I haven’t had time to write a new essay, and I wanted a new post so newcomers don’t assume un-Denial.com has shifted its focus to Covid, which is a confusing space populated by crazy people assigning complex global conspiracies to a bunch of incompetent and sometimes corrupt leaders.
Thank you to reader Frank White for providing a good reason for a quick post with a new video by Neil Halloran on climate change.
It’s my first exposure to Halloran and I’m really impressed. He targets people that are skeptical of climate change and does an amazing job of leading them to conclude we are in serious trouble and must act.
I left this comment on his YouTube channel:
Brilliant content and production! This is best video I’ve seen for persuading climate change skeptics that we are in serious trouble. Thank you.
Your next step should be to address the human genetic tendency to deny unpleasant realities.
I bought some more Ivermectin from the local feed & tack shop today. Looks like the word is getting out. I got the last tubes of the product suitable for humans. They had lots of other types with additives that you do not want to take.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Every once in a while Peter Watts writes a really good rant. Today he demolished the catholic church, which is the worst of many bad religions.
https://www.rifters.com/crawl/?p=9941
LikeLiked by 1 person
Tonight I watched the new BBC documentary “Building Britain’s Biggest Nuclear Power Station”.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m000wnn4
What stood out for me:
1) They’re spending a gazillion dollars to make it safe from every imaginable threat except the threat that is near certain: insufficient diesel, surplus wealth, and the complex supply chains necessary to maintain it.
2) The quantity of carbon via concrete, diesel, and steel to build this zero carbon power source is staggering. There must be some denial in the math.
3) If it opens on schedule and within budget I will recant my disbelief in God.
4) They claim that private financing shields the UK tax payer from cost overruns. I’m betting the shield melts down.
LikeLiked by 3 people
If you enjoy non-fiction history audiobooks you will love Dan Carlin’s Hardcore History podcast. I’ve listened to every one of his 67 episodes.
His latest episode focuses on the harsh fighting and nuclear bombings that ended WWII in the Pacific.
I’m very fortunate not to have been a young man during that period. So much of our good fortune is luck.
https://www.dancarlin.com/product/hardcore-history-67-supernova-in-the-east-vi/
LikeLike
Not “so much”. Everything depends on luck. Your set of genes, your family environment, country you were born in, time you were born…
LikeLiked by 1 person
The megacancer.com blog run by James has been down for several weeks… Usually, it’s because he neglects to pay his ISP bill. Maybe he’s on a long vacation. I suppose we won’t know unless or until he resurfaces.
LikeLike
Several weeks is unusually long. Maybe he’s quit like so many other overshoot aware writers.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Some random observation. Our local BirdLife organization did a tour where you go watch birds in a group and there I had the time to talk to our guide who is a distinguished (retired) veterinarian and honorary head of said association. It struck me how much sense MORT made to him.
I guess ecology is a good foundation for shedding the illusion of human exceptionalism. My selection is obviously biased but many people who I introduced to MORT who weren’t immediately defensive where of that type.
LikeLike
Thanks for letting me know. I don’t think I’ve encountered a single person in real life, including friends and family members, that has seen merit in MORT.
LikeLike
Have you considered imprisoning them in the basement until they see the light? Feed them old twinkies and expired prepper rations…they’d be like “yes, I was so blind…but it all makes sense now!”
LikeLiked by 2 people
Lots of smart people think something is broken in the banking system. Steven Van Metre here tries to explain what’s going on and why the Fed is trapped between a rock and a hard place.
I don’t understand his explanation. The system is too byzantine for my brain to grok.
What I do understand is that you cannot grow debt faster than the economy forever, and I understand that when debt is used to speculate on rising asset prices you create a bubble that must pop.
Steve predicts a stock market crash and I agree, even though his reasoning differs from mine.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Long story short in my view:
Fed activities are contracting financial conditions for banks, contracting their lending and putting downward pressure on yields. His prediction is that this will put downward pressure on stock prices. I’m not sure about that part – he did not explain it. I would have thought lower bond yields would increase stock prices because high valuations imply low yields. Worth a quick read: https://www.business-standard.com/article/markets/explained-how-bond-yields-impact-stock-market-what-should-investors-do-121022600179_1.html
It would be worth asking him “Why do you think downward pressure on bond rates puts negative pressure on stock prices?”
Sometimes folks casually misspeak about prices vs. rates vs. yield in the bond world. They also misspeak about stock prices vs valuations vs returns.
But his thinking is that a selloff in stocks will lead to margin calls, create a need to raise cash, disrupt the money markets, and cause an exponential need for more QE, creating a death spiral.
My opinion is that as real returns from stocks approach zero, and bond rates approach zero, and companies become zombies, the banking system will struggle with the fact that there is no underlying collateral of any real value to take risks on. i.e. collateral becomes worthless as the system winds down.
LikeLike
Thanks.
I believe Steve thinks bond prices will increase and stocks prices will fall because he thinks the real economy is weak and contracting due to its debt burden (he is not energy or overshoot aware).
His logic is that as the economy contracts, interest rates must go down, which will cause bond prices to increase, and investors will shift from stocks to more promising bonds thus causing stock prices to fall.
LikeLike
This is what I don’t understand: Why would increasing bond prices (lower rates) trigger a selloff in stocks? I would think it would lead to more risk taking. Unless large numbers of stock investors conclude that rates are lower for longer they are not going to selloff stocks for bonds.
Current bondholders would benefit from the higher prices, but that doesn’t mean anybody would be interested in newly printed on-the-run treasuries.
My prediction had been that if mid-term bond rates rise to compete with the average S&P Dividend would be the tipping point. That’s about 1.6%
I agree with what he says: Stock selloff into a no-bid market (high leverage, low short interest) leading to margin calls and money market problems. I just am missing this connection. Hmmm….will have to watch again!
LikeLike
My summary of Steve’s beliefs was not gleaned from that specific video but rather from watching him for many months.
I think he has the classic investment advisor view that bond and stock prices are inversely correlated. In an energy constrained no growth world that old model probably no longer applies. But he’s not energy aware. He does seem to have fresh insights into the consequences of Fed printing. He thinks printing constrains rather than stimulates the economy.
LikeLike
Today’s episode from Steve:
LikeLike
I’ve been thinking about what the end game might look like. My hunch is that there will be very little to buy, regardless of how much money a person has.
Gail Tverberg today provided some ideas on how this might play out.
https://ourfiniteworld.com/2021/05/27/dont-expect-the-world-economy-to-resume-its-prior-growth-pattern-after-covid-19/comment-page-11/#comment-299249
LikeLike
I posted my thoughts on “the end” at surplus today. Dr. Tim asked “Why won’t share prices go down?”
@Dr. Tim – “Why haven’t their share prices slumped?”
I think the answer is one of the ironies of thinking in terms of valuations as compared to thinking in terms of prices. Higher valuations imply lower long term returns. So as real global returns approach zero I’d not be surprised to see prices approach infinity.
