore oil rigs digging down several thousand feet below the ocean. Its just bitumen mined and heated with natural gas to produce the crude as product. So the equipment we need will be excavators, mining trucks and other such machines. Our gas has not yet depleted as compared to US so that will be a reliable and easy source of energy for us.

            Since we have abundant gas fertilizers should not be a problem at all which means good degree of caloric self sufficiency. We also have massive biomass energy as well.

            I accept your point about spare parts necessity and the fact that we don’t have the manufacturing base to produce the parts that will fail. But we can trade our unlimited resources for those parts and will only collapse after everybody else has and there is nobody left to trade with.

            This will probably take decades and will not be relevant to me or my kids who are in their 20s.

            Like

            1. Those are good arguments. If you’d asked me to steel man their perspective I would have said similar things.

              I wasn’t sure where the Haber-Bosch fertilizer plants were in Canada so I asked Grok. Looks like Alberta is in good shape:

              In Canada, ammonia production is tied closely to the agricultural sector, with major players operating facilities that utilize the Haber-Bosch process. Based on available data, here’s what I can deduce: Canada has a handful of significant ammonia production sites. For instance, Nutrien, one of the world’s largest fertilizer producers, operates multiple plants in Canada, including a major facility in Redwater, Alberta, which is among the country’s largest ammonia production sites. Another key player, CF Industries, runs an ammonia plant in Medicine Hat, Alberta. Yara International also has a facility in Belle Plaine, Saskatchewan, known for producing nitrogen-based fertilizers via ammonia synthesis. Additionally, smaller or older plants, like those once operated by Agrium (now part of Nutrien) in places such as Carseland, Alberta, may contribute to the total.

              As I said before, I expect modernity in Canada will continue longer than in other less resource rich countries. The question is how long? I have this uneasy feeling that modernity is so interconnected and dependent on a 6 continent supply chain plus a functioning financial system with lots of credit, that I could imagine the shortage of some special metal alloy used in the fuel injectors of those oil sands machines might be enough to bring the whole system down.

              I’m not sure. It might not be knowable until we get there.

              Like

              1. P.S.

                I spent a couple formative summers on a family farm in Duffield Alberta when I was about 9 years old. I was a poorish city kid and learned how to drive a tractor and a pickup truck and started to feel like a man doing real work. After a week of hard work our treat was a bottle of coke and a bag of chips on the weekend. No TV, no movie theaters, no gadgets. Just me and my cousins enjoying our chips and telling stories. Then for Sunday dinner my aunt would kill and roast a chicken with veg from her kitchen garden.

                When I was about 18 in university I had a summer job in Eckville Alberta doing operations and maintenance on an oil pipeline. It was such a boring job that I met a rancher in the bar and he hired me. So every evening and weekend I went to his ranch and worked until it was dark. I looked after 1100 head of cattle and cultivated and seeded 300 acres of grain. He raced pony chuckwagons on the weekend so I had the place to myself and a bonus was a freezer full of t-bone steaks which was a real treat for a poor student.

                Liked by 1 person

                1. It sounds like a very wholesome life with deep connections to people and land around you. This is in such sharp contrast to the lives that most people lead today with their addled brains hopelessly addicted to their phones, chasing dopamine hits continuously and hopping from one hedonistic high to another.

                  Even with the deeply rooted life that you had it would take quite a journey to reach a point of overshoot awareness and see the reality but with the kind of fast moving, ‘buy,consume,dispose’ society we have it’s pretty much impossible to even begin to contemplate any of it.

                  Liked by 2 people

            2. Hi Kira, …. “ I am sure Hideaway can completely destroy their illusions with little effort but that would involve connecting the dots of complexity of various industries..

              I’m pretty sure you could destroy their arguments by just following the lines of reasoning…

              The argument is that Alberta can survive longer because we have resources, hydro etc..

              However I’m fairly sure Alberta imports all the machinery, household, electrical goods, transformers and nearly every part of the maintenance of the electrical grid, plus every part required for trucks, pumps for oil lines, etc a long endless list..

              The assumption is the roads, trucks, ports and ships keep working normally to ‘trade’ with partners. How many ports does Alberta have?? Then the assumption that the next state is working normally so all the necessary trade can happen. Then the assumption that the ports and factories in whichever region you are trading all of the necessary imports from also have ports working normally and world shipping working normally.

              The areas that provide all the goods necessary for Alberta to run normally, have to be able to operate normally, so that all the workers turn up to the factories to do the work, plus all the trucks work normally, plus all the imports of raw materials keep flowing into that area, which means all the ports of the raw material exporters need to operate normally, and the mines, plus all the community that supplies all the mines needs to run normally. This takes a lot of machinery and fuel, which comes from factories elsewhere, so other places need to run normally providing all the machinery and fuel, to not just the mines but the whole area/country..

