- 3.9K All Categories
- 24 Introductions
- 3K Typeface Design
- 589 Font Technology
- 922 Technique and Theory
- 440 Type Business
- 382 Type Design Critiques
- 469 Type Design Software
- 29 Punchcutting
- 98 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 59 Technique and Theory
- 39 Lettering Critiques
- 359 Typography
- 241 History of Typography
- 91 Education
- 27 Resources
- 411 Announcements
- 63 Events
- 90 Job Postings
- 126 Type Releases
- 131 Miscellaneous News
- 238 About TypeDrawers
- 49 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 101 Suggestions and Bug Reports

Linus Romer
Posts: **137**

In the first section of this draft, I describe a formula to make two G¹–continuous cubic Bézier curves G³–continuous. Though the formula actually works for two G¹–continuous cubic Bézier segments only, it seems to work for more segments as well, if being iterated.

The formula (and its iteration) is implemented in the Curvatura script for FontForge. Feel free to try it.

Is this algorithm already known?

(As far as I can see, the RMX tools have an algorithm to make curves G³–continuous as well (called supersmooth), but my algorithm is probably different: "supersmooth" seems to move the node perpendicular to its handles, my algorithm scales the handles.)

0

## Comments

137498I always thought harmonized is harmonized (of course, how harmony is achieved may differ), but now it turns out there are all sorts of harmonized.

137But I do not want to preach that you should use G3 continuity. Just as "harmonize" it could be a useful tool. On the other hand, kinks and sharp changes of curvature can also be beautiful.1,375163137additionallyapply "Make G3 continuous": (the gif shows original to harmonized and made g3)498I have a feeling that moving the nodes rather than the handles preserves more of the intended shape.

550137`a3`

because it's the on-curve point. Fine. Instead, compute where`a3`

should go according to this algorithm, work out the delta between the new position and the current position, and apply that delta to the handles`a2`

and`b1`

instead.498Some more silly questions: do you think it would be difficult/possible to

1. Port this functionality to Glyphs app?

2. Give users a choice: adjust handles, adjust nodes, or say 50/50?

1371. Yes, it should not be too problematic to write a Glyphs plugin with the same functionality. The math is open, the implementation under GPL. As I don't have Glyphs, someone else would have to do this.

2. You already have the choice: "Harmonize" will move the node, "Make G3 continuous" will move the handles. Mathematically speaking, going from G1 to G2 means 1 additional constraint (like moving the node), going from G1 to G3 means 2 additional constraints (like moving the two handles). Therefore, in generic cases the best you can get by moving the node ist G2. 50/50 does not make sense in a mathematical point of view, but one can easily implement a mixture of "Harmonize" and "Make G3 continuous".

498163This was created with 2 vector points like this...

Then, using "Nodes at Extremes" to create my final example above. Like this...

Tools and advanced algorithms are a help but no substitute for skill and developing a good eye. But, everyone is entitled to their opinion and methods. Your "G3-continuous" algorithm is an improvement. I commend you on your efforts. Someday, sorry to say, machines and automated programs will indeed replace the artist and the craftsman.

1,375137478thank you very much for publishing openly available math alongside your Curvatura code. At FontLab, we’ve made a successful test implementation of your “Make G3 continuous” method in FontLab 7. The app already has included Harmonize, Balance aka Tunnify, and adding inflections, so G3 was a useful addition.

Since our Harmonize (G2) implementation only moves the node and keeps the handles in place (which allows us to have the dynamic G2 node aka Genius node), I realized that we can add specificity to Harmonize by calling it “Harmonize Nodes”, and then add the second operation (your Make G3 continuous), which we called “Harmonize Handles”, since it actually keeps the node position and only moves the handles.

- As previously, you can Harmonize a Smooth node with Alt+2xclick to make it G2, or convert it to Genius (dynamic G2) with Shift+Alt+2xclick

- You can now Harmonize Handles with Ctrl+Alt+2xclicking a Smooth or Genius node to make it G3

The new Harmonize Handles operation is available in the beta version of FontLab 7.1.0 that we just released. You can download the beta at https://download.fontlab.com/ — it’s available as a 30-day trial or with your FontLab 7 license, for macOS, Windows (32- and 64-bit). The 32-bit Windows version is said to work well under Linux with Wine.

I’ve described Harmonize Handles in the FontLab 7.1.0 beta release notes:

https://help.fontlab.com/fontlab/7/manual/Release-Notes-Beta/#harmonize-handles

I have found that Harmonize Node is a very neat way to get “some sort of reasonable defaults” for the handle configuration of a smooth node. Not universal and good for everything, but decent as quick defaults. This actually plays nicely with the Alt+2xclicking a Sharp node operation, which in FontLab 7 “normalizes a corner” i.e. makes reasonable defaults for a sharp node.

I can’t wait what others will think of it! Many thanks

Adam

1,654478G0 continuity (Sharp nodes):

G1 continuity (Smooth nodes):

G2 continuity (Smooth nodes with Harmonize Nodes applied, or Genius nodes):

G3 continuity (Smooth nodes with Harmonize Handles applied):

This gives you the idea.

In my view, Harmonize Handles is useful, but as Linus said, you need to be more aware of its limitations, so in FontLab 7, we’re only exposing it in the UI in a limited fashion (for example, there is no way to apply this to all glyphs, as it would not be advisable to do this thing "blind").

478I agree, G3 "removes" any "visual structure" along a longer Bezier spline. In a single-master design, you may just as well remove that kind of node.

Harmonize Handles (G3) may be useful if you decide to keep a node which you want to be super-smooth (“silent” or “super-harmonic”) in one master, but then you need it to be "functional" (“have an individual voice”) in another master for whatever reason.

137Curvatura, I have ditched the «Make G³-Continuous» algorithm in favour of a «Harmonize Handles» algorithm which ensures G²-continuity only but is more flexible (i.e. it has solutions for nearly any reasonable case).However,

ifG³-continuity can be gained without exceeding the tangent triangle, it may still be the superior solution.911379191550I suppose you could trace the bitmaps to curves, then harmonize them, then re-rasterize them. But my suspicion is that in general the autotraced curves would be very yucky and harmonizing wouldn't work on them.

912,118I haven’t looked at this aspect of TT quadratics to know, but it is at least

possiblethat TrueType is (usually? always?) G³-continuous already, in those cases when the on-curve point is merely implied. Probably not, though, as it would involve a bit more processing from the rasterizer to figure out the implied point position. The design of TrueType is all about saving processor power, even when at the cost of needing more data.91168Thanks!

168