This relates to thinking of money as claims or promises.
The economy can coast in denial, believing future goods and services will exist to satisfy expanding claims to infinity until such point at which real goods and services are not available in the present. This same point coincides with the realization that money is essentially worthless in the future.
I think political decisions will determine whether it ends in a whisper or a bang. I’m personally predicting first the former, then the latter, due mainly to ignorance and social collapse preventing cooperation.
I think surplus energy reaches terminality when there is nothing to produce which is worth more than the cost of the inputs of production. To land, labor and capital we have to add energy. Labor can be shorted a long time in the face of increasing energy costs, but eventually either (a) labor will accept austerity willingly, (b) be forced to accept austerity, or (c) collapse the system through political action which could look like voting for doomed policies, or rebellion – both with the misguided notion of better tomorrows.
LikeLike
Interesting insights, thanks.
Here is the source discussion:
https://surplusenergyeconomics.wordpress.com/2021/06/07/202-the-shape-of-things-to-come/#comment-25421
Your argument makes perfect sense to me when applied to our collective confidence in the monetary system.
I’m not sure I agree that confidence that claims will be filled in the future justifies higher stock prices. I could see confidence being an explanation for stock prices remaining stable while returns drop and thus valuations increase. But for prices to rise as returns fall I think you need a classic debt fueled asset bubble. Which always pops. Please tell me why I’m wrong if I’m missing something.
I like and agree with your energy dependency summary. I explain it as follows:
LikeLike
Hi Rob – I think it is a bubble and do think it will pop. But it’s not a traditional bubble – It’s actually much worse. Sorry if I was obtuse. The valuation similarity is ironic to me, not claiming it’s actually causal.
There are at least two different types of “justification” in the same way there are at least two ways of looking at security values.
A stock can be priced at the discounted present value of a future stream of cash flows (in dividends). But most people think and invest in terms of price change, irrespective of traditional valuation (i.e. momentum, or price increase). Even brokers wind up talking in terms of % increase of the market cap or index. But if earnings don’t increase the price isn’t “justified” by valuations, only by speculation, or put more nicely “price movement.”
These can be looked at as two components of price
So the price could be
Pm=Pv+Ps
Pm = Market price
Pv = Price based on cash flow valuation
Ps = Price based on speculation
A traditional bubble happens when Ps becomes much larger than Pv. And the bubble pops when Pm backs down to Pv, or dips below.
I say our situation is much worse because even bears like Hussman (https://www.hussmanfunds.com/comment/mc210315/) expect that Pv (based on earnings/profits) is going to continue at historical trends. You and I probably both expect CocaCola is not going to have the same revenue, earnings or profit 20 years from now. But the “floor” markets expect in corrections is that firms will continue increasing revenues, earnings or profits into the future based on historical trends.
The markets aren’t over-valued, they are actually worthless, in that they are not going to deliver the stream of cash-flow which even a very conservative valuation would predict.
We could have another leg down first (Ps correction). That bubble will pop when people are convinced it isn’t growing anymore. The bigger bubble will pop when it is clear that, broadly speaking, most all companies will no longer be able to repay investors with future cash flows. In the same way I think hyperinflation will happen when people are convinced there won’t be more goods and services available in the future. They will only be convinced of that when it happens in the present, I believe.
LikeLike
I should have added: And corporations won’t be able to pay shareholders when it is no longer possible to produce anything which can be sold for a price above the cost of inputs.
LikeLike
Got it. Thanks. I understand and agree with you.
The permanent end of growth changes everything. I suppose that’s why the majority so aggressively deny energy constraints, including many intellectuals like physicists that should know better.
Our complete radio silence on energy depletion fascinates me to no end. It’s the most important force in play for the thing everyone cares the most about (wealth) and nobody discusses it except a few fringe blogs.
LikeLike
Roger you made my day.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I closed my Facebook account 2 years ago and have no regrets.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great indeed 🙂 .
I closed my FB account around 2011, two or three years after I opened it.
I was not even doomer at this time (at least I was not full-scale doomer), just the stupidity and emptiness of it as a whole disguised me already then.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Finally, a conspiracy theory that makes sense.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hell yes! These folks nailed it down fucking tight here. Perfectly on point regarding gain of function research.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Total sense. I like the WMD 2.0 comparison. Possibly bigger than that. At least only (primarily) Americans were bamboozled by WMD1.0. I think it will take international pressure for this to crack. I wonder if other EU nations might just push this who are less invested in the coverup than U.S?
LikeLiked by 2 people
LikeLike
Rob,
This was new to me. “The Importance of Understanding the Nonspecific Effects of Vaccines.”
https://quillette.com/2021/06/09/the-importance-of-understanding-the-nonspecific-effects-of-vaccines/
Exerpt: “Aaby was taken aback by what occurred following mass vaccination against measles: the rate of all-cause mortality among the children dropped by far more than could be explained by the measles decline alone. Children were not only not dying from measles, but they weren’t succumbing to a number of other diseases either. In an interview at the 2019 European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Disease (ECCMID), Aaby pointed out that measles epidemiological models predict a mortality decline of 15 percent in the first 12 months. Instead, Aaby witnessed a reduction in all-cause mortality in children of more than 50 percent. Aaby had stumbled upon the NSE of a vaccine. This discovery prompted the creation of the Bandim Health Project (BHP), a health and demographic surveillance system.”
LikeLike
Interesting, thanks.
A lot of humility and a lot of testing should be prerequisites for any modifications we make to a hyper complex system that we don’t understand.
Thank you to the billions of people that volunteered to test the vaccines for the billions of us waiting to review the test results.
LikeLike
My wife and I (both 72 plus) got the first dose very next day it was started and the second dose after 21 days. Since we work in a hospital, though not interacting directly with patients, we are required to take the shot and we also wanted to play safe. We had only mild reaction. It may be due to our health and physical conditioning. One may argue that a healthy person will tolerate the vaccine but also is not likely to be infected. On the other hand, an obese person with high blood pressure and sugar level will have adverse effects from the vaccine, but also face higher probability of catching the virus.
Whatever the origin of the disease and whoever makes billions of dollars, as a scientist I admire the science behind the development of the vaccine in a short time .
LikeLike
Yes, the technology and speed of bringing these complex vaccine products to market was very impressive.
I used to manage the design of complex computer hardware and software products and so have some insight into the challenges of developing products destined for high volume manufacturing. Despite best efforts we never launched a new product that did not have defects that needed to be corrected.
LikeLike
What’s your view of the long term studies on auto-immune disorders developing due to the covid vaccines?
What is your view on the long term studies of the effects on the female reproduction system and full term pregnancies?
Oh yeah there are none.
Which side of the debate within MIT are you on that the mRNA could potentially be reverse transcribed into DNA making insertions into our DNA. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33330870/
Looking forward to results, we’ll talk in five years.