              Once people understand that, everything runs on a 6 continent supply chain of all the necessary minerals, fuel, metals, ore concentrates etc, it’s easy to follow a chain of ‘what’s necessary’ to keep any one area or region going with any type of modernity. Without the modernity of electrical equipment what good is a hydro dam? Without modernity how long can the oil sands be mined? Without the huge electrical pumps pumping oil along pipelines that require regular maintenance, how long before it all fails due to lack of parts from elsewhere in the world?

              Working normally, is a highly complex network of flows of energy and materials around the world, in a way that no-one fully understands all the links. It has worked on growing energy and materials use combined with larger markets for every single aspect of modernity, all built with debt that assumes the system will get larger to pay back the debt.

              I’m pretty sure that when Alberta collapses along with the rest of modernity, most people in denial will be looking for scapegoats to blame for their poor situation.

              It’s simple, complex civilization grows until it can’t, then collapses in on itself. No single area totally reliant on the whole of modern civilization can withstand the collapse. Any minor area (like the USA) that thinks they can survive alone, and tries to build everything they need, will quickly run into the joint problems of not a large enough market, not enough workers to produce everything, lower grade mineral shortages, more people and equipment required for ‘defense’ of supplies of necessary materials form other areas etc.

              Small areas of civilization can only continue with much reduced complexity, but much lower complexity likely means all the ‘resources’ that an area has become just dirt in the ground as it relies on modern large scale complexity to extract and utilize…

              Of course if your friends are like mine when I try to explain all this, they invariable turn to some magic form of undiscovered energy as being the solution, to try and divert the conversation, that they usually start…

              Liked by 3 people

              1. My province British Columbia is on the coast adjacent to the land locked province of Alberta.

                If Alberta wishes to trade with any country other than the US it will need permission to use our ports, and railways, and highways, and pipelines.

                We of course will want the same standard of living as Alberta aspires to so our transit fees will vaporize half of whatever Alberta thinks it has.

                Liked by 1 person

                1. Exactly!! Then what about the Northern states of the USA if Alberta wishes to flow it’s oil through them? Likewise I’m sure!! Then to the East through Canada, they will also want the same..

                  The concept of “our area” will be OK in collapse simply doesn’t and can’t work.

                  Liked by 3 people

                2. I sometimes forget how huge Canada is. It’s like 10 countries joined into one massive country all connected by trucks. I think being next to US is a massive risk factor as when America collapses all the chaos will definitely spill over into Canada. There is also a possibility that the resource rich regions like Alberta suddenly develop “organic protests” for secession from Canada and joining the US if Canada refuses to supply the much needed oil.

                  Being America’s neighbor is like living with a junkie who is functional as long as his drug needs are met but the second he runs out he will go into serious withdrawal and spiral out of control. When that happens he becomes a danger to himself and those around him.

                  Liked by 1 person

                  1. Yes there are a lot of risks living next to the US. In addition to those you mention I imagine a flood of climate change refugees invading from California, and toxic fallout from China nuking the critical Bangor submarine base just south of the border when WWIII starts.

                    Like

                    1. The farm I assist will struggle without fertilizer, plastic for greenhouses, irrigation pumps and parts, and diesel/gas for machines.

                      Based on your experience working on a farm I was hoping you could give me your opinion on the most common belief many people hold about contingency measures that could be deployed after collapse speeds up. I get this especially from my Canadian friends.

                      They say that Canada has a lot of Arable land which has probably not been depleted as much as lands elsewhere along with abundant water supply which is all that is needed for surviving.

                      If a family of three living in Calgary realized where the civilization is headed and decides to take measures to survive could they pick up farming skills within a few years and be ready?

                      What are the irrigation options without electrical pumps? Does Canada have robust canal system? Is farming possible without fertilizers and pesticides (as the cold might stop the pests)? Without tractors and other machines what is the draft animal availability? Does the climate support multiple planting cycles?

                      Sorry about so many questions.

                      Liked by 1 person

                    2. Hi Kira,

                      That’s a lot of complicated questions that depend on many factors like your age, where you live, your skills, your financial means, etc..

                      I will think about writing a long essay with my opinions however if you want to narrow the question to something bite size I will try to answer it now.

                      Like

                    3. Hi Rob

                      I am commenting here as the limit for replies on this thread seems to have been reached.

                      Rob, here, I’ve copied this thread below to give space for replies.

                      Like

              2. Thanks for that detailed answer.

                The problem is that they take the opposite of your systems approach and start backwards by selecting the essentials like agriculture,sanitation or anything else they need and work their way to the end by choosing convenient components and hand waving the rest. I am familiar with this method as I used to do the same.

                Unless one has spent decades studying complex systems and mastered the whole interconnected systems approach it is easy to be stumped by the magical thinking approach and be at a loss for words.