Rob, you may find this interesting.
https://www.aestheticsadvisor.com/2021/05/steve-kirsch-NIH-WHO-covid-treatment.html
LikeLike
Thank you. Momentum seems to be building for low cost effective prevention and treatment.
I’m curious how long the WHO and NIH resist and how they try to save face when they fold.
Our “leaders” that accept WHO/NIH recommendations are a disgraceful bunch of unthinking ass covering administrators.
LikeLike
Well aren’t you generous in your summation of our leaders.
Maybe you meant a disgusting bunch of ass stinking cowering administrators.
LikeLike
In my world, calling someone an administrator that pretends to be a leader is the harshest insult we can make.
LikeLike
BBC Horizon is almost always good. They just produced a new documentary on the inside story of developing the vaccine.
Rips are up at the usual torrent sites.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m000x2tf
LikeLike
LikeLike
Today’s interview of Chris Martenson by James Howard Kunstler was a pretty good big picture review of what’s going on the world. Kunstler tried to draw Martenson into his favorite partisan conspiracies but Martenson did a good job of staying on the high unbiased ground.
I respect Martenson very much but I observe that his need for paying subscribers still makes it difficult to discuss unpopular topics like energy depletion, climate change, and the need for population reduction. It seems to be ok to discuss depleting aquifers and a doomed currency but not ok to discuss a permanently contracting economy and food supply due to diesel depletion.
https://kunstler.com/podcast/kunstlercast-345-jawing-about-covid-19n-stuff-with-chris-martenson/
LikeLike
Thanks Rob,
I generally avoid most everything that Kunstler does now days as it is soooo partisan. But with your review I listened to the podcast and it was generally good. Your take on Martenson’s need to keep paying “members” is spot on. No discussion of population driving all of our overshoot.
Thanks,
AJ
LikeLiked by 1 person
I take part of it back. Martenson is occasionally willing to discuss peak oil, but if you pay attention to the quivers in his voice and the soothing qualifiers like “don’t worry, there’s plenty left after peak oil” you can see he is not comfortable. No mention of not being able to feed 8 billion without diesel for tractors, combines, and trucks, or natural gas for fertilizer.
We need more adults discussing reality.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I remember a joke about a thrifty cold Polack that unraveled the wool from one end of his blanket so he could lengthen the other end of his blanket.
https://wolfstreet.com/2021/06/17/holy-moly-feds-reverse-repos-spike-to-756-billion-undoing-6-months-of-qe-in-opposite-direction-feds-qe-pushes-assets-past-8-trillion/
LikeLike
LikeLike
Apparently China has decided its recent loosening to a 3-child policy is not enough to keep their Ponzi scheme going so they’ve decided to remove all restrictions on family size.
Lawyers must be replacing the engineers they used to have in their leadership positions.
LikeLike
And economists.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sabine Hossenfelder jumped the shark today with an optimistic review of how to get rich by mining asteroids.
She takes a deep dive into all the issues except the only issue that matters: how will space adventures be possible without plentiful affordable fossil energy?
A brilliant PhD physicist who ignores thermodynamics and limits to growth can only be explained with Varki’s MORT.
LikeLike
Ugo Bardi (geologist) said something about asteroid mining recently (I can’t seem to find it). To paraphrase him(and probably badly) – only one a biologically and tectoniclly (sp?) active planet are minerals concentrated enough to make them economically viable to mine. Forget asteroids – SciFi delirium.
AJ
LikeLiked by 2 people
Better than I feared – as a long time admirer of the Hossenfelder. Decades to achieve-when all we have is -well who knows? I think she has children which naturally just accentuates the optimism bias in those lacking the un-denial gene.
LikeLike
Panopticon today with a worldwide summary of heat waves and drought:
https://climateandeconomy.com/2021/06/18/18th-june-2021-todays-round-up-of-climate-news/
Here at home on Vancouver Island my government weather service posted this alert today:
I don’t remember these hot spells as a kid here.
LikeLike
LikeLiked by 2 people
LikeLike
https://research.noaa.gov/article/ArtMID/587/ArticleID/2764/Coronavirus-response-barely-slows-rising-carbon-dioxide
LikeLike
George Mobus, a long time overshoot aware blogger, says goodbye. His archive will be available for a short period if you want to download anything.
https://questioneverything.typepad.com/question_everything/2021/06/happy-summer-solstice-goodbye-and-thanks-for-all-the-fish.html
LikeLike
Another one bites the dust. I think it was his March 2019 blog when he finally held his hands up
Well he tried mightily but here we are. Hopefully James at Megacancer hasn’t gone permanently hors de combat as well.
LikeLiked by 2 people
It’s kind of sad watching people like Mac10 flail around and make up stories to explain the insanity because they don’t understand Varki’s MORT, thermodynamics, or overshoot.
https://zensecondlife.blogspot.com/2021/06/there-is-no-safe-space-from-reality.html
LikeLike
Ha! He made the same point I did a few days ago: “Today these record low rates are considered an opportunity to ignore valuations and bid asset values to infinity. The value of a perpetuity over 0% is theoretically infinite according to Finance 101. Unfortunately, in the real world there is no such thing as a perpetuity. When the cycle ends, the cash flow on insolvent assets turns negative. The value of an insolvent asset at the end of the cycle is ZERO.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good for a chuckle…
LikeLiked by 2 people
https://energybulletin.org/the-energy-bulletin-weekly-21-june-2021/
LikeLike
Good (and rare) thread on over population at OFW…
https://ourfiniteworld.com/2021/06/18/how-energy-transition-models-go-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-300252
LikeLiked by 1 person
To actually answer John R.’s question, yes, I would think that the higher power would have exerted more of an effort on changing world governments’ attitudes on human breeding. Meadows made a beautiful effort, and any god worth its weight would have arranged human affairs differently in order to enhance his influence. I mean, after all, it is supposedly all-powerful, according to the myth.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Amen!
Meadows is a great man and my hero.
LikeLike
New paper from Bossche…
https://www.geertvandenbossche.org/post/why-the-ongoing-mass-vaccination-experiment-drives-a-rapid-evolutionary-response-of-sars-cov-2
LikeLike
Hi Rob
Thanks for continuing to provide interesting and relevant links on COVID, and of course the usual topics.
Regarding Bossches’s thesis…I ask, with no expertise in virology…
Is there any limit to how virulent this SARs virus could become under evolutionary pressure? If yes, perhaps there is still an acceptable risk-benefit trade-off from mass vaccination, particularly if there are long term effects of COVID a significant percentage of people who get infected?
Can the wide-spread use of anti-virals like Ivermection also put evolutionary pressure on the virus? Could this be the case even if the anti-virals are used in only severe cases, considering the large number of severe cases that would eventually occur in 8Billion people even if the severe case rate is only 1-2%?
Has the reduced infection rate in countries like the U.S. been more about the vaccination campaign, or natural immunity after infection, a waning of the viruses virulence? It appears – so far – that the vaccination campaign in the U.S. and some other countries has been successful. I am unclear of how Bossche would respond to that….I think he would say fine for the U.S., but without co-temporaneous vaccination of 8 billion people, new variants will spread and we will play whack-a-mole with vaccines and virus for years ahead?
But aren’t we always in some kind of evolutionary race with virus and bacteria (diminishing effectiveness of anti-biotics) unless we allow our species immune systems to address the viruses and bacteria, and change over time through death and survival?
Finally, more of a statement, but I continue to think no one has a “model” of how this virus will move through a highly mobile global population of 8Billion people. And from that model what are the best choices for minimum amount of harm. Maybe such a model is beyond our capacity to make in a short time period. Or at all, given it might present the kind of decisions that have to be made by battlefield generals, or farmers with their herds.
LikeLiked by 1 person
All good questions and I don’t know the answers.
Another question to ask about the reduced infection rate is are we experiencing a seasonal decline common with corona viruses that might reverse this fall?
I think Bossche answers questions on his site so you might try posting them there.
LikeLike
Thanks Rob. A further note…
I found this video last night… “Natural immunity key in US” – YouTube Dr. John Campbell. Some interesting take aways…even if numbers are only ballpark estimates…
On March 21st 2021 the Seroprevalence in donated blood in the U.S. was 49.1%, when only 13.7% of the Over 16 were vaccinated. So herd immunity was rising rapidly without the vaccine…
as of 21 March https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-trac… Deaths were 550,559. The estimated 162,000,000 Infection fatality rate by March 21, so the fatality rate is 0.4% (0.33985). From my memory, the fatality rate from the yearly seasonal flu (different every year) is about 0.15%.
BUT….this COVID 19 fatality rate was only kept this low because we shut down significant part so of the economy, so that the 2,255,380 hospitalizations were be spread out over a year or so rather than occur in some much shorter period of time. So COVID-19 ended up at 3X the seasonal flu, but only so because we shutdown travel, instituted wide-spread masking, social distancing, plexiglass installed everywhere, etc. etc.
Dr. John Campbell wonders/estimates that perhaps another a million of the 2,225,380 hospitalizations might have been deaths without economic shutdown, as the hospitals would not have been able to handle to load.
So, without the economic shutdown, the fatality rate of Sars-cov-2 would have been much higher than the seasonal flu. Maybe 9x?
Other questions: What would the death rate have been if we had instituted the use of Ivermectin etc. early in hospitalization, or even as a general prophylactic.
Lots of counterfactuals to deal, with, but still interesting to ponder.
A final note. The consensus is growing that Sars-cov-2 results in a vascular disease. COVID-19 is a vascular disease not a respiratory one, says study | Euronews. I don’t know my experience supports that idea, but when I was symptomatic with COVID19 last October, I experienced an increase in my blood pressure. (Also loss of smell). These sort of changes have never happened to me with the seasonal flu. COVID19 felt very real, and weird.
Hopefully my grey matter is still largely intact, but as it now seems COVID19 can affect the decrease brain tissue, please let me know if the quality of my comments to your site starts to diminish. 🙂
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/study-suggests-covid-19-harms-parts-of-the-brain-even-in-mild-cases/ar-AALhq2s?ocid=uxbndlbing
LikeLiked by 2 people
Interesting thanks. I detect no signs of COVID19 (or genetic reality denial) in your comment. 🙂
LikeLike
I missed this episode of Sam Harris’ podcast when it was streamed 2 months ago but listened to it today and it’s very interesting.
P.S. Neither Harris nor Reid are overshoot aware and both are on my list of polymaths in denial.
https://samharris.org/podcasts/special-episode-engineering-apocalypse/
LikeLike
China recently ordered a halt to bitcoin mining. This apparently reduced electricity consumption by about 8 GW which is the equivalent of about 4-8 coal fired plants.
Gail Tverberg says peak coal is in the rear view mirror for China.
Coincidence?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Does anyone remember between 2014 and 2016 when Guy McPhearson was telling people we’d all be dead in 10 years? He hasn’t got long left for that prediction LOL
LikeLike
Yes I remember LOL. I never believed his NTHE thesis. On the other hand, he got a lot right and our children and grandchildren are going to have one hell of a time with climate change (and de-growth forces like fossil energy depletion which McPherson ignored/denied).
Most thinkers in the overshoot space have some wheat and some chaff. McPherson had a lot of both.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Martenson today discusses Bossche’s thesis and concludes it is plausible but not proven and should be investigated with urgency due to the profoundly negative consequences for society if Bossche is correct.
Martenson also does an excellent job of explaining that Bossche’s credentials and experience place him at the top of the list of experts we should be listening to.
LikeLike
I’m watching the new BBC documentary series by Brian Cox titled Adventures in Space and Time.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m000wtdj
I have in my library all 6 documentary series that Cox has produced over the last 15 years. They’re usually very good. Cox is a smart and articulate physicist.
And yet…
How is it possible that not one in a thousand physicists has a clue about the human overshoot that has resulted from the very core of their discipline: thermodynamics?
It’s not possible without Varki’s MORT theory.
I’ve added Brian Cox to my list of brilliant polymaths in denial.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Just today I’ve read an interview with one of “famous” economist from “new ecological economy” school.
He mentioned energy once – “there is plenty of energy in the universe, just waiting to be used” :).
It is like throwing somebody into deep water and repeating: “just breath! there is plenty of oxygen in the water!” :).
They really don’t have a clue…
LikeLiked by 3 people
The discipline of economics is a disgrace on par with astrology. It should be banned from all universities.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Corona cases are increasing in Israel now. They say this is caused by the Delta variant.
LikeLike
Thanks, I see it on the Israel data site I monitor.
There’s a new Delta Plus variant with 22 cases in India today.
LikeLike
Wow. Joe Rogan interviewed Dr. Bret Weinstein and Dr. Pierre Kory today.
This should shift the awareness meter. Get your pitchforks ready.
LikeLike
LikeLike
Full Bossche interview is back up via a different video platform.
https://www.peakprosperity.com/the-vaccines-awesome-ingenuity-or-a-huge-mistake/
LikeLike
New rip of an important documentary is now available at the usual torrent sites.
It’s amazing that a wealthy, civilized, educated, democracy like Germany did what it did.
I’m thinking genetic reality denial must have played a role in the majority of citizens that stood by and watched.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3455822/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Review by Frank Kaminski of Alice Friedemann’s new book “Life After Fossil Fuels”.
https://mudcitypress.com/lifeafterfossilfuel.php
LikeLiked by 1 person
Tim Watkins elaborates on similar points today…
https://consciousnessofsheep.co.uk/2021/06/23/mere-statistics/
LikeLiked by 2 people
Tim Morgan today…
https://surplusenergyeconomics.wordpress.com/2021/06/23/203-surplus-energy-economics/
LikeLiked by 3 people
Tim Morgan in a reply to a comment to this article:
“As a general proposition, there’s a limit to how much self-sufficiency is achievable in complex societies. This is why I’m not a ‘survivalist’ or a ‘prepper’. We really are “all in this together”, and ‘best outcomes’ require that we persuade decision-makers to act wisely, on the basis of reality.”