                For instance my friends in Australia think their electricity is guaranteed as they have one of the largest coal reserves as for them the way to get electricity is to burn coal to rotate the turbines and just “transmit” the electricity to the power sockets at home. I used to think so too. Only now have I realised how much of stuff like sub stations and transformers are needed to get the energy to the homes and manufacturing them needs all of supply chain along with transportation powered by oil.

                The ‘what’s necessary’ and tracing that all the way to the end is a habit I have only recently begun to cultivate after watching you do the same. Are there any books that teach systems approach or complex systems analysis that could help?

                Liked by 1 person

                1. Kira,

                  I always find that Joseph Tainter’s book ‘The Collapse of Complex Societies’ combined with ‘Limits to growth’ and a basic understanding of entropy and dissipation is all any person needs to come to the correct conclusions, until the denial gene kicks in somewhere along the way, which happens to most people..

                  Liked by 1 person

                  1. Hi Hideaway,

                    Thanks for the recommendations. I am familiar with Tainter’s book and the LTG. My question was about systems approach in general to any topic at hand and not just civilization or collapse. What I mean is if I want to analyze an ecosystem and its complex interactions the tendency is to take a piecemeal approach as opposed to the systems approach. This seems to be a pitfall of modern education system with the specialization and super specialization leading to siloing. This seems to be the reason why so many people who are experts in their field seem unable to grasp the complexity of civilization and all its moving parts. We see this on Nates podcast all the time.

                    So I was wondering if there was a method to cultivate that mindset/skill where one could see all the moving parts and the various feedbacks and interactions between them. Or is it a philosophy of thinking to be cultivated organically.

                    Like

                    1. Maybe this is part of what you are looking for:

                      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thinking_In_Systems:_A_Primer.

                      So I was wondering if there was a method to cultivate that mindset/skill where one could see all the moving parts and the various feedbacks and interactions between them.

                      I have come to the conclusion that it is not possible to build a model of everything. A model is an abstraction. It will have a limited domain of applicability and aspects of reality over which it will fail miserably. I think we build models to answer specific questions. And it’s OK to have only partial models (slices of reality) to that end.

                      Like

                    2. Hi Charles,

                      Thanks for the recommendation.

                      I have come to the conclusion that it is not possible to build a model of everything. A model is an abstraction. It will have a limited domain of applicability and aspects of reality over which it will fail miserably. I think we build models to answer specific questions. 

                      I agree completely but I just wanted to overcome or at least combat this subconscious bias to fragment things into individual bits for analysis rather than taking a systems approach. I am often at a loss for reply when someone talks about electrifying mining trucks and powering it with solar panels. It takes me a while to formulate a response to such BS ideas. Hope this book helps in it.

                      Like

                    3. I agree completely but I just wanted to overcome or at least combat this subconscious bias to fragment things into individual bits for analysis rather than taking a systems approach.

                      Yes (I am replying here, because we reached the edge)

                      I believe it is not really possible to avoid fragmentation using language, the intellect, reasoning. Words are knives. System thinking is another form of fragmentation. Only, reality is cut differently.

                      To me (and I am not trying to convert here, just sharing), re-uniting (or rather noticing the ever-existing unity) is done at another level (before). A level which requires no effort whatsoever. Let the veil of thoughts down and see. It’s so simple, we can’t get it. “Here” is the only place we can’t travel to.

                      🙂

                      Like

  21. Dr. Tom Murphy argues there’s nothing special or better about the human brain, it’s just different.

    Feels like pleading to me by the brain that measured the distance to the moon to about a millimeter accuracy.

    https://dothemath.ucsd.edu/2025/02/the-great-escape/

    We dismiss other animals as dumb. Plants are even worse than dumb: mere vegetables! Because their ways of knowing aren’t cerebrally-based, our biased attitude is to discount them. A dumb moth is helplessly attracted to the porch light. A deer might stand transfixed in a road staring at an oncoming car’s headlights. While on lights, a sea turtle hatchling might mistake a streetlight for the moonlit ocean, and head the wrong way to its premature death. A bird might make its last flight straight into a window at full speed. A wide variety of animals fall victim to our traps: crabs, fish, mice, rabbits, and more. Not a single one is smart enough to use money or legally own property (though I’d call that genius). It’s easy to make fun when animals fail to “get with our program.”

    To a bat, it’s hilarious that you could walk face-first into a brick wall in the dark. How utterly dumb! To a penguin, it’s inconceivable that you’d be too dense to pick out your own child among a wailing crowd of thousands simply by their cries. To a fish, not only are you capable of drowning in water of almost any depth, but you are oblivious to electrical impulses from the movements of predatory fish around you. To a dog, the fact that you can’t smell your way home makes you a total bonehead. Birds note that you’re so directionally-challenged that you are prone to walking in circles in woods or a fog—ignorant of the magnetic field that pervades their awareness. To an amoeba, your lack of ability to perceive chemical gradients is unthinkably insane. To a tree, it’s clear you don’t know the first thing about when its safe this year to put out leaf buds, or how to negotiate the delicacies of nutrient exchange with a mycorrhizal network. These plants and animals know a boatload of tricks, about which we haven’t the foggiest clue. The proof is in the pudding.

    What’s real, lasting, and will cradle us into the future if we don’t thwart it are biophysical realities, ecological interrelationships vetted by evolution, and community at many levels—including family, locals, and the more-than-human world.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Was worried about my aging brain’s memory and being accused of exaggerating…

      Dr. Tom Murphy measured the distance to the moon. What was the accuracy of the measurement?

      Grok: Dr. Tom Murphy, a physicist at the University of California, San Diego, led the Apache Point Observatory Lunar Laser-ranging Operation (APOLLO) project, which aimed to measure the distance to the Moon with exceptional precision. His team used laser pulses bounced off retroreflectors placed on the lunar surface by Apollo missions to achieve an accuracy of about one millimeter. This level of precision comes from measuring the round-trip travel time of the laser pulses to within a few picoseconds, allowing for highly accurate calculations of the Earth-Moon distance. Over time, such measurements have helped refine our understanding of the Moon’s orbit, showing it to be approximately 384,399 kilometers on average, with the APOLLO project’s contribution pushing the instantaneous precision to this remarkable one-millimeter level.

      Like

    2. Nice simple comment from Joe Clarkson on this article on resilience.org. Why does this make so much sense to me but put it in front of others and they either go silent or start talking about solar panels from mushrooms?

      “The basic assumption presented here, that we need to use our brains differently, is wrong. The human brain has been roughly the same for 300,000 years and it’s only recently that this brain has enabled modernity and its depredations. Prior to the last several hundred years, our brains allowed us to live on the earth without destroying it, so what has changed?

      Fossil fuels. Modernity is not a product of the human brain alone, otherwise it would have appeared hundreds of thousands of years ago. It is only the combination of brainpower and lots of surplus exogenous energy that allowed modern industrial cultures to exist. Take away the energy from fossil fuels and humans are relatively harmless on a global scale. Sure, they can muck up local areas, but so can most other species.

      It’s not the brain or the way we use it that’s the problem, it’s the scale of the power made available by abundant energy supplies. We don’t need to change how our brains work, we just need to power down. Fortunately, that’s coming fairly soon, whether we want it or not.”

      Liked by 2 people

      1. I always like Joe’s comments… but I keep looking at this one and can’t stop from nitpicking.

        Take away the energy from fossil fuels and humans are relatively harmless on a global scale. Sure, they can muck up local areas, but so can most other species.

        I don’t agree, but I guess I can accept it. The problem is when I accept it, I start to lose focus. All of a sudden, it’s perfectly fine that one species busted through the resource constraints of fire & agriculture… seems like flawed logic. 

        It is only the combination of brainpower and lots of surplus exogenous energy that allowed modern industrial cultures to exist.

        Conquering fire is what created that combo of brainpower and lots of surplus exogenous energy.

        The Story of Life: The quest for profit and growth will continue as it has since the first organic cell fissioned. The End.

        As long as there’s a fire using species running around on the planet, the rest of life will always be in danger of that species eventually creating a future self-induced mass extinction. 

        ps. I give myself half credit for that last quote from James@megacancer because I found it buried in his comment section and then added the beginning and end to make it a complete story😊

        Liked by 2 people

  22. Recession incoming.

    First cut interest rates. Then panic and print. Then inflation. Then pissed off citizens and rising interest rates. Then war.

    I’ve argued this point before with HHH without satisfaction. I think the Fed doesn’t matter until the government wants to spend a lot more than the markets will lend it at a reasonable price. Then the Fed does make difference by causing inflation via QE.

    https://peakoilbarrel.com/open-thread-non-petroleum-feb-19-2025/#comment-786314

    HHH: Feds funds just inverted with the 10 year. In other words the overnight lending rate is above the 10 year bond. In other words there is no spread to pocket for banks.

    …interest rate cuts and QE or QT, or the amount of bank reserves doesn’t matter at all.

    They want you to believe that if they just get the correct amount of bank reserves and interest rate then everything will be ok.

    DOGE should just eliminate the Fed. It’s a total waste of money on the thousand or so PHD’s that work at the Central Bank.

    Regardless they will be cutting rates soon. Might even get an emergency rate cut. Not that it will matter but they’ll still do it.

    The FED has no real power. It just a confidence game. Since they are doing something. It means we are suppose to remain confident in the economy.