This is one of the wisest, most intelligent bits of written thought I’ve ever read.
LikeLiked by 1 person
On the other hand, we can expect our governments to do the right things in response to the end of growth only after they’ve exhausted all of the wrong options and it’s no longer possible to deny reality.
So it might be wise to have some supplies on hand to get through a rough patch.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sorry Rob,
I think you’re denying the reality that our leaders will deny reality up until the bitter end (i.e. the collapse of civilization and all our deaths). They (our leaders and the 1% who have everything invested in BAU) will keep on doing what they are currently doing because that is what denial is – blindness. Maybe you are just a little too optimistic? (and I know I am too pessimistic!).
AJ
LikeLike
LOL, I’m thinking when they’ve exhausted every other option they’ll finally support conservation and population reduction, but you’re probably right that they’ll continue to deny reality by blaming the Russians or Chinese rather than acknowledging limits to growth.
LikeLike
You’re most likely right, but my fear is that they will deny reality until we are all dead.
On a side note – You recommended Nick Lane’s books.
I have just finished reading Life Ascending and I highly recommend it to anyone with an interest in Science. In this book, he goes over the 10 great inventions of evolution. Each of the chapters could be an argument for why we appear to be alone in the universe (all inventions could answer the Fermi paradox).
I thought all the chapters were excellent, but the on Consciousness was probably the best overall explanation of human consciousness that I have EVER read. I have reread the chapter twice and will continue to read it again and again. It is both profound and probably as close to correct as neuroscience (and he references most of the cutting edge research) can come at the moment to explaining why we (and animals) think and are aware. Sorry no soul, we are just chemistry in a meat package made by evolution.
I wonder if he is denial aware. It would be great to get him together with yourself or Dr. Varki to discuss MORT.
Thanks again.
AJ
LikeLike
I’m glad you enjoyed Life Ascending. It’s still my favorite book. I keep the audiobook on my phone and pull up random chapters every now again when walking. I’ve probably read the whole thing 8+ times. My favorite chapter is photosynthesis.
Everything we value on this planet hinged on evolution solving the extremely difficult problem of splitting a water molecule with a photon.
You should read his book “The Vital Question” next. It’s not quite as fun a read, but is actually a more important book in that he proposes a new theory for how complex life emerged.
P.S. Send me a message if you want help finding the book.
LikeLike
We can thank photosynthesis for:
– preventing the oceans from evaporating away like Mars
– increasing the efficiency of respiration so we can have an interesting multi-level food chain
– enabling the synthesis of lignin used for structure so large plants and animals can exist
– creating all of the food we enjoy
– creating fossil energy so we can be having this conversation
Lane also believes that if we could replicate photosynthesis in the lab we would solve our dependence on non-renewable fossil energy, and solve climate change, and solve our pollution problem. Apparently lots of people are working on it but evolution is still more clever than our best scientists.
I think artificial photosynthesis would definitely help but I suspect the relatively low energy density (5% of 1000 watts per square meter) would mean we’d still need a much smaller population that consumes less.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There’s a non-intuitive aspect to this story that some people miss.
The lifecycle of plant produces zero net oxygen because the excess oxygen that is produced during life is consumed by decomposition after death.
The only way to increase oxygen in the atmosphere is to have a geologically active planet that buries biomass thus preventing the consumption of oxygen for decomposition.
Which conveniently is also a requirement for the fossil energy needed to enable an advanced technology civilization.
And a geologically active planet is also a requirement for life which originates in hydrothermal vents by making a living from chemical energy until it can invent photosynthesis.
We really should be more aware and appreciative of our planet and our existence.
In this light I think population reduction policies are an obvious no-brainer.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Full time cloud researcher and part time overshoot predicament guru Tim Garrett might enjoy this. I sent it to him.
LikeLike
Garrett loved it.
LikeLike
Ilargi today…
https://www.theautomaticearth.com/2021/06/the-risks-to-the-fully-vaccinated/
LikeLike
Israel cases for last 30 days. Bossche predicted an increase “by summer” which began 3 days ago.
LikeLike
First hand examples of media censorship on Ivermectin.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/rvccR4Tg6fRS/
LikeLike
Good one from Norman Pagett…
LikeLiked by 2 people
They forgot the all important qualifier: “…because you evolved to deny unpleasant realities.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dr. John Campbell reviews a new meta-study paper that says Ivermectin probably reduces deaths by 62% and possibly reduces transmission by 86%.
Campbell says quality of paper and its conclusions demand a response from Fauci et. al..
LikeLiked by 2 people
Norman Pagett today…
Good thing we don’t need slaves when we’ve got solar panels. Now we just need to figure out how to make really really big batteries and solar panels without fossil energy. Or reduce our population.
https://ourfiniteworld.com/2021/06/18/how-energy-transition-models-go-wrong/comment-page-3/#comment-300948
LikeLiked by 1 person
We can’t get away from slaves even with solar panels. The Biden administration just banned imports of polysilicon solar-panel wafers from a Chinese company due to allegations of forced labor in Xinjiang. Turns out, that 45% of all solar-panel polysilicon is manufactured in Xinjiang – presumably from forced labor. This means that the cost of solar is going up. https://www.reuters.com/business/us-restricts-exports-5-chinese-firms-over-rights-violations-2021-06-23/
LikeLike
You can’t make this shit up. 🙂
LikeLike
https://beeinformed.org/2021/06/21/united-states-honey-bee-colony-losses-2020-2021-preliminary-results/
LikeLike
“and a 6.1 pp increase over the average loss rate (39.4%) over the last 10 years.”
Well, that feels like one of those moving baselines. I wonder what the winter colony loss rate was in say the 1950s?
Before the mass application of pesticides across America. “Glysophate/Roundup was introduced to the consumer market in 1974 as a broad-spectrum herbicide and quickly became one of the best-selling herbicides since 1980. In 1987, only 11 million pounds of the chemical were used on U.S. farms, but now nearly 300 million pounds of glyphosate are applied each year. Feb 2, 2016”
And before most of the 1C+ global average temperature warming occurred circa from 1975. 1C+ warming is 1.9C warming over the continents. With that, over the continents you get significant changes: higher high temperatures, higher low temperatures, with changes in dew points, migration of habitation zones for plants (upon which insects live), changes in weather patterns (due to reduced strength of polar vortex/jet streams, ocean circulation patterns, etc.), probably changes in ground level UV radiation for atmospheric ozone loss (due to warming and atmosphere changes), etc. etc. All to fast for animals and plants to adapt.