    Like

  23. Big deal at the UN today.

    US, China, and Russia voted for a motion about Ukraine that western rich countries voted against.

    I don’t recall that ever happening before.

    A lot of people I respect think Trump and team are faking real positive change.

    It looks genuine to me.

    I actually have a little hope for peace and justice being delivered to the bioweapons/covid criminals before everything goes to shit via economic collapse.

    Like

  24. Sarah Connor has a new one today. I enjoyed it, but I have no idea if this came from a human or a bot.
    Engineered Collapse of the Middle Class

    Main reason I’m commenting is because I got this link over there from Ali R. I saw this early in my journey thanks to Michael Dowd. Fun to watch again after more than three years have passed… I was a scared, unconfident rookie doomer back then, now I’m a professional maniac😊.

    Like

    1. Sorry, I should have at least said what the link is about. LOL.
      It’s a short story about how even the rich aren’t going to be immune from collapse.

      Like

    2. Thanks, I’ve never seen that video.

      I keep a decent cache of vodka. Plan to add some cartons of cigarettes if I can figure out how to buy them tax free from the native reservation here. If things get really bad I’m going to have a serious party and watch a bunch of my favorite movies before saying goodbye.

      Like

      1. LOL. Thats my kind of exit strategy… I might have to copycat it.

        But they’d have to be very very carefully selected movies. Films like Independence Day or Armageddon would probably talk me out of going through with it.😊

        Liked by 1 person

  25. Art Berman criticizes Peter Turchin for being energy blind.

    Then Berman explains what’s going on in the world.

    https://www.artberman.com/blog/the-great-game-reborn-energy-geopolitics-and-the-reversal-of-the-liberal-order/

    The Great Game Reborn

    The Great Game once defined the 19th-century struggle between the British and Russian Empires for control of Central Asia. Today, it’s a global contest for power, resources, and strategic influence—this time between the U.S., China, Russia, and other rising players. The game has returned, but the rules have changed.

    Trump understands what many still ignore—energy is power. Unlike his predecessors, he sees energy dominance as the foundation of economic strength and global influence. His vision isn’t just about oil—it’s about securing all U.S. energy resources: oil, gas, coal, nuclear, pipelines, refineries, AI. His push for Greenland, Panama, Canada, and Gaza isn’t random; it’s about territory as energy leverage, a strategic play for control in a world where power will be dictated by resource access.

    Tariffs and energy control mark a zero-sum shift—an unspoken acknowledgment that the age of perpetual growth is over, and the great powers are now fighting over what remains. If that’s reality, then those still operating under the liberal order playbook—like much of Europe—are playing a losing hand.

    The U.S., China, and Russia already understand the new reality—because it’s not new at all. The world is reverting to the old game: mercantilism, spheres of influence, and economic warfare. This was how global powers operated before World War II reset the board, and now, the reset is reversing.

    The modern Great Game is being fought through economic statecraft. The U.S. is weaponizing trade—blocking Chinese investments, imposing tariffs, and restructuring supply chains. Europe faces NATO uncertainty, rising defense costs, and the need for strategic autonomy. Globalization is fading, replaced by neo-imperialism and resource-driven power politics.

    The stakes are high. The game is accelerating. And the future belongs to those who understand that the rules have changed.

    Liked by 1 person

  26. Dr. Tim Morgan is flailing around (again) today trying to make sense of material and energy blindness, because he’s not aware of Varki’s MORT theory.

    His concluding comment on the failure of Apple’s $189 billion investment in technology is hilarious. I used to have a senior position in that industry. I can confirm that’s a LOT of money to spend on R&D to achieve nothing.

    Whilst we cannot state that some kind of economic or social “collapse” is inevitable, we can say that two of the biggest looming shocks to the system are the failure of money and the failure of technology. The sheer scale of interconnectedness between the monetary and the technological suggests that these failures might be simultaneous (or near-simultaneous) events.

    At no time has the promise of ‘infinite exponential economic growth on a finite planet’ made sense. First, there are some commodities for which no substitute exists. Second, no amount of monetary incentive can call forth resources that do not exist in nature.

    These observations are borne out by monetarily-annotated data. Since 2002, reported global real GDP has grown by 113%, or $103 trillion. Over that same period, though, debt has grown by $280tn, or 190%, in real terms, whilst we can estimate that broader liabilities – including those of the NBFI (non-bank financial intermediary or “shadow banking”) system – have increased by about $825tn, or 230%.

    Most important of all, orthodox economics has no material point of reference, with everything valued only in terms of how much money somebody is prepared to spend on it.

    On this basis, the combined output of farming and fisheries accounts for only 6% of global GDP. This implies that these industries are not particularly important, and that 94% of the world economy could continue happily, even if we entirely lost the ability to produce food.

    Imperial Japan was pushed into the Pearl Harbor gamble by an American embargo on petroleum exports, and the rapid seizure of oil fields in the Dutch East Indies proved not to be a sufficient remedy.

    Starved of fuel, the Luftwaffe’s advanced fighter aircraft and skilled pilots sat impotently on the ground as the vapour trails of Allied bombers were writing the defeat of the Axis in the skies over Germany.

    If, though, German and Italian forces had seized Malta, they might have supplied the Afrika Korps with resources sufficient to seize control of the oil fields of the Near East. As Winston Churchill so memorably put it, Malta was the “hinge of fate” in the European war. Had Operation PEDESTAL not succeeded in shepherding the desperately damaged tanker OHIO through to Valetta, that hinge might well have turned in the opposite direction.

    In short, one doesn’t need to have been an oil sector analyst – or experienced the traumas of the 1970s, coped with electricity disruption, faced the bracing winds on a North Sea platform or visited an oil refinery – to know that the economy is, overwhelmingly, an energy rather than a monetary system.

    Why, then, has classical economics got this so wrong?

    Perhaps the last word should be left to the analyst who, reflecting on the $189bn invested in research and development by Apple over the past decade, told the BBC that “[a]ll we have to show for that is the HomePod and $3,500 ski goggles”.

    This is not intended here as any reflection on Apple in particular. It’s a reference, rather, to a law of diminishing returns already writ large in the invalidation of the preferred capital-intensive business model for the development of artificial intelligence.

    It didn’t need the advent and instant popularity of DeepSeek to tell the materially-aware observer that this business model couldn’t conceivably deliver sufficient returns on the vast investment of energy and raw materials that this model required.

    The failures of money and technology are likely to come as even bigger shocks to the system than the revolution now unfolding in Washington. These are shocks that, to the energy-conscious observer, are already hard-wired into the arc.

    Liked by 1 person

  27. Ed Conway debunks Trump’s claim that he’ll recover $500 billion via rare earth’s from Ukraine.

    Oddly, Conway ignores what I think is the most important point, Russia has already taken most of the territory that has rare earth deposits.

    There must be a different story behind the public story.

    Like

  28. Good essay today by el gato malo on how the overton window has shifted and how much further it has to go.

    A lot of people need to go to prison.

    https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/move-overton

    the world woke up and the folks who wanted to just proclaim “mistakes were made, let’s let bygones be bygones and forget the whole thing” are not getting much in the way of traction.

    sure, lots of people want to forget, but a lot of people want to remember too.

    and this is not going away.

    and there is quite a lot of overton left to move.

    people now mostly know the virus came from a lab.

    • they do not realize that NIH paid for it.
    • they do not know that the mRNA “vaccines” used NIH technology and that NIH staffers were paid direct royalties that they had no requirement to disclose.
    • the fact that the drugs that were shipped were not the same ones in the trials is not known by most.
    • the fact that “long covid” is mostly vaccine injury is not known by most
    • most still think “the vaccine helped” and are in for a nasty rugpull as the facts emerge

    this is all coming soon.

    the panic is starting.

    “The Covid-19 vaccines were powerfully protective, preventing millions of deaths.”

    this is going to be the fairy tale the politicians and media leaders who pushed the mRNA “vaxx” will need to keep telling themselves.

    it worked. it saved lives.

    it didn’t. it killed people wholesale and made a pandemic worse. it bent curves the wrong way and was associated with persistent upticks in all cause mortality all over the world and all cause death was higher in the vaxxed.

    actual covid deaths rose post vaccine.

    they are going to keep telling this lie because they have to. they have to not because they’re being paid or forced (though perhaps they are) but rather because if they admitted the truth, it would end them.

    “imagine you shilled for a dodgy drug that caused megadeaths.

    could you handle that about yourself?

    you’re pol pot. you’re jim jones.

    how you feeling?

    not so good, huh?

    this is probably too much for most of these people to psychically bear.

    they will deny it until something breaks.

    but when it breaks, they will need someone to blame apart from themselves. it will be a matter of self preservation.

    my guess: it jumps to the pharma cos and executives.

    “we wuz lied to! we’re victims too!”

    it’s just the low energy path.

    Like

      1. I find Martenson to be a Jekyll & Hyde.

        On topics in his wheelhouse that he cares about like overshoot or covid, he can be excellent, especially when speaking with knowledgeable peers.

        When he’s in subscription sales mode discussing click bait topics like the evils of bankers he is cringeworthy bad.

        Liked by 1 person

  29. Trump Shares DERANGED, Sick Gaza Video

    Frankly, that video is so morbid and over-the-top that it is almost comical. It basically depicts a theme park built over a mass grave. I just thought to myself “Is our president really this deranged and delusional”?