Ok, I suppose a few folks will say I am wearing my tin foil hat with this possible contributing factor. But note, our wireless communication world did not really get going in mass until the early 1980s. Wide spread global cellular coverage not till the 1990’s? Cellular Network coverage has become ubiquitous only in last 10-15 years….roll outs correlate somewhat with insect declines? Cell Tower/microwave range – radiation – from 20 and up to ~45 miles from tower/station. Coverage range varies by technology. A significant percentage of the world is now blanketed in coverage from cell towers, cell sites, cellular base stations, etc. Per Wikipedia, there are 2,134 communications satellites in Earth’s orbit.
There are a dozen other environmental stressors I could list that could be contributing to insect declines. Light pollution, extreme ecosystem fragmentation, road networks and vehicle traffic, pollution from multiple sources, ground level ozone from combustion engine activity, loss of natural biomass and the a reduction of the natural web of life, etc. etc.
The integrity of the habitable-for-life-zone of our spaceship earth has been compromised and possibly ruptured. Only a small? percentage of we humans could now survive in that life zone without the use of fossil fuels to prop up our supply of water and food.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I have some anecdotal evidence. I took a bee keeping course and the teacher talked about the good old days when very little skill was required to successfully produce honey. Today most amateurs fail.
Today I never have to clean the bugs off my car windshield. When I got my licence in 1976 cleaning the windshield was a regular necessity.
My reading on the topic suggests neonicotinoid pesticides are one of the biggest culprits.
But I agree with you that there are many forces.
The beach in front of my home is dead compared to that which I enjoyed as a child in the 60’s and 70’s.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The “toxic load” of current-use pesticides has increased considerably, so it is quite clear where some part of the stress/impact comes from. Here is the study, published in Science, that shows the data and the impacts: “Applied pesticide toxicity shifts toward plants and invertebrates, even in GM crops” Science 02 Apr 2021: Vol. 372, Issue 6537, pp. 81-84, DOI: 10.1126/science.abe1148, https://science.sciencemag.org/content/372/6537/81.
We know where the impacts come from, not just for this one, but for many others as well. This is not about a lack of knowledge – not at all. Willful ignorance and denial, again and again.
LikeLiked by 2 people
https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/308653
LikeLike
Nice explanation today from the Dark Horse podcast for why Covid data cannot be trusted and how it is deliberately being skewed to push agendas.
https://odysee.com/@BretWeinstein:f/EvoLens85:9
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s endlessly fascinating that almost all of our vanishingly few aware people discuss everything except the one and only policy that would improve every one of our overshoot related problems: rapid population reduction.
It’s got to be the genes talking.
https://consciousnessofsheep.co.uk/2021/06/28/climate-change-relegated/
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Rapid economic simplification” Huh? Come again? You aint saying I have to give up my Starbucks Triple, Venti, Half Sweet, Non-Fat, Caramel Macchiato? Hot showers? Sushi takeout? No way man. The American way of life is non-negotiable.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks to Steve for sending me this and suggesting an additional panel for the 20’s “stop at one child”.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fascinating and perhaps a glimpse into the future of rich counties.
There’s no need for 18 wheel tanker trucks or paved roads when you have a 125cc motorcycle.
LikeLike
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/heat-wave-dome-2021-seattle-portland-weather/
LikeLike
Doubly alarming that it’s still June.
LikeLike
Good comment by CTG @ OFW.
https://ourfiniteworld.com/2021/06/18/how-energy-transition-models-go-wrong/comment-page-7/#comment-301446
LikeLike
h/t Gail
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/a-leaked-un-report-warns-worst-is-yet-to-come-on-climate-change-heres-how-you-can-help
LikeLike
LikeLike
“A picture is worth a thousand words” LOL. Not anymore. Not that I don’t accept the above pic as real, but fact is, today you can’t always unconditionally trust what you see in a picture or video. Or hear in a recording. Not with Photoshop , video editing, deep fakes and others forms of techno sorcery.
LikeLike
Your part of the world is even making news down under. I hope your well.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-06-30/canada-us-heatwave-heads-into-uncharted-territory/100252678
LikeLike
Thanks, I’m surviving. The heat here is VERY unusual. Pretty much too hot to do anything.
LikeLike
Trillions are sloshing in and out with the daily tides.
I hope the baffles in the ballast tank hold.
This is not normal. Notice that the idiots in mainstream news ignore (aka deny) this.
https://wolfstreet.com/2021/06/30/feds-reverse-repos-spike-to-1-trillion-cash-drain-undoes-8-months-of-qe/
LikeLike
I have impression that things will happen quickly now…
Maybe not within weeks, but when people learn that “bright green future” is not there (and I guess it will be within 2-3 years maximum), the crumble spiral will be faster and faster…
LikeLike
It’s the big question. I have no idea, but I do say that interest rates will never rise significantly (above2% on the 10 year UST for more than six months) before collapse. The authorities will frantically pull demand forward as long as possible. It’s amazing to see. It’s the one prediction in which I have a lot of confidence.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Short thoughts on what collapse looks like financially?
Will it first be multiple countries on the periphery of this current global system falling financially or politically (food shortages, food prices as possible triggers), as the U.S. continues to “print” money to its advantage and the disadvantage of others? Or will the core of this current system, the U.S.A., suddenly reset downward to a much lower level of consumption and buying power? Can the Federal Reserve’s sustain it bond buying indefinitely? Maybe the test comes with the next geopolitical grey or black swan.
U.S. corporate earnings still look good, but maybe it is shortages of raw materials or much higher prices for those materials that start to eat into those profits and decrease consumer consumption levels, especially for discretionary items. A willingness to believe a materially prosperous future driven by technology still seems to be there, if frayed a bit by increasing social disorder/dis-union and increasing bad environmental news. Most people have their heads in the sand, or hands over there ears/eyes, to avoid thinking about the implications of those issues. There is no other alternative than continued belief in the existing system.
Behind all this discussion of possible outcomes of course is the invisible hand of energy supply and relentless depletion, and especially oil production. I think we are still down ~7mbpd global oil production from the November 2018 high, and if global GDP is tightly correlated, so real global GDP is down some commensurate amount. From memory the U.S. production today is something like 11mbpd down from 14mbpd. Maybe the globe and the U.S. could go back up to pre-COVID levels? But…
Background depletion on global oil fields in production is 3-6mbpd per year, so production activity is running on a faster and faster treadmill. Apparently, OPEC has quite a bit of surplus capacity still, but from two reports I saw that slack is gone in a year or two.
In any case, it seems like a bumpy ride from here on out in the best of economic cases. Supply chain issues from COVID will take several years to mend even if we had all the energy we needed. Then true oil shortages arrive. (Maybe they are there now, just masked by COVID. Environmental wastes including CO2 are now beginning to really impact food supply.
Seems like there is no “out” to a normal economy ever. Maybe there will be brief periods of respite, but the Federal Reserve will be forced to continue buy bonds until it cannot any longer.
LikeLike
Thanks. As long as there’s affordable oil and food the system seems to be quite resilient thanks to 8 billion clever monkeys all working hard to keep the system going. I’m amazed at how minor the inconveniences from Covid have been.
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLiked by 1 person
The Tyee is one of the better new outlets. Nevertheless they of course do not mention the need for population reduction (fewer new homes) nor consumption reduction (smaller homes) so that we cut fewer trees.
When I was a kid in the 70’s a 1000 sqft home was normal, now the normal exceeds 2000 sq ft. We are not happier or more comfortable today. We just consume more to keep up with our neighbors.
https://thetyee.ca/News/2021/06/24/Climate-Disaster-Hidden-BC-Forests/
LikeLiked by 2 people
New interview with Bossche.
LikeLike
I think Bossche might need to think about moving to Odysee. 😉
LikeLike
I have just read that YouTube has demonetised Brett Weinstein’s account. I find this deeply disturbing. I’m going to have to give some serious thought into how I interact with YouTube in the future.
LikeLike
He’s moved the Dark Horse podcast to Odysee. I’ve created an account and it seems to be a good alternative to YouTube.
https://odysee.com/@BretWeinstein:f?
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLiked by 2 people
The situation in Israel is developing more or less as outlined by van den Bossche: the number of cases is increasing and the vaccine is (much) less effective than it was thought. It seems that van den Bossche is not as wrong or clueless as insinuated by some/many.
LikeLike
Not really.
Look at deaths in last weeks – practically 0 for last 4 weeks.
Additionally 33 serious/critical cases in 2901 totak cases (1%) (what I can display now in worldometers.info).
So far this is exactly what mainstream promised – 80-90% of protection against getting sick and almost 100% against being sick morbidly.
I see nothing strange there – if we have millions of cases circulating around the world (as acive cases), you can expect that 10-20% of that get sick even after being vaccinated.
LikeLike
A short post on the epistemology of COVID. 😊
To function well psychologically, and socially, you must mentally simplify and accept the “truth” of many assumptions and socially accepted assertions about the nature of the world. For an individual, there is not enough time or energy to continually check or challenge these assumptions and assertions. You must accept the “truth” of things and move forward as best as one can, under the constraints imposed by place and circumstance. To continually question the truth of every foundational idea is to be frozen into paralysis by analysis or lost in an epistemological quick sand, or ostracized from ones social circles.
So we human beings, including even scientists, will repeat assertions about the world we assume to be true, but that we do not really KNOW are true. God exists, and rides a chariot across the sky every day.
Of course, over time, we do challenge our foundational ideas. Science provides a methodological framework for challenging assumptions and assertions about the nature of the world and finding “truths” that are more effective enabling us to leverage the natural world. Scientific “Knowledge” is hard won and can take years or decades to confirm.
Are the these new mRNA vaccines (for just the spike protein) safe in the short term? Long term? Truly a game changing technology? Should we attempt to mass vaccinate 8billion people? Or will mass vaccination will create evolutionary pressure for more transmissible or virulent variants or not? Should we vaccinate people who were previously infected? etc. etc.
I do not have the scientific knowledge to know the provisionally “correct” answers to all the questions about the SARs COV 2 virus and vaccinations and treatment. But I think I can see that that there are many assertions and assumptions being made about what is “true” regarding SARs COV 2, that are not backed by hard won scientific knowledge, tested over time.
These assertions are being made by scientists, public policy folks, and the mainstream media, in order to move forward under the current circumstances and social pressures. No one really KNOWs these answers. We are in the middle of a giant science (and social) experiment, gathering the data necessary to reach some tentative conclusions, in a few years from now at best. It could be a decade or more before we KNOW the “correct” answers.
And yet, there is certainly some science on which these consensus views and public policy are based. So today, what is provisionally true, and what is not, with regard to SARs Cov2? Should we mass vaccinate or not? On a personal level, should I get vaccinated even though I have had COVID? I don’t think so to both, but have to admit I am now wading in that epistemological quick sand on these issues. My friends and family have a much easier time of things, just accepting what they are told and taking action based on that. I know that the people in Peru, where the COVID death rate appears to be 9%, would take all the vaccines they could get right now.
LikeLike
Well said.
I agree with you that the issues are very complex, we don’t yet know the answers to most of the questions, and we are conducting a giant experiment.
On the other hand, if a goal is to prevent people getting sick, we know that vitamin D helps with very little cost and zero risk.
And if a goal is to prevent death or serious illness for those who do get infected, we know Ivermectin helps with very little cost and near zero risk.
Yet our leaders are not promoting Vitamin D or Ivermectin. So what are their goals? And why should we trust anything they say if they can’t get the basics right?
LikeLike
Where did you get the 9% Peru death rate? It looks like 0.6% to me.
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/peru/
LikeLike
My bad. I am churning through too much information these days. The article I saw was in the English? rag “The Sun” quoting 9% of all patients dying, not of infections (IFR). That Sun article is up on the web. It is correct that Peru is currently the leading the world right now in IFR.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-53150808
O.6% is 4 times worse than the annual flu of about .15. Do they have vitamin D and Ivermectin in Peru? I don’t know. Maybe they really need more vitamin D in general if darker skin native Peruvian ancestral groups now spend far less time outdoors than there ancestors. With my British Isles ancestry, I can get all the vitamin D I need in a day with 1o minutes of summer sunshine on my face. On the other hand, I burn in the tropical sun, or at altitude.
LikeLike
Correction to above comment.
IFR in my above comment should be CFR…Case Fatality Rate. CFR is the number of people who have died, divided by the total number of people DIAGNOSED with the disease.
See how Peru is in fact now at 9%. Mortality Analyses – Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center (jhu.edu) https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/mortality
The Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) is the number of deaths from a disease divided by the total number of cases/infections. Total number of cases in this calculation is usually estimated from antibodies in population blood samples, etc. This is the much lower figure of 0.6% above.
How to put all that in perspective? Don’t know. Peru has a total population of about 33Million. 193,909 have died to date.
And I should not be playing virologist on a web blog. ☹
LikeLiked by 1 person
In addition to needing replacements for YouTube and Facebook, we now need to find a replacement for Wikipedia.
No more donations to Wikipedia from me.
Trigger warning: this article will make you angry.
https://www.thedesertreview.com/opinion/columnists/wikipedia-and-a-pint-of-gin/article_22ffa0d8-dde9-11eb-be75-d7b0b1f2ff67.html
LikeLike
Sometimes the explanation for a troubling phenomenon is staring me in the face and yet I cannot see it:
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLiked by 3 people
Recall that the IPCC has an unblemished track record of being too optimistic.
LikeLike
https://www.abc.net.au/radio/newcastle/programs/drive/ivermectin-covid-19/13418066
About time. Why did it take so long to hear this from our national broadcaster? Arrrrg!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nice rant from Mac10 today. It seems he’s coming out the closet and is worried about much more than the stock market bubble.
https://zensecondlife.blogspot.com/2021/07/bullshit-is-driving-global-warming.html
LikeLike
Seems to me that for the longest time, Mac10 has been often right detecting symptoms of the economic illness, but wrong in the final diagnosis of the disease. His economic model was a traditional one, and assumed – using all his stock and money charts – that there would at some point be reversions to historical means (or below), and the normal business cycle reckonings of recession or depression.
I have made this same mistake in assuming we might go through one last period of standard business and equity market cycles. Time will tell, but if Limits to Growth BAU scenario is the roughly correct scenario, if Dr. Morgan’s SEEDS model is directionally correct, if environmental and climate models are roughly correct, we are at the end of economic growth as measured by energy and non-energy natural resource flows through the economy. We are also at a point where the waste products of any additional economic activity feedbacks against material growth. (Loss of food supply due to weather pattern changes, for example.)
Therefore, as Christopher O. Clugston states in his book “Blip,” there will never be another recession (or a depression) as conventionally understood. We are nearing the end of the economic system that began circa 1750, and organized circa 1945 into its current financial and geopolitical structure. Many of the standard assumptions about economics will NOT apply, as those assumptions were mostly devised during the period of economic growth powered by fossil fuels and in particular by oil. Correlations and analogues often used by prognosticators to predict stock market behavior are no longer relevant, if they ever really were. All those charts Mac10 puts up…
We can only speculate what the end of this system means for equity and bond markets. My guess, just a guess, is that the central governments and central banks continue to create additional liquidity as long as possible, until the current system crashes rather completely. Equity prices remain elevated, bond yields continue to reach historical lows. Until…the system crashes in some way. Material consumption, particularly in the U.S., then resets at a significantly lower level, maybe 20-30% lower. From this lower plateau, we reset financially, socially, and politically in a domestic sense, and geopolitically from a global sense.
What happens to stocks and bond in this crash? How do money, stocks and bonds function in a world of degrowth? Hard to say.
Of course, it’s a little small minded of me to worry about stocks and bonds, in a world that is burning and being diminished more every day by industrial consumption and waste. But I was born and raised during The Great Acceleration, and so I am a product of that system. My brain assumes so many things about how the world works, that are probably not true anymore. I suspect only those born on the other side of the great reset, and in the great deceleration, will be able to think differently.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thanks. It does feel like the next correction will be a big one due to the extreme debt we have used to delay the inevitable. I’d guess a 30-50% drop in our standard of living. If we had acted like adults and accepted reality we could have climbed down more slowly and had a better chance of retaining a civil society and avoiding war. The majority will of course say that no one saw it coming.
LikeLiked by 2 people
In the last year or two I started wondering if global resource wars are likely in the 2030s…
LikeLike
Albert Bates in the past has argued for peak dog. Today he makes the case for peak cat.
https://peaksurfer.blogspot.com/2021/07/the-great-pause-week-69-one-dark-secret.html
LikeLiked by 3 people
Sorry,
I was a little unimpressed with Albert Bates screed today. Sure pet ownership is utilizing resources wastefully and that contributes to global warming . . . but it is small potatoes compared to the global warming that is driven by transportation (planes, train and automobiles), a high fat, meat centered diet (that’s us 1st world!), and all the concrete and infrastructure for 8 billion (but probably most of it is for the top 10% economically). Once economic collapse occurs there will be far few “pets”. I went to China 35 years ago to my wife’s ancestral village. Never saw a cat, the only dogs were for eating, and NEVER saw an obese person. China probably has an advantage on us in that they can probably go back more easily to an agrarian lifestyle (if that’s even going to be possible??) than anybody in the U.S./Canada/Western Europe. We need fewer people (with fewer people there will be fewer pets too).
AJ
LikeLiked by 3 people
You’re right on all the points.
LikeLike
I would completely agree with this socially/culturally, but resource wise they are still in trouble. China has destroyed approx. one third of their arable land to mining (especially for rare earth mining for things like EVs and solar panels). They are one of the few countries willing to get these minerals. They have also lost a lot of top soil in the last few decades due to erosion, flooding, and the gobi dessert expansion. And the population is bigger than ever.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Albert Bates is a long-time resident of The Farm (that’s what it’s called…) in Summertown, Tennessee. The Farm was founded by Stephen Gaskin, who with his wife, Ina May Gaskin (founder of the modern midwifery movement), led a group of hippies from the San Francisco Bay area to Tennessee in the 1970s. Albert was in Mexico when Covid hit, and has been stuck there for the last year and a half. The Farm went through growing pains in the 1980s, but found new life in the sustainable-living Global Ecovillages movement. My wife briefly hung out with the Gaskin crowd before they left the S.F. Bay area. The Farm has a thing against pets – dogs and cats – regarding them as part of the unsustainable Western lifestyle. They have a point – but there are plenty of other things to be more worried about.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the back story.
LikeLike
The Farm has a web site, and a detailed Wikipedia entry: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Farm_(Tennessee). Albert is even mentioned as one of the key people.
LikeLike
LikeLike
We can avoid a climate disaster and thank god keep flying around the world in jets if we act boldly and innovate.
Get on it boys.
LikeLike
Clean jet fuel needs to be more like a microwave oven. And every child has a human right to own a pony.
https://www.gatesnotes.com/Energy/Introducing-a-new-way-to-invest-in-clean-energy-innovation
LikeLike
There goes Bill, barking up the unicorn tree again. I wonder what Melinda thinks of all this innovation stuff.
LikeLike
No hopium 😉 – just delusion and denial in service 0f social standing (as James (Megacancer’s back!!) said – humans evolved for 3 primary things, social standing, consumption and reproduction). Gates keeps going after the social standing thing. Wonder if it’s because of the divorce “problems”?
AJ
LikeLike
Weather everywhere is weird. Must be a coincidence.
https://climateandeconomy.com/2021/07/15/15th-july-2021-todays-round-up-of-climate-news/
LikeLike
Remember the good ol’ days when the Saudi’s used their huge surplus to buy our debt so we could live beyond our means and buy their oil?
https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Huge-Dividend-Cripples-Worlds-Largest-Oil-Company.html
LikeLike
Might want to read this.
https://grftr.news/why-was-a-major-study-on-ivermectin-for-covid-19-just-retracted/
and this:
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2021/jul/16/huge-study-supporting-ivermectin-as-covid-treatment-withdrawn-over-ethical-concerns
The truth is out there, but forces have so warped the reality field that we won’t recognize it when we see it.
LikeLike
Thanks, I read those when they were published and I wondered if all the evidence I have read in favor of Ivermectin could possibly be wrong?
Bret Weinstein interviewed Tess Lawrie yesterday and did a wonderful job of clearing away the deliberate fog.
Lawrie said, “I’ve never seen such a huge body of evidence being ignored.”
https://odysee.com/@BretWeinstein:f/TessLawrie:0
LikeLike