    Like

    1. I will bet you a can of sardines that this is a tactic by Trump to scare the Arab countries into paying for rebuilding Gaza for the Palestinians, or finding a nice new home for them. We should pay attention to what actually happens, not the words being said.

      Like

    2. Everything is a plan within a plan. Most of what we are told is not what is going on. You need to think levels deeper than you are. Start with this, assume that DJT is hyper intelligent (I know it doesn’t seem that way but) how is he trying to trick or manipulate his target with what he presents. We should apply this to all people in power.

      Like

      1. Good advice. I personally think Trump is no genius but he’s street smart and he’s surrounded himself with a really smart team. Biden was surrounded by morons.

        What I see is that the genocide stopped and the supplies started flowing into Gaza as soon as Biden lost power.

        This may change for the worse, but so far Trump’s been a lot better for the Palestinians.

        Like

  30. A plausible explanation for the insane behavior of the UK regarding Ukraine, and the strange insistence by Trump that Ukraine give the US minerals it probably does not have.

    UK is broke and needs collateral to refloat its banks. Apparently UK already has a mineral deal with Ukraine and plans to use this as collateral. Trump knows about this deal and just blew it up, maybe as payback for UK orchestrating the whole debacle including convincing Ukraine to walk away from the Istanbul agreement which would have maintained Ukraine’s territory rather than the path they are on now of losing everything.

    Like

  31. I don’t know if I’d go as far as peak oil spiritual leader of the world Andril Zvorygin, but this is a good example of how bad Canadian leaders are. They are literally morons.

    Like

  32. Already 90F/32C out here in the desert. February for fu#k’s sake. Should be 70F. This is more in line with how I think climate change will work. Not so much 130F world record hot days, but a bunch of days/nights where its 20+ degrees above the norm.

    Liked by 3 people

  33. I hate the way products are deliberately made hard to repair these days. I bought a very good quality battery operated bluetooth speaker 10 years ago for $150 and used it every day. It’s operating time recently became very short and I concluded its battery needed to be replaced. Being a good prepper I have spare 18650 batteries so I decided to attempt a repair.

    The screws used to secure the case require a rare 5 star torx security bit with center hole. Nobody in town stocks it. So I ordered bits from AliExpress for $6, waited 2 months, and got a refund because my shipment was lost. Then I ordered bits from Amazon for $12 which arrived in a few days. I got the case apart to discover the battery was spot welded to a small charging circuit board making it very difficult to replace. I broke off the spot welds and attempted to solder directly to a new battery trying not to heat the battery too much so it did not explode on me. I was unable to make a good connection, gave up, and discarded the speaker.

    All of this could have been avoided had the manufacturer simply used common screws and installed the battery with a clip. The speaker would have worked fine for another 50 years. Now it’s in a landfill plus I burned a lot of carbon buying tools needed to repair it that I will never use again.

    Liked by 4 people

    1. I’ve had a very similar experience, including having to buy a new screwdriver, while repairing a bluetooth speaker (old batteries and knackered charging port). I did manage to repair the thing, after much faffing. Contrast to, I have some bedsheets from my wife’s great grandmother; they are over a century old, and still in good condition (some repairs, some stains, but nothing I’m not happy to sleep on).

      Simon.

      Liked by 3 people

      1. Yes, I love durable well designed things. One of my favorites are lowly plain white Corelle dishes. The design and color has been unchanged for 55 years. You can buy replacements or add to your collection from many local stores. The technology is unique and the manufacturing plant involves huge capital, machines, and energy that will not be possible in a post collapse world. That’s ok because the dishes never break and are super hard so show very little wear after years of daily use. They are thin, light weight, and stack efficiently making them perfect for small kitchens. Corelle sells plastic lids so the same bowl can be used to refrigerate/freeze food, heat it in the microwave, and eat from it.

        Liked by 1 person

        1. I’d never heard of those dishes, as they seem to be an American thing. Shame, they look nice. Here’s a video I found about their manufacture. Agreed that it’s hard to imagine such a capital-intensive process being around in a post fossil fuel world.

          Like

          1. I love that video and have watched it several times over the years. It’s a great example of what it takes to make some of the products we take for granted. I smile and am grateful every time I look at my collection of dishes.

            What’s not shown in the video is that the plain white pattern has a huge selection of shapes and sizes of dishes. I’ll bet it’s the largest selection of any pattern from any manufacturer.

            Like

  34. Regarding whether Trump is playing to the crowd or actually trying to make a difference (I too think the latter), the Epstein release will be a good indication, I think.

    “Alina Habba says she just met with Kash Patel and Pam Bondi, and DOES expect the “Epstein List” to come out today, describing it as “shocking”

    Habba says she “absolutely” expects criminal charges to come as a result.”

    https://xcancel.com/_/status/1895166339804762295

    here’s to some (lots) of arrests.

    Simon.

    Like

    1. I’m seeing some people who made a living for years by opposing the policies of the US government losing their minds over Trump. They are certain Trump is just as evil and are freaking out because they are losing subscribers who disagree. Beliefs are often determined by how someone makes a living. Examples include Canadian Prepper, Brian Berletic, J.J. Couey, and Larry Wilkerson.

      Like

        1. Time will tell my friend. I think we are all traveling blind right now. But take solace in knowing that as individuals we can’t change things on the bigger playing field, we just don’t have any influence. So sit back and watch and try to see the game for that is what it is. I feel your discontent too.

          Like

      1. I was really surprised by Larry Wilkerson. He has been one of the most astute people on war that I follow and now he thinks Trump (Hegseth) is making the military into a white supremist evangelical coup (by Trump) supporting crowd. He is going down the same rabbit hole as Chris Hedges who sees Trump as an out and out Fascist. I don’t get that feeling from Trump – but I could be WRONG.

        I don’t think Trump is intelligent or thinks outside his 1st grade bully mentality, he is just a semi smart narcissistic sociopath (like a lot of CEO’s).

        AJ

        Like

  35. FYI for anyone here that suffers from wheat intolerance. Dr. Bret Weinstein has had severe wheat intolerance since he was damaged a couple decades ago by a flu vaccine. He’s in Europe and is running an experiment with European wheat. So far he’s had no reaction and is enjoying bread for the first time in a long time.

    Liked by 1 person

        1. Yes I know people that had eaten seafood at the time of a vaccine injection and then developed an allergic reaction to seafood for the rest of their lives (so far).

          Like

          1. Adjuvants are deliberately toxic to irritate and wake up the immune system to build defenses against the target foreign protein in the vaccine. If there happen to be other foreign proteins present, like say wheat or seafood or peanuts, then you can end up with a lifetime allergy to that food. There was no such thing as peanut allergies or gluten intolerance when I was a kid.

            Liked by 1 person

  36. ‘1.7 million’ Palestinians in Gaza? Trump’s statement raises questions about death toll
    https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/trump-gaza-population-relocation-1.7457559

    President Donald Trump’s assertion that the U.S. can relocate “1.7 or 1.8 million” Palestinians has raised questions about the death toll in Gaza.

    Trump made the comments last week while announcing a surprise plan to take over the region, which has been devastated by the Israel-Hamas war that began in October 2023.

    Gaza’s population was estimated at over 2.2 million before the war, and the Gaza Health Ministry’s official death count sits at 48,297.

    Devi Sridhar, chair of global public health at the University of Edinburgh, says she found Trump’s numbers “puzzling” — and a potential confirmation that the death toll is actually much higher, something researchers, doctors and public health experts have long said was the case.

    On multiple occasions, Trump has referred to the population of Gaza as being 1.7-1.8 million. Is he mistaken or does his administration have intelligence suggesting that over 400,000 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza?

    Like

    1. Just having a few drinks and feeling it now.

      I would just like to say that it would be nice to be sitting around a camp fire with all of you chatting and feeling an analog closeness instead of a digital connection but it is what it is. So cheers all and thank you for the constant comments and this community.

      Liked by 4 people

    1. I know this is taken out of context but Zelensky is collapse aware, ‘his’ country is literally being carved up in various methods by Russia and now the US. His commentary between 0:50 and 1:00 is prophetic of what is to come. ‘You (USA) don’t feel it now as you have nice big ocean but you will feel it in the future.

      Like

    2. https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/trump-meets-zelensky-says-minerals-deal-be-signed-today-will-use-ukraine-rare-earths

      • Spanish PM Sanchez says “Ukraine, Spain stands with you.”
      • French Foreign Minister Barrot says Putin’s Russia is the aggressor, there is one necessity: Europe, now the time for words is over, time for action.
      • German Chancellor Scholz says Ukraine can rely on Germany and Europe.
      • EU’s von der Leyen says “be strong, be brave, be fearless, you are never alone, Dear President Zelensky”
      • Lithuanian President says Ukraine will never be alone.
      • Portuguese PM says Ukraine can count on us to support it
      • Czech Republic President says “We stand with Ukraine more than ever. Time for Europe to step up its efforts.”
      • EU foreign policy chief Kallas says “Today, it became clear that the free world needs a new leader. It’s up to US, Europeans, to take this challenge.”
      • Polish PM Tusk posts on X, “Dear Zelensky, dear Ukrainian friends, you are not alone”.
      • French President Macron says Russia is the aggressor, and Ukraine is the aggressed people. We were all right to help Ukraine and sanction Russia 3 years ago, and to continue to do so.
      • Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said “Trump and Vance are doing Putin’s dirty work.”

      Like

Leave a reply to Rob Mielcarski Cancel